Nightwaves
Experienced
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Posts
- 72
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
I getcha, our work can appeal to one's prurient interests. I use the word "prurient" as a call out the Supreme Court's 1964 ruling attempting to define what is obscene (or, pornographic) vs what is merely indecent vs profane. (Here's a link to a FCC page about it: Obscene, indecent, and profane broadcasts)
The three-pronged test established by the Supreme Court:
- It must appeal to an average person's prurient interest;
- depict or describe sexual conduct in a "patently offensive" way; and,
- taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
I sincerely hope that my writing accomplishes the first one, veers away from the second one, and provides my reader with the complete opposite of the third one.
If so, then I'm glad I provided my reader with a temporary respite from everyday life.
I getcha, our work can appeal to one's prurient interests. I use the word "prurient" as a call out the Supreme Court's 1964 ruling attempting to define what is obscene (or, pornographic) vs what is merely indecent vs profane. (Here's a link to a FCC page about it: Obscene, indecent, and profane broadcasts)
The three-pronged test established by the Supreme Court:
- It must appeal to an average person's prurient interest;
- depict or describe sexual conduct in a "patently offensive" way; and,
- taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
I sincerely hope that my writing accomplishes the first one, veers away from the second one, and provides my reader with the complete opposite of the third one.
If so, then I'm glad I provided my reader with a temporary respite from everyday life.
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
I wonder what the US Supreme Court would do with this if it revisited this standard in a new case. This has been the law for over 40 years, but every single one of those three elements is absurdly vague and subjective. You can get anything now on the Internet, porn-wise. The only thing that remains illegal is stuff like child porn and bestiality, because it doesn't involve consenting adults. I'm not sure the Miller standard means anything anymore.
It's one of the main selling points, surely, of writing erotica - knowing that you're giving folk happy times in their hard and wet places? Especially when they comment to thank you .Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
When Justice Potter Stewart was asked what pornography was, he replied, "I know it when I see it."
Doubt I'm alone in this, but do you wonder about how many orgasms you've induced with your works? Pervy, yes, but there's a reason (aside from personal gratification) why we write this stuff.
He actually said that about obscenity, not pornography, but, regardless, it was not one of the finest or most clarifying moments for the US Supreme Court.
It's one of the main selling points, surely, of writing erotica - knowing that you're giving folk happy times in their hard and wet places? Especially when they comment to thank you .
I managed both wet and hard from the same story:One comment saying that I had given someone "happy times in their hard and wet places" would be better than twenty 5-votes.
Aside: does it counting you've given that to yourself?
Loved "The Artists Studio". The build up was very erotic. I was wet the whole time I was reading this story. Thank you!
Oh My! Original, fabulous and VERY effective. My response was considerable!