Cock Talk

I mean, if I were to do it, I don’t think I’d necessarily advertise my services.

It would have to be private, like everything else I do. Discretion, trust, consent - if it doesn’t feel right, it’s not going to go right.

That’s the thing, feeling that with so many people at once… it starts to lose its appeal. I can’t possibly connect to eight people at the same time, even if all I care about is how badly they want to get off. Without that spark, it would feel grody, I think.

But if it was unplanned, like I said, well, there would be different sort of sparks and motivations to maybe… preform.

Maybe I should ask some of my friends of friends.
Look, you can stop being coy. This is a judgment free (mostly, looks around suspiciously) space.
 
Okay, I looked up the ā€œelephant walkā€. At first, it just gave me examples of elephants walking, so I changed the search to ā€œelephant walk penisā€. That was a huge mistake.

Finally, ā€œelephant walk euphemismā€ and learned what it meant. Not as bad as I had imagined.
But it would have been better if one of you could have just told me what it was! 🤣
 
Okay, I looked up the ā€œelephant walkā€. At first, it just gave me examples of elephants walking, so I changed the search to ā€œelephant walk penisā€. That was a huge mistake.

Finally, ā€œelephant walk euphemismā€ and learned what it meant. Not as bad as I had imagined.
But it would have been better if one of you could have just told me what it was! 🤣
It’s a song written by Henry Mancini lol
 
Okay, I looked up the elephant walk. At first, it just gave me examples of elephants walking, so I changed the search to ā€œelephant walk penisā€. That was a huge mistake.

Finally, ā€œelephant walk euphemismā€ and learned what it meant. Not as bad as I had imagined.
But it would have been better if one of you could have just told me what it was! 🤣
I was gonna! I learned about it from a college friend who went to a prep school and transferred to Duke after freshman year. Probably because we refused to participate. Rich people are fucking weirdos.
 
Because I, and many women out there, can have multiple orgasms…I think I prefer the idea of a reverse harem. Just having one man after another until I'm fully satisfied, the others can watch in wait of their turn, but all at once seems a little overwhelming.
My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ā€˜contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?
 
My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ā€˜contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?
That sounds so hot
 
Circle jerks, daisy chains, soggy biscuits, bukake . . .


We aren’t even hearing stories about a friend’s neighbor’s cousin.

My conclusion: these things exist in porn only and maybe some people have tried them post internet porn, but they don’t really exist in every day life.

This makes things dull.

I prefer to live in a world where Bigfoot, Nessie and the Jersey Devil are circle jerking on a UFO with the aliens and bukake(ing) the Lady in White (ghost) while she eats biscuits.

It just makes life more fun.
I'll remember that the next time you're craving a Dirty Sanchez.
 
My version of the reverse harem idea involves one guy at a time and nobody watching. Each ā€˜contestant’ gets sixty seconds to get me off, but when the timer buzzes, he has to go immediately stop and get back into his soundproof booth. Let’s give them fifteen seconds to stop and get hidden again (if he takes too long, then he’s disqualified). If there are, say, five guys in competition, one of them will be declared the winner if he’s the one who is there when my orgasm happens. Guy#3 might get me right to the edge when his timer goes off, but Guy#4 might win soon after his next sixty window opens. Guy#1 will never win on his opening try, but I think his chances become the best when it becomes his turn again. The difficulty, I think, would be in those fifteen+ second gaps between turns because upward momentum is paused. Maybe a two-guy version would be better than with five?
You have to screen out guys who ha e performance anxiety. And, is there a penalty for finishing under the timer?
 
Back
Top