hotwords229_A
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
- Posts
- 21,439
This is me.They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is me.They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
I have very very rarely received an unsolicited dick pic. But then I don't often post pics of myself. And definitely nothing showing full nudity.Although Iām not eager to send my Schlong to every woman on Lit, I do still understand the stimulation factor of doing it.
I donāt know, itās weird. Maybe someday we will figure it out, until then it does seem necessary to mention not wanting dick pics in your inbox.
On the other hand, there are a few women on Lit that complain that they donāt get unsolicited dick pics and they want them. I wonder if the solution is asking for them in order to not get any?![]()
Well said!I have very very rarely received an unsolicited dick pic. But then I don't often post pics of myself. And definitely nothing showing full nudity.
But I agree about the stimulation factor of sending a pic. That's why it gets saved for only the special people. For me, anyway.
Someone once suggested to me the way that different people think can have a factor in the sending of unasked for pics. It belies a confidence, an entitlement of your attention, that is not founded in any reality. I mean, once you see this perfect dick, how could you possibly not want to be theirs for eternity?
Knobjectification
https://64.media.tumblr.com/4dae91e627cf3baed768584195ad093c/2ca48474bd69903d-df/s1280x1920/6911650e293d49ca4bea2ce7e1d9b76755418ef4.pnj
It has come to my attention that women donāt objectify men enough.
Why do you think women donāt seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think āDamn!ā or āGross, a dick!ā?
Do you like seeing a man cum?
Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?
So, yes?No. Unless itās me. Or in porn.
HioSo, yes?![]()
This is well expressed. It gives me a clear picture of why the visual variety is so valued. Beauty, and beauty in the variation. I totally get it, which is something that's eluded me before.There are many different parts of the female body which are obviously beautiful, but if I had to pick only one part to see for the rest of my life, with the vulva. There is a reason Georgia O'Keefe made so many paintings based on the female genitals - it's a work of art.
So for me personally, it is absolutely about the variety and beauty.
This is brilliant.Someone once suggested to me the way that different people think can have a factor in the sending of unasked for pics. It belies a confidence, an entitlement of your attention, that is not founded in any reality. I mean, once you see this perfect dick, how could you possibly not want to be theirs for eternity?
Lovely.I believe it mirrors the way some men long to experience things they never quite will, like being desired for more than just what they can offer. Maybe even like child rearing, in a twisted kind of empathy.
They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
And for some, that flips into a kind of panic. The idea that anyone isn't thinking the way they do feels impossible, so they behave in⦠bizarre ways.
Maybe they just want to feel wanted and their dicks got there first![]()
I think there would be much more of a tease, less blatant dick, and more titillation. Back when the Dick-Pic Judging Thread was going, I noticed that the most common question about a pic was "does this make me want to see more of him?". A good pic is like meeting a new guy at a bar, in that it's likely his laugh, or a joke he tells, that makes you want to see more of him.Coming back to this, letās say Playgirl was completely run by womenāpublishers, writers, photographers, etc. What would be different about it?
Just focusing on the picture spreads, what would you expect would be different?
I don't believe I represent the majority of men, not that I'm some altruistic guy or anything, but it's beauty and the physical part of the female form I desire most. And just as all the lovely women have stated regarding the connection, if I have a relationship with the woman attached, it is a significantly more meaningful to see.This is well expressed. It gives me a clear picture of why the visual variety is so valued. Beauty, and beauty in the variation. I totally get it, which is something that's eluded me before.
Yup, I totally get it. Women are ostensibly objectified at every turn and often their value is adjusted based on their physical attributes. It's wrong, and it's bullshit.It's interesting how my position view creates a different perception. Much of my experience as a woman has been that of objectification. So, for me, the desire for volume -> collectables -> objectification.
I appreciate your response!Unless it's under very specific circumstances, I'm not interested in more objectification.
Viewpoint can translate action into near opposing outlooks.![]()
This resonated with me a bit. It's twisted, but my worth has always been based on what I can do and provide for others. I want to be physically desired. I want to be objectified because I want to feel desired. I know it's not necessarily a healthy mindset, but I want to be more than a workhorse and ATM.I believe it mirrors the way some men long to experience things they never quite will, like being desired for more than just what they can offer. Maybe even like child rearing, in a twisted kind of empathy.
They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
And for some, that flips into a kind of panic. The idea that anyone isn't thinking the way they do feels impossible, so they behave in⦠bizarre ways.
Maybe they just want to feel wanted and their dicks got there first![]()
I do think I do my fair share, but Iāll admit, some of the other ladies are slackingIt has come to my attention that women donāt objectify men enough.
I think a lot of women are very visual but not usually primarily visual. So some other element has to be triggered, aroused, intrigued, before the visual element kicks in.Why do you think women donāt seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
Donāt think Iāve ever seen a copy. I also never saw playboy, either.Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
So many. Men and women. All over my walls. A giant shrine to music, angst, and sexual appeal.Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
It doesnāt stimulate me sexually in and of itself. If thereās more to the imageāwords or another personāitās the fantasy created by the image. If itās just the man, I have to have some sort of more fleshed out (hehe) relationship with them. Even if thatās just friendship or more exposure to them. Seeing a one off image of a stranger isnāt going to do anything for me. I can admire it, definitely. But it isnāt going to stimulate me.Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
Can be. Not a major fantasy of mine but thereās certain situations where I find it sexy.Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
If itās someone Iām not involved with, I usually think⦠why is it not being spun in a circle for my enjoyment??When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think āDamn!ā or āGross, a dick!ā?
If I had a hand (hehe) in the execution or inspiration.Do you like seeing a man cum?
Iāve never been to any type of strip club, of any gender.Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
I prefer the man/woman combo I think, because it provokes more of a fantasy than a random man.Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?
So, yes?![]()
.... Thank you, museThis sounds like the perfect beginning to an erotic story.![]()
Your enjoyment of the helicockter is entertaining to me.If itās someone Iām not involved with, I usually think⦠why is it not being spun in a circle for my enjoyment??
Wouldnāt that be Naked Men Behind People in Horse Costumes?Correct.
I just noticed the pic in your original post. I feel like that is aimed at me.
https://64.media.tumblr.com/4dae91e627cf3baed768584195ad093c/2ca48474bd69903d-df/s1280x1920/6911650e293d49ca4bea2ce7e1d9b76755418ef4.pnj
It is not the easiest thing to do thoughYour enjoyment of the helicockter is entertaining to me.![]()
No, it isnāt.It is not the easiest thing to do though![]()
I see you also have some experience at attempting this trickNo, it isnāt.
You need to be at just the right level of arousal without going over!![]()
maybe we should splice together a vid of everyone's "outtakes"No, it isnāt.
You need to be at just the right level of arousal without going over!![]()
I think, in this instance, it would be the male in question *cough* Pmann *cough*Wouldnāt that be Naked Men Behind People in Horse Costumes?![]()
I certainly thought so. *nods*I just noticed the pic in your original post. I feel like that is aimed at me.
I think, in this instance, it would be the male in question *cough* Pmann *cough*
IN the horse costume.
I mean, maybe that's incorrect, but that's the way the thread read to me.
I certainly thought so. *nods*
Something I've always been curious about -
Pretty sure I wasn't around at that thread's inception, but I scrolled through it at some point. There's a picture of (presumably) you, in horse head, sitting in a high-backed chair reading a book. There is a small dog in your lap.
What was the dog's attitude towards your . . . costume?
Confused? Did it think it was a game? What are the crazy humans up to? Or was it all laissez-faire because you are always sitting about in horsey attire.![]()
*pocket full of kibble.The dog (Duchess) was happy to be there. It wasnāt my dog, but a friendās dog. I hadnāt been around the dog too much, so it wasnāt used to me. But my loving aura* made it easy for animals to be in my presence.
While I don't subscribe to/watch the Rampant Poles of Pleasure, Man Meat Monday, or Show Me The Soft Cock threads, I do subscribe to the Sexy Men of Literotica thread and @morelikeasong's helicockters thread. I'm at least trying to do my part.Knobjectification
It has come to my attention that women donāt objectify men enough.
I think that many women are just as aroused by images as men are, but are more specific about the images they choose.Why do you think women donāt seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
No subscription, but did see some of the photos.Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
Michael Hutchence from INXS, Duran Duran, Adam Ant... lots of open shirtsDid you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
I enjoy looking at naked men, when it is my choice to look at them. I greatly appreciate the male body overall. Iām a very visual person, so seeing a naked man who is attractive to me is often arousing. But it can depend on the situation, my mood, my experiences with the person, etc. I can acknowledge that a naked man is empirically sexy without it necessarily arousing me.Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
It certainly can be.Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
While cocks can be very sexy and arousing to look at, a big aspect of that is how they are presented in the image. No matter how beautiful the cock, I will never be aroused by a super close up shot of just the cock of a person I donāt know. I donāt want to be that close to your cock unless I know you. A cock that is photographed by a man while he sits on the toilet will always be gross, regardless of how the cock itself looks.When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think āDamn!ā or āGross, a dick!ā?
There are several circumstances in which I like/love seeing a man cum. The most arousing is when I have a connection with the person and have been involved in the process of bringing him to orgasm. Next would be having a connection with the person and having inspired the orgasm. What do I love about it? Watching how he touches himself, how his body moves and his breathing changes. Hearing his gasps and moans. I love it.Do you like seeing a man cum?
The opportunity has never presented itself. I wouldn't be opposed to it, but it's not something I'm seeking out.Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
I'm a big fan of images of naked men who are comfortable and confident in their nudity. I prefer more of a complete picture, as opposed to specific body parts. The idea of a romance novel cover style pose is not so appealing. If he's with a woman, I'd rather have a shot from her POV.Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?