Most mass shootings could have been prevented if we had an ASSAULT WEAPONS ban in place.

The “ban assault weapons” crowd still trying to figure out exactly what they want to ban. Lol.
 
Most mass shootings could have been prevented if we had an ASSAULT WEAPONS ban in place!

SANDY HOOK, UVALDE, would NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!
BS. BTW, numb nuts, the biggest school massacre in US history was carried out with Dynamite. Aside from the unevolved Third World, there is no shortage of mentally depraved people capable of extreme violence thanks to the thousands being churned out by man-hating Democrat aligned women in the nation's teaching profession.
 
Gun violence happens way too often in the USA. I do support being able to own a gun. I don’t agree with calling some guns “assault” weapons. A person can assault another with words, a knife, a bat…. Just ban all automatic weapons and pass registration laws.
Try buying an automatic weapon in whatever state you live in. Unless you’re specialized military or law enforcement with federal authorization, you’re out of luck.
 
BS. BTW, numb nuts, the biggest school massacre in US history was carried out with Dynamite. Aside from the unevolved Third World, there is no shortage of mentally depraved people capable of extreme violence thanks to the thousands being churned out by man-hating Democrat aligned women in the nation's teaching profession.
On more than one occasion I've tried to have a discussion on how to deal with that issue...................crickets.
 
Hel_Books said:
I just adore it when you mention your second amendment! Suppose I publish a story that says you're a child molester, and as a result of it you lose your job. But it turns out to be false. But you get death threats and rocks thrown through your windows.

Then you say you'll sue me for libel.

Then I say, "First Amendment. Fuck off."

Then you say "But the First Amendment isn't absolute, it doesn't allow you to . . . "

A-HA!

Libel is not protected under the first amendment. IMHO
Thank you! Now, what isn't protected under the second amendment?
 
Thanks for confirming that you have no idea. Someone told you “assault weapons” should be banned, but you have no idea what that means.
Ohhhh, someone. Been around guns all my life, never needed assault weapons.

But we get why you like them.
 
What is a regular unit? Please do tell? 🤦‍♂️
A unit of militia that is well regulated will do. Funny thing, as a professor of constitutional law said to me once, ink was expensive in those days and they didn't throw in random phrases like that to pad out the page. Every word was considered like it is now (unless Trump is signing off on a great pork bill obviously). They didn't have an army as such but they did have units of militia that were controlled by regulations. That was the language of the time.
 
A unit of militia that is well regulated will do. Funny thing, as a professor of constitutional law said to me once, ink was expensive in those days and they didn't throw in random phrases like that to pad out the page. Every word was considered like it is now (unless Trump is signing off on a great pork bill obviously). They didn't have an army as such but they did have units of militia that were controlled by regulations. That was the language of the time.
You can create a militia at a drop of a dime and don’t need yellow hairs or anyones approval to do so though. Orders and regulations just come from a chain of command. Training can be given to anyone off the streets and form them into a unit. So anyone who be a member of a militia, so it could apply to all citizens. 🤷‍♂️. If a foreign invader came many “militias “ would spring up suddenly without government regulation but would still have regulation.
So would insurgents not also be well regulated by the definition?🤔 Ones insurgent is another’s freedom fighter.
At the end of the day, every citizen should have the ability to possess a firearm if they chose even the ones the uneducated deem “scary”.
 
You can create a militia at a drop of a dime and don’t need yellow hairs or anyones approval to do so though. Orders and regulations just come from a chain of command. Training can be given to anyone off the streets and form them into a unit. So anyone who be a member of a militia, so it could apply to all citizens. 🤷‍♂️. If a foreign invader came many “militias “ would spring up suddenly without government regulation but would still have regulation.
So would insurgents not also be well regulated by the definition?🤔
They wouldn't be 'well-regulated militia' as envisaged. They would be 'Meal Team 6'.
If they intended for any such idiot to be armed they would have said so.
 
They wouldn't be 'well-regulated militia' as envisaged. They would be 'Meal

They wouldn't be 'well-regulated militia' as envisaged. They would be 'Meal Team 6'.
If they intended for any such idiot to be armed they would have said so.
Because you deem so? they would be considered a well regulated militia regardless. So if I organized a group, trained them then wouldn’t I have a militia?
 
What is your definition of an assault weapon?
What’s your favorite jello?

You like with the fruit chunks in it? Or does that ruin it?

And if you need to try to be GI JOE, sign up. If not, how many bullets do you need to be able to expend in 30 seconds?
 
Most mass shootings could have been prevented if we had an ASSAULT WEAPONS ban in place!

SANDY HOOK, UVALDE, would NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!

The worst mass shootings take place in countries that ban guns.

Russia. Germany. China. North Korea. etc.
 
What’s your favorite jello?

You like with the fruit chunks in it? Or does that ruin it?

And if you need to try to be GI JOE, sign up. If not, how many bullets do you need to be able to expend in 30 seconds?
You want to ban a category of weapon that you cannot define.
 
Back
Top