Most mass shootings could have been prevented if we had an ASSAULT WEAPONS ban in place.

You showed a photograph. Apparently in your book, if the gun looks menacing, it’s an assault rifle. Got it.
Wait… you think it was me with the picture?

Poor BabyBoobs. Not hard to go back and see who had the picture and who didn’t.

Do they do BINGO after dinner there?
 
Sorry, it was someone else who posted the photo. M16 rifles used in the US military are select fire and use 223/5.56 X 45 ammo so they qualify as assault weapons. You’ll be happy to learn that these cannot be purchased by non-military or non-law enforcement civilians.
 
Sorry, it was someone else who posted the photo. M16 rifles used in the US military are select fire and use 223/5.56 X 45 ammo so they qualify as assault weapons. You’ll be happy to learn that these cannot be purchased by non-military or non-law enforcement civilians.
Awww, forgot how the reply button works…

But look, you do know how to apologize for things when you make mistakes. There is hope yet!

And what happens with those who were in get them and because we are crap with mental illness they shoot up a school house?
 
Awww, forgot how the reply button works…

But look, you do know how to apologize for things when you make mistakes. There is hope yet!

And what happens with those who were in get them and because we are crap with mental illness they shoot up a school house?
I’m just glad you don’t want to ban AR15 style rifles. SCOTUS has pretty much taken that option off the table anyway.
 
I’m just glad you don’t want to ban AR15 style rifles. SCOTUS has pretty much taken that option off the table anyway.
B-15! Does that give you the win? Congrats!

AR-15s are so great for hunting rabbits! Makes them all nice and tender.
 
Most mass shootings could have been prevented if we had an ASSAULT WEAPONS ban in place!

SANDY HOOK, UVALDE, would NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!
Incorrect. The weapons used in those shootings were already illegal. Furthermore, we did an assault weapons ban. It had essentially no effect, and Congress repealed it within a year.

We have over 20,000 gun laws in this country. 20,001 won't make any difference.

In the 1960s, you could get a gun by mail order from the Sears catalogue. There were more guns per capita then than now. We didn't have mass shootings. Disarming the people won't deter the criminals, who, by definition, don't follow the law.

Well over 90% of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones like schools and shopping malls. The left's solution is to turn the whole country into a gun-free zone, Second Amendment or no Second Amendment.

Also, in cases like Parkland, the cops were ordered to wait outside by teh Democrat sheriff while the murderer went on his rampage.

We need to harden those targets. Single point of entry, security.

Let teachers carry if they want to.

We need to have better mental-health treatment so the loony birds who do these things aren't running around.

Knowing that they are running around, we need to stop the inflammatory rhetoric. It only feeds these people.

And we need to have harsher penalties for these crimes.

I'm sure there are other steps we can take. But the lefties' solution is ALWAYS to trample on our rights.
 
Thank you! Now, what isn't protected under the second amendment?
Actually anything. If we actually followed the 2nd Amendment we'd have no problems with Uncle Joe having mustard gas. I don't have the text in front of me right now. Does it mention an age somewhere? Considering there are twenty million rapists, murderers, and drug dealers in the country (before you count blacks and whites) I think little Suzy should be packing when she goes to the playground. You never know when Epstien might show up in his plane.
 
Hel_Books said:
Thank you! Now, what isn't protected under the second amendment?

Actually anything. If we actually followed the 2nd Amendment we'd have no problems with Uncle Joe having mustard gas. I don't have the text in front of me right now. Does it mention an age somewhere? Considering there are twenty million rapists, murderers, and drug dealers in the country (before you count blacks and whites) I think little Suzy should be packing when she goes to the playground. You never know when Epstien might show up in his plane.
If you look at all of the forms of speech that aren't allowed (slander, libel, incitement, screaming "fire" in a crowded theatre, false advertising, invasion of privacy, child pornography, blackmail and extortion, harassment, excessive noise levels, etc.) combined with time, place and manner restrictions on speech that are permitted by your 1st Amendment, how can anyone insist that the 2nd Amendment is somehow "absolute" and immune to regulation?

Perhaps they should just read the Constitution literally and say that nobody but the National Guard (a "well-regulated militia") should have any firearms at all?
 
If you look at all of the forms of speech that aren't allowed (slander, libel, incitement, screaming "fire" in a crowded theatre, false advertising, invasion of privacy, child pornography, blackmail and extortion, harassment, excessive noise levels, etc.) combined with time, place and manner restrictions on speech that are permitted by your 1st Amendment, how can anyone insist that the 2nd Amendment is somehow "absolute" and immune to regulation?

Perhaps they should just read the Constitution literally and say that nobody but the National Guard (a "well-regulated militia") should have any firearms at all?

I don't think they really meant the National Guard so much as a local militia. It wouldn't be your job it was just something you showed up for on a regular schedule to show you were physically fit, could use your weapon yadd yadda. But yeah.
 
Back
Top