The great uniter.....

There's no Faux as either a news or other media outlet. Except in your mind.
The difference between Fox News ("Faux" news in some quarters) and respected news outlets is simply this:

Other mainstream news outlets have integrity, an obligation for thorough investigation and a desire to tell the unfiltered truth.
Fox does not. They aer under no obligation to fact-check or even tell the truth, even after their claims are proven false. They are there to tell the viewers what they want to hear, regardless of truth. And they have been sued, and called out on this, multiple times.

Therefore no; Fox News cannot be trusted as a reliable news source.

Hope this helps.

Think of it like this. Say I witnessed your brother steal beer from your refrigerator. You think highly of your brother and don't want to believe he is a thief. So I say it was your neighbor, and claim it was a fact that your neighbor stole the beer. Then your wife sees your brother sneakily drinking your beer. And yet, I still cling to the story that it was the neighbor.

THIS is the kind of thing Fox News does to their viewers. No obligation to report facts, rather, they twist or outright invent facts to please their viewers. Again, I hope this explanation is helpful.
 
Fox openly describe themselves as Entertainment…maybe its time the word News was replaced in their name?
 
The difference between Fox News ("Faux" news in some quarters) and respected news outlets is simply this:

Other mainstream news outlets have integrity, an obligation for thorough investigation and a desire to tell the unfiltered truth.
Fox does not. They aer under no obligation to fact-check or even tell the truth, even after their claims are proven false. They are there to tell the viewers what they want to hear, regardless of truth. And they have been sued, and called out on this, multiple times.

Therefore no; Fox News cannot be trusted as a reliable news source.

Hope this helps.

Think of it like this. Say I witnessed your brother steal beer from your refrigerator. You think highly of your brother and don't want to believe he is a thief. So I say it was your neighbor, and claim it was a fact that your neighbor stole the beer. Then your wife sees your brother sneakily drinking your beer. And yet, I still cling to the story that it was the neighbor.

THIS is the kind of thing Fox News does to their viewers. No obligation to report facts, rather, they twist or outright invent facts to please their viewers. Again, I hope this explanation is helpful.


I'm sure that you think all of that's true.

Unfortunately for you, reality is quite different.
 
That clip wasn't "Fox News", not even a MAGA disciple. That's a Canadian pod caster doing what she wants. I can link up maybe 7 or 8 more Canadians following the same train of thought. They aren't Trump followers, they're concerned for their nation.

What I find interesting is the lack of curiosity on the part of the "progressive" trolls. The jumping to conclusions, invariably wrong.

Keep it up you closed minded shit for brains.
 
That clip wasn't "Fox News", not even a MAGA disciple. That's a Canadian pod caster doing what she wants. I can link up maybe 7 or 8 more Canadians following the same train of thought. They aren't Trump followers, they're concerned for their nation.

What I find interesting is the lack of curiosity on the part of the "progressive" trolls. The jumping to conclusions, invariably wrong.

Keep it up you closed minded shit for brains.
They weren't discussing your clip
 
That clip wasn't "Fox News", not even a MAGA disciple. That's a Canadian pod caster doing what she wants. I can link up maybe 7 or 8 more Canadians following the same train of thought. They aren't Trump followers, they're concerned for their nation.

What I find interesting is the lack of curiosity on the part of the "progressive" trolls. The jumping to conclusions, invariably wrong.

Keep it up you closed minded shit for brains.

The video you posted has no relevance to your original statement.

Are you still pretending that another oil pipeline from Canada to the US would be bad for Canada? Your MAGA sheep logic is impossible to follow. 😄
 
The video you posted has no relevance to your original statement.

Are you still pretending that another oil pipeline from Canada to the US would be bad for Canada? Your MAGA sheep logic is impossible to follow. 😄
Of course not. Watching the Canadian go to shit has no relation to the OP. :rolleyes:
 
*chuckle* You don't have a clue as to what's happening up there or its implications.
 
*chuckle* You don't have a clue as to what's happening up there or its implications.

*chuckle* You don’t have a clue as to what you meant in your original post, because it was nonsense.

Another oil pipeline from Canada to the US is not in any way detrimental to Canada.

It’s amusing that you have so much animosity toward Canada simply because Donnie told you to. You’re such an obedient sheep. 😆
 
*chuckle* You don’t have a clue as to what you meant in your original post, because it was nonsense.

Another oil pipeline from Canada to the US is not in any way detrimental to Canada.

It’s amusing that you have so much animosity toward Canada simply because Donnie told you to. You’re such an obedient sheep. 😆
The story, IF true, has nothing to do with the pipeline per se'. It has to do with Alberta entering into what in effect is a treaty with a foreign power without Ottawa having any part of the negotiations. THAT is what the story is about and its significance.
 
The story, IF true, has nothing to do with the pipeline per se'. It has to do with Alberta entering into what in effect is a treaty with a foreign power without Ottawa having any part of the negotiations. THAT is what the story is about and its significance.

No no no, don't you understand? It's not about Alberta, Ottawa, Canada, oil pipelines, or anything else. It's about nothing but TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMP!!!

It truly is amazing how deranged some people are.
 
No no no, don't you understand? It's not about Alberta, Ottawa, Canada, oil pipelines, or anything else. It's about nothing but TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMP!!!

It truly is amazing how deranged some people are.



Take your meds, You!!!


🤣 :nana:
 
The story, IF true, has nothing to do with the pipeline per se'. It has to do with Alberta entering into what in effect is a treaty with a foreign power without Ottawa having any part of the negotiations. THAT is what the story is about and its significance.

Where do you come up with this stuff? :)

Canadian Provinces sell resources from fish to potash to trees to oil and hydro electricity internationally every day… there’s no requirement to ask Ottawa’s “permission.”

What a silly thing for you to suggest…. Too much Jordan Peterson!
 
Make me, Alt!!!


Better yet, report me.


🤣 :nana:

Better be careful, Alt. Otherwise you might find yourself deported and your Litizenship revoked like all the lefties are praying for (despite most of them being self professed agnostics).

That might make Pax happiest of all knowing that I have one less Alt on the board.
 
Better be careful, Alt. Otherwise you might find yourself deported and your Litizenship revoked like all the lefties are praying for (despite most of them being self professed agnostics).

That might make Pax happiest of all knowing that I have one less Alt on the board.



They still haven't reconciled that tiny bit of does-not-compute-ism, nor with my being Allah's Favorite.


It's another one of those Conflicting Concepts Comfortably Compartmentalized.


Where is an Injun when you need one anyway???
 
Back
Top