Cock Talk

[BongoGal]

Because I, and many women out there, can have multiple orgasms…I think I prefer the idea of a reverse harem. Just having one man after another until I'm fully satisfied, the others can watch in wait of their turn, but all at once seems a little overwhelming.

My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ‘contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?

 

[johnsmith190812]

My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ‘contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?

That sounds so hot

 

[AmberLGreen]

That sounds so hot

You are probably going to need a conference call

 

[johnsmith190812]

You are probably going to need a conference call

Do I now

 

[AmberLGreen]

Yes, as you twirled your tassels

Awww you are so sweet. Mo would have just said as I swung my pancake titties but you calling them tassels makes it sound so much more beautiful

 

[jason28053]

Do I now

And some water to quench your thirst! Lol

 

[Mrtenant]

Circle jerks, daisy chains, soggy biscuits, bukake . . .


We aren’t even hearing stories about a friend’s neighbor’s cousin.

My conclusion: these things exist in porn only and maybe some people have tried them post internet porn, but they don’t really exist in every day life.

This makes things dull.

I prefer to live in a world where Bigfoot, Nessie and the Jersey Devil are circle jerking on a UFO with the aliens and bukake(ing) the Lady in White (ghost) while she eats biscuits.

It just makes life more fun.

I'll remember that the next time you're craving a Dirty Sanchez.

 

[MindYaBitness]

My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ‘contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?

You have to screen out guys who ha e performance anxiety. And, is there a penalty for finishing under the timer?

 

[johnsmith190812]

You have to screen out guys who ha e performance anxiety. And, is there a penalty for finishing under the timer?

Should be

 

[hotwords229_A]

My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ‘contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?

And this is how you win my vote for Director of all future Olympics.

 

[MindYaBitness]

I'll remember that the next time you're craving a Dirty Sanchez.

Is that something that's known to be "craved"?

 

[Mrtenant]

Is that something that's known to be "craved"?

*smiles... ohhhh heyyyy..... why do you ask?

 

[peekingone]

You have to screen out guys who ha e performance anxiety. And, is there a penalty for finishing under the timer?

Some may get stage fright too

 

[Lmizzler]

I’ve always known a circle jerk to be when dudes are jerking the guy off next to them in a circle. I’ve described many a meeting I’ve sat through using those exact words.
“That meeting was nothing more than a big circle jerk!”

 

[jason28053]

I’ve always known a circle jerk to be when dudes are jerking the guy off next to them in a circle. I’ve described many a meeting I’ve sat through using those exact words.
“That meeting was nothing more than a big circle jerk!”

A circle of jerks. Aka, a presidential cabinet meeting!

 

[MindYaBitness]

This is not intended to be a political posts, but with all this talk of bukake & circle jerks, I had to share for anyone who hasn't seen this yet


I'm telling you, every Ad Agency needs a 12 year old boy on staff, or a Litster on pay roll, to show them the obvious design flaws!

 

[jason28053]

This is not intended to be a political posts, but with all this talk of bukake & circle jerks, I had to share for anyone who hasn't seen this yet
View attachment 2550732

I'm telling you, every Ad Agency needs a 12 year old boy on staff, or a Litster on pay roll, to show them the obvious design flaws!

Double jerking lol

 

[Taegul]

Double jerking lol

When the job interviewer asks you about your multitasking capabilities...

Oh, I take a real hands-on approach.

 

[QuietCanadian]

This is not intended to be a political posts, but with all this talk of bukake & circle jerks, I had to share for anyone who hasn't seen this yet
View attachment 2550732

I'm telling you, every Ad Agency needs a 12 year old boy on staff, or a Litster on pay roll, to show them the obvious design flaws!

I might suggest that there is someone who has the humour of a 12 year old and/or Litster on payroll who is laughing themselves silly when stuff like this gets through.

 

[Taegul]

I’m hesitant to look up “the elephant walk”.

Yeah, I don't know what to think of that but now I'm rethinking WTF was Neneh Cherry really singing about...

 

[aussiegeekygal]

What the hell did I stumble upon

My cavernous vagina

 

[jason28053]

My cavernous vagina

Coyote Canyon

 

[hotwords229_A]

I’ve always known a circle jerk to be when dudes are jerking the guy off next to them in a circle. I’ve described many a meeting I’ve sat through using those exact words.
“That meeting was nothing more than a big circle jerk!”

But then, wouldn’t that meeting have been a good thing?

 

[MindYaBitness]

But then, wouldn’t that meeting have been a good thing?

Depends on how desirable the participants are!

 

[hotwords229_A]

Depends on how desirable the participants are!

As long as everyone got off, who are we to judge?