richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
This is medically referred to as "Bookshelf Butt."
You are medically referred to as a "racist idiot".
What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?
- Thread starter Ulaven_Demorte
- Start date
- Status
You are medically referred to as a "racist idiot".
U
unregistered
Guest
mercury14
Pragmatic Metaphysician
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Posts
- 22,158
This message is hidden because richard_daily is on your ignore list.
You're such a fucking coward.
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
*views posts*
According to your brother pereg, you are. Talking about someone you know has you on iggy.
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
He bragged about it, and still has your name in his signature... That's some hilarious shit right there.
He might as well just call you "daddy".
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
Did pedobear just come to his lover's aid?
Let me know.
Let me know.
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
U
unregistered
Guest
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
We know this is true because Lady F told us she walked in on him jacking his cock to Ken on the phone.
The question is, how much did he have to pay this time?
He does have a warehouse full of corn his mom left him.
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 72,706
We know this is true because Lady F told us she walked in on him jacking his cock to Ken on the phone.
The question is, how much did he have to pay this time?
So you admit that Karen Kraft was a man named Ken, then.
WHOM YOU PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT WAS A WOMAN.
RIGHT? YOU WOULDN'T KEEP BACKING LADY FUNK'S WORDS UP AS TRUTH IF YOU DIDN'T BELIEVE IT.
U
unregistered
Guest
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 72,706
Ahhh.
You're being a technical pussy again.
"It's what Lady Funk said, not what I said. Lady Funk's words are her words, not mine. I'm just saying what Lady Funk said, I didn't say that. So if you have a problem with what I'm repeating as a truth that I'm conveniently enabling, when she's directly referring to Karen Kraft being a man named Ken and nobody else, then take it up with Lady Funk, not me."
Carry on!
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
You still are denying Karen is man? Srsy? You believe LadyF because you want to believe her. Fuck, your buddy CIH thinks LadyF is LT, ffs.
RobDownSouth
Never Banhammered
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 72,468
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,185
We know this is true because Lady F told us she walked in on him jacking his cock to Ken on the phone.
She never said any such thing.
U
unregistered
Guest
U
unregistered
Guest
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 72,706
U
unregistered
Guest
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Senate Democrats Protect Corporate Jet Loophole
Jonathan Karl (@jonkarl) Feb 21, 2013, 4:03 PM
Listening to the White House, you'd think the key to averting the across-the-board spending cuts (the dreaded "sequester") set to in place on March 1 is closing the tax break for owners of private jets.
Here was White House Press Secretary Jay Carney last week:
"How do you explain to a senior that we're doing this, asking you to sacrifice, but we're not saying that corporate jet owners should lose their special tax incentive."
On Wednesday, Carney summed up the Republican position this way: "We'd rather see our national security undermined than corporate jet owners, God forbid, give up their tax break."
And President Obama in an interview Wednesday with KAKE-TV in Wichita: "What we don't want to do is give somebody who's buying a corporate jet an extra tax break."
Carney has brought up the corporate jet tax break at every single briefing this week.
Listening to the White House, you might think that the "balanced" Democratic plan to avert the spending cuts would close that loophole for private jets.
But you would be wrong.
The Senate Democratic plan - which has been endorsed by the White House and is, in fact, the only Democratic plan actively under consideration right now - doesn't touch corporate jets.
We asked Carney if the White House is upset that the Senate Democrats' plan protects corporate jets. His answer:
"Our position - in the president's plan that has been available for ages but republicans and some reporters pretend doesn't exist - is that the corporate jet loophole should be eliminated. We'd be fine if it were eliminated as part of the revenue component of a sequester buy-down or as part of broader tax reform in a bigger balanced deficit reduction deal. Either way. And either way, Republicans oppose it, and would rather see sequester hit than ask corporate jet owners to give up their special tax break. How is that not true?"
Even if the Senate plan did end the tax break for private jets, it wouldn't make much of a difference. The tax break - which allows the owners of private jets to depreciate their airplanes over five years instead of the standard seven years for commercial airplanes - would raise less than $300 million a year. That's a tiny fraction of the $85 billion in across-the-board cuts scheduled to go into effect this year.
But - even so - the Senate Democratic plan allows that tax break to continue - unchanged.
The White House also frequently mentions tax breaks for oil and gas companies. The Democratic plan does eliminate some of those, but even that doesn't add up to much: Just $2 billion in the Senate Democratic plan.
Jonathan Karl (@jonkarl) Feb 21, 2013, 4:03 PM
Listening to the White House, you'd think the key to averting the across-the-board spending cuts (the dreaded "sequester") set to in place on March 1 is closing the tax break for owners of private jets.
Here was White House Press Secretary Jay Carney last week:
"How do you explain to a senior that we're doing this, asking you to sacrifice, but we're not saying that corporate jet owners should lose their special tax incentive."
On Wednesday, Carney summed up the Republican position this way: "We'd rather see our national security undermined than corporate jet owners, God forbid, give up their tax break."
And President Obama in an interview Wednesday with KAKE-TV in Wichita: "What we don't want to do is give somebody who's buying a corporate jet an extra tax break."
Carney has brought up the corporate jet tax break at every single briefing this week.
Listening to the White House, you might think that the "balanced" Democratic plan to avert the spending cuts would close that loophole for private jets.
But you would be wrong.
The Senate Democratic plan - which has been endorsed by the White House and is, in fact, the only Democratic plan actively under consideration right now - doesn't touch corporate jets.
We asked Carney if the White House is upset that the Senate Democrats' plan protects corporate jets. His answer:
"Our position - in the president's plan that has been available for ages but republicans and some reporters pretend doesn't exist - is that the corporate jet loophole should be eliminated. We'd be fine if it were eliminated as part of the revenue component of a sequester buy-down or as part of broader tax reform in a bigger balanced deficit reduction deal. Either way. And either way, Republicans oppose it, and would rather see sequester hit than ask corporate jet owners to give up their special tax break. How is that not true?"
Even if the Senate plan did end the tax break for private jets, it wouldn't make much of a difference. The tax break - which allows the owners of private jets to depreciate their airplanes over five years instead of the standard seven years for commercial airplanes - would raise less than $300 million a year. That's a tiny fraction of the $85 billion in across-the-board cuts scheduled to go into effect this year.
But - even so - the Senate Democratic plan allows that tax break to continue - unchanged.
The White House also frequently mentions tax breaks for oil and gas companies. The Democratic plan does eliminate some of those, but even that doesn't add up to much: Just $2 billion in the Senate Democratic plan.
jeninflorida
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2003
- Posts
- 22,463
what we need is more welfare, right Izzy?
Ahhh.
You're being a technical pussy again.
"It's what Lady Funk said, not what I said. Lady Funk's words are her words, not mine. I'm just saying what Lady Funk said, I didn't say that. So if you have a problem with what I'm repeating as a truth that I'm conveniently enabling, when she's directly referring to Karen Kraft being a man named Ken and nobody else, then take it up with Lady Funk, not me."
Carry on!
U
unregistered
Guest
doubleover
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2007
- Posts
- 682
This is medically referred to as "Bookshelf Butt."
A book has never been anywhere near that butt!
- Status
