More Winning For The American People

You have no coherent argument, so you say they're ugly?
"As a political statement (and the book [Arrival and Departure, by Arthur Koestler] is not much more), this is insufficient. Of course it is true in many cases, and it may be true in all cases, that revolutionary activity is the result of personal maladjustment. Those who struggle against society are, on the whole, those who have reason to dislike it, and normal healthy people are no more attracted by violence and illegality than they are by war. The young Nazi in Arrival and Departure makes the penetrating remark that one can see what is wrong with the left-wing movement by the ugliness of its women. But after all, this does not invalidate the Socialist case. Actions have results, irrespective of their motives. Marx’s ultimate motives may well have been envy and spite, but this does not prove that his conclusions were false. In making the hero of Arrival and Departure take his final decision from a mere instinct not to shirk action and danger, Koestler is making him suffer a sudden loss of intelligence. With such a history as he has behind him, he would be able to see that certain things have to be done, whether our reasons for doing them are ‘good’ or ‘bad’. History has to move in a certain direction, even if it has to be pushed that way by neurotics. In Arrival and Departure Peter’s idols are overthrown one after the other. The Russian Revolution has degenerated, Britain, symbolized by the aged consul with gouty fingers, is no better, the international class-conscious proletariat is a myth. But the conclusion (since, after all, Koestler and his hero ‘support’ the war) ought to be that getting rid of Hitler is still a worth-while objective, a necessary bit of scavenging in which motives are almost irrelevant."

-- George Orwell, "Arthur Koestler," 1946
 
Last edited:
Republicans have always been about the stock market and our national defense prowess.

What happened and why is the reason MAGA?
 

It's seriously amazing that trump can be in 2 places at the same time. At his golf club and at the White House for the Easter weekend.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...he-trump-white-house-easter-egg-roll-n2655901

As for your bullshit about him being "the laziest President in history:"

https://nypost.com/2025/02/15/us-news/biden-took-off-577-days-in-4-years-tops-modern-era-presidents/
 
It's seriously amazing that trump can be in 2 places at the same time. At his golf club and at the White House for the Easter weekend.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...he-trump-white-house-easter-egg-roll-n2655901

As for your bullshit about him being "the laziest President in history:"

https://nypost.com/2025/02/15/us-news/biden-took-off-577-days-in-4-years-tops-modern-era-presidents/
Your comprehension is getting worse, Derpy. Senility must be a real bitch.

It's not my fault you voted for a lazy fat fuck.
 
Republicans have always been about the stock market and our national defense prowess.

What happened and why is the reason MAGA?
The 1% cares about those things. MAGA is a much more demotic movement -- not many stockholders.
 
From your link....577 days "according to shocking new data compiled by the Republican National Committee.".

Interestingly, information about other presidents' vacation days come with links to verified sources. Not so with President Biden....guess we're supposed to take the highly partisan Republican National Committee at their word?

Seriously, using the RNC as source data is as weak intellectually as your spinal column is physically.
 
From your link....577 days "according to shocking new data compiled by the Republican National Committee.".

Interestingly, information about other presidents' vacation days come with links to verified sources. Not so with President Biden....guess we're supposed to take the highly partisan Republican National Committee at their word?

Seriously, using the RNC as source data is as weak intellectually as your spinal column is physically.
Derpy is becoming very Reichguide-esque.
 
Judge strikes down 'unprecedented' Trump order targeting Perkins Coie law firm

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who called the executive order an attack on the American judicial system, said Trump’s directive “violates the Constitution and is thus null and void.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie in a blistering opinion calling the president’s efforts “an unprecedented attack” on the U.S. judicial system.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, issued a permanent injunction barring the enforcement of any part of Trump’s order from March, which focused on the firm’s representation of 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and its work with billionaire donor George Soros.
 
Judge strikes down 'unprecedented' Trump order targeting Perkins Coie law firm

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who called the executive order an attack on the American judicial system, said Trump’s directive “violates the Constitution and is thus null and void.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie in a blistering opinion calling the president’s efforts “an unprecedented attack” on the U.S. judicial system.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, issued a permanent injunction barring the enforcement of any part of Trump’s order from March, which focused on the firm’s representation of 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and its work with billionaire donor George Soros.


Another activist judges micro managing the Executive.
 
Back
Top