hotwords229_A
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
- Posts
- 21,098
You ladies have really dropped the balls on this one.I didn't realise there was a target we had to hit![]()

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You ladies have really dropped the balls on this one.I didn't realise there was a target we had to hit![]()
A win for you, maybeOh, I wasn’t referring to unsolicited pics being stimulating, I just meant the idea of someone seeing me in that state was stimulating.
There is nothing exciting about sending an unsolicited pic. At least, not to me.
However, with the invention of the dick pic, Flashers have all but gone extinct. So that’s kind of a win?![]()
That’s a good point.However, you're too scared to do it publicly...so your solution is to send it to my, or some other unsuspecting woman's, inbox?
Surely there's a study somewhere that explains this phenomenon. I'm afraid to google it.That’s a good point.
It does seem like a public pic would garner a better result.
So now we’re back to the “why” of it all.![]()
Coming back to this, let’s say Playgirl was completely run by women—publishers, writers, photographers, etc. What would be different about it?I'm 99% sure this was made by men hence the whole male gaze.
Edited to add, it was created and published by men. It did have a female editor-in-chief, at least in the 80’s. It would be fascinating to look into the subscribers and readership stats along with the ad revenue and article topics. Who the photographers were would be interesting too.
It was a man's world in 1973, when playgirl debuted, women couldn't even get a loan without a male co-signer so the ability to create a magazine for women by men was limited at best.
I don’t think women are less visual than men. I think women check out different features on men that are less obvious when we’re checking them out or flirting for the first time in an everyday scenario.Why do you think women don’t seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
I didn’t but found my parents and older brother’s stash. I definitely got away with adding SkinAMax to my parents cable subscription for a few months before the figured it out and removed it. Then the internet came and it was game on with nudes and a/s/lDid you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
Sure did!! Ripped those out of magazines or from the back walls at Spencer’s!Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
It’s both for me! The image of the naked man draws my attention first. I’ll find myself grazing my eyes along their body noting the features I like most. Then, sometimes imagining myself there with him in the fantasy the image creates. If there’s a connection to the man? Game on. Fire ablaze!Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
I don’t mind it but I’m not stimulated by it.Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
Depends. If I’m looking at porn, images, etc., and it’s a good looking dick, the scenario it’s in is hot, etc., hell yeah it’s damn!When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think “Damn!” or “Gross, a dick!”?
Omg!! Yes, fuck yes! To see the throb, the spurt, the ejaculation. The volume, consistency, where, and how he came is hot as can be! It’s also the culmination of the work put into the act. Again, if there’s a connection to the man, I’m done for! HahaDo you like seeing a man cum?
Yes I have! It’s all fun. Men are visually appealing to me. From Soft Bods, Dad Bods, Toned or Ripped Bods. There are different things that are appealing to each body type.Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
I sure do! It’s a side hobby of mine to peruse both male and female boudoir and erotic boudoir. I appreciate both the male and female form in all of its glory!Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?
Surely there's a study somewhere that explains this phenomenon. I'm afraid to google it.
It baffles me. I have never sent an unsolicited dick pic to any woman. Dick pics are everywhere. I have no idea why these guys think theirs is so special.Please expand on this! What makes a guy want to share his lap taffy with unsuspecting viewers? I'm so curious to know what goes through a guy's mind as he wars with the logic of knowing an unsolicited pic likely won't be received well, and the complusion to send it any way.
googled for you. This is an article from men's healthSurely there's a study somewhere that explains this phenomenon. I'm afraid to google it.
This is me.They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
I have very very rarely received an unsolicited dick pic. But then I don't often post pics of myself. And definitely nothing showing full nudity.Although I’m not eager to send my Schlong to every woman on Lit, I do still understand the stimulation factor of doing it.
I don’t know, it’s weird. Maybe someday we will figure it out, until then it does seem necessary to mention not wanting dick pics in your inbox.
On the other hand, there are a few women on Lit that complain that they don’t get unsolicited dick pics and they want them. I wonder if the solution is asking for them in order to not get any?![]()
Well said!I have very very rarely received an unsolicited dick pic. But then I don't often post pics of myself. And definitely nothing showing full nudity.
But I agree about the stimulation factor of sending a pic. That's why it gets saved for only the special people. For me, anyway.
Someone once suggested to me the way that different people think can have a factor in the sending of unasked for pics. It belies a confidence, an entitlement of your attention, that is not founded in any reality. I mean, once you see this perfect dick, how could you possibly not want to be theirs for eternity?
Knobjectification
https://64.media.tumblr.com/4dae91e627cf3baed768584195ad093c/2ca48474bd69903d-df/s1280x1920/6911650e293d49ca4bea2ce7e1d9b76755418ef4.pnj
It has come to my attention that women don’t objectify men enough.
Why do you think women don’t seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think “Damn!” or “Gross, a dick!”?
Do you like seeing a man cum?
Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?
So, yes?No. Unless it’s me. Or in porn.
HioSo, yes?![]()
This is well expressed. It gives me a clear picture of why the visual variety is so valued. Beauty, and beauty in the variation. I totally get it, which is something that's eluded me before.There are many different parts of the female body which are obviously beautiful, but if I had to pick only one part to see for the rest of my life, with the vulva. There is a reason Georgia O'Keefe made so many paintings based on the female genitals - it's a work of art.
So for me personally, it is absolutely about the variety and beauty.
This is brilliant.Someone once suggested to me the way that different people think can have a factor in the sending of unasked for pics. It belies a confidence, an entitlement of your attention, that is not founded in any reality. I mean, once you see this perfect dick, how could you possibly not want to be theirs for eternity?
Lovely.I believe it mirrors the way some men long to experience things they never quite will, like being desired for more than just what they can offer. Maybe even like child rearing, in a twisted kind of empathy.
They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
And for some, that flips into a kind of panic. The idea that anyone isn't thinking the way they do feels impossible, so they behave in… bizarre ways.
Maybe they just want to feel wanted and their dicks got there first![]()
I think there would be much more of a tease, less blatant dick, and more titillation. Back when the Dick-Pic Judging Thread was going, I noticed that the most common question about a pic was "does this make me want to see more of him?". A good pic is like meeting a new guy at a bar, in that it's likely his laugh, or a joke he tells, that makes you want to see more of him.Coming back to this, let’s say Playgirl was completely run by women—publishers, writers, photographers, etc. What would be different about it?
Just focusing on the picture spreads, what would you expect would be different?
I don't believe I represent the majority of men, not that I'm some altruistic guy or anything, but it's beauty and the physical part of the female form I desire most. And just as all the lovely women have stated regarding the connection, if I have a relationship with the woman attached, it is a significantly more meaningful to see.This is well expressed. It gives me a clear picture of why the visual variety is so valued. Beauty, and beauty in the variation. I totally get it, which is something that's eluded me before.
Yup, I totally get it. Women are ostensibly objectified at every turn and often their value is adjusted based on their physical attributes. It's wrong, and it's bullshit.It's interesting how my position view creates a different perception. Much of my experience as a woman has been that of objectification. So, for me, the desire for volume -> collectables -> objectification.
I appreciate your response!Unless it's under very specific circumstances, I'm not interested in more objectification.
Viewpoint can translate action into near opposing outlooks.![]()
This resonated with me a bit. It's twisted, but my worth has always been based on what I can do and provide for others. I want to be physically desired. I want to be objectified because I want to feel desired. I know it's not necessarily a healthy mindset, but I want to be more than a workhorse and ATM.I believe it mirrors the way some men long to experience things they never quite will, like being desired for more than just what they can offer. Maybe even like child rearing, in a twisted kind of empathy.
They know how lust pulls them apart, so it makes sense that eventually, they crave the same gaze in return - to be wanted and reduced to flesh the way they've seen women be.
And for some, that flips into a kind of panic. The idea that anyone isn't thinking the way they do feels impossible, so they behave in… bizarre ways.
Maybe they just want to feel wanted and their dicks got there first![]()
I do think I do my fair share, but I’ll admit, some of the other ladies are slackingIt has come to my attention that women don’t objectify men enough.
I think a lot of women are very visual but not usually primarily visual. So some other element has to be triggered, aroused, intrigued, before the visual element kicks in.Why do you think women don’t seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?
Don’t think I’ve ever seen a copy. I also never saw playboy, either.Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?
So many. Men and women. All over my walls. A giant shrine to music, angst, and sexual appeal.Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?
It doesn’t stimulate me sexually in and of itself. If there’s more to the image—words or another person—it’s the fantasy created by the image. If it’s just the man, I have to have some sort of more fleshed out (hehe) relationship with them. Even if that’s just friendship or more exposure to them. Seeing a one off image of a stranger isn’t going to do anything for me. I can admire it, definitely. But it isn’t going to stimulate me.Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?
Can be. Not a major fantasy of mine but there’s certain situations where I find it sexy.Is guy-on-guy hot or not?
If it’s someone I’m not involved with, I usually think… why is it not being spun in a circle for my enjoyment??When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think “Damn!” or “Gross, a dick!”?
If I had a hand (hehe) in the execution or inspiration.Do you like seeing a man cum?
I’ve never been to any type of strip club, of any gender.Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?
I prefer the man/woman combo I think, because it provokes more of a fantasy than a random man.Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?
So, yes?![]()
.... Thank you, museThis sounds like the perfect beginning to an erotic story.![]()
Your enjoyment of the helicockter is entertaining to me.If it’s someone I’m not involved with, I usually think… why is it not being spun in a circle for my enjoyment??
Wouldn’t that be Naked Men Behind People in Horse Costumes?Correct.
I just noticed the pic in your original post. I feel like that is aimed at me.
https://64.media.tumblr.com/4dae91e627cf3baed768584195ad093c/2ca48474bd69903d-df/s1280x1920/6911650e293d49ca4bea2ce7e1d9b76755418ef4.pnj