COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Women only: In Defense of Abstinence...

Quoll said:
There's nothing sadder than a sub in search of a Domme.
Click to expand...

Amicus has had a rough 2012. Like his compatriots Vetteman and Garbage Can, he found out far too late that the object of his carnal desire actually had a penis.

Also like Vetteman, Amicus insists his conduct was technically not "homosexual" because he wasn't aware that his bed partner "Lola" had a penis until he woke up the next morning and discovered his new girlfriend sporting "morning wood".

Amicus immediately called the police and demanded that "she" be arrested for fraud and "unlawful concealment".
 
RobDownSouth said:
Amicus has had a rough 2012. Like his compatriots Vetteman and Garbage Can, he found out far too late that the object of his carnal desire actually had a penis.

Also like Vetteman, Amicus insists his conduct was technically not "homosexual" because he wasn't aware that his bed partner "Lola" had a penis until he woke up the next morning and discovered his new girlfriend sporting "morning wood".

Amicus immediately called the police and demanded that "she" be arrested for fraud and "unlawful concealment".
Click to expand...

Wait, really? With all the women-hating threads I figured he loved the cock.
 
according to amicus:


  • 'decent' women don't frequent these boards
  • we can only be loving, nurturing mothers if we stay at home and not venture out into the sacred male arena of 'the workplace' *gasp*
  • we must all be sweet and fluffy and sexually appealing but save ourselves for the only man we will marry
  • leave all that silly political and law and technical stuff to the men, 'cos that's what men are for - deciding what's best for us, and bake cookies, change nappies, and dress like doris day to keep house for our menfolk.

gee whiz, if only we'd all behave like that life would be just rooty tooty!
 
amicus said:
There are criminals in costumes as well as drag, sweety.

You really believe the shit that spills out of you, don't you? Such a good command of the language but no brain behind it, a waste.
Click to expand...


You really believe that YOUR code of morals is the proper code of morals and that any morals or activities outside of your code, are immoral and wrong, don't you?

Such a poor command of the language obviously caused by lack of a brain behind it. Typical.
 
Guys... he says that he's like 70 or some shit. So even if he's not just fucking with us, it's not like he matters...
 
I thought this information should have its own Post


[

Some of the wormost prominent scientists and physicians testified to a U.S. Senate committee that human life begins at conception:

A United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee invited experts to testify on the question of when life begins. All of the quotes from the following experts come directly from the official government record of their testimony.1

Dr. Alfred M. Bongioanni, professor of pediatrics and obstetrics at the University of Pennsylvania, stated:

“I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception…. I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and that any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life….

I am no more prepared to say that these early stages [of development in the womb] represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty…is not a human being. This is human life at every stage.”

Dr. Jerome LeJeune, professor of genetics at the University of Descartes in Paris, was the discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down syndrome. Dr. LeJeune testified to the Judiciary Subcommittee, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being.” He stated that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence.” He added, “Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”

Professor Hymie Gordon, Mayo Clinic: “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”

Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School: “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception…. Our laws, one function of which is to help preserve the lives of our people, should be based on accurate scientific data.”
Click to expand...


The First International Symposium on Abortion came to the following conclusion:

The changes occurring between implantation, a six-week embryo, a six-month fetus, a one-week-old child, or a mature adult are merely stages of development and maturation. The majority of our group could find no point in time between the union of sperm and egg, or at least the blastocyst stage, and the birth of the infant at which point we could say that this was not a human life.7

The Official Senate report on Senate Bill 158, the “Human Life Bill,” summarized the issue this way:

Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being—a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.8
Click to expand...
ld’s

Amicus for life:rose::rose:
 
Last edited:
great post amy


too bad it has nothing to do with abstinence programs and why they are such a failure


nice attempt to move the goal posts though
 
kbate said:
You really believe that YOUR code of morals is the proper code of morals and that any morals or activities outside of your code, are immoral and wrong, don't you?

Such a poor command of the language obviously caused by lack of a brain behind it. Typical.
Click to expand...

~~~

Now that I understand you and others really cannot grasp higher principles, I will be more gentle with you.

An objective, rational code of morality is not just mine, it is of all mankind, an unviersal discovery of what is good and bad for humankind. Really easy, I am puzled that you don't 'get' it. Those things that a good fo 'rman' are moral. those things that a bad for man are immoral. That is why one of the main tasks of learning of human education is to discover good and bad, right and wrong, and pattern one's life with the good and the right in mind.

I dabated a great man 160 IQ professors who had excellent command of the language, but were so immersedin Keynesian Economics that they could not rise above the muck.

Which is where you are at this stage of life, wallowing in the muck of nanny state socialism and subjective morality. As you acquire age and wisdom, you will see the error in your ways and, 'gulp' amicus was right all along.

guaranteed...take it to da bank


amicus:rose:
 
amicus said:
~~~

Now that I understand you and others really cannot grasp higher principles, I will be more gentle with you.

An objective, rational code of morality is not just mine, it is of all mankind, an unviersal discovery of what is good and bad for humankind. Really easy, I am puzled that you don't 'get' it. Those things that a good fo 'rman' are moral. those things that a bad for man are immoral. That is why one of the main tasks of learning of human education is to discover good and bad, right and wrong, and pattern one's life with the good and the right in mind.

I dabated a great man 160 IQ professors who had excellent command of the language, but were so immersedin Keynesian Economics that they could not rise above the muck.

Which is where you are at this stage of life, wallowing in the muck of nanny state socialism and subjective morality. As you acquire age and wisdom, you will see the error in your ways and, 'gulp' amicus was right all along.

guaranteed...take it to da bank


amicus:rose:
Click to expand...

You have yet to win a single arguement here,,, it's hard to see how you would win a " dabate" with anyone with half a brain anywhere else


point in question.. you have yet t able to prove your OP in any way... just alot of spouting hyberbole and unrelated opinions
 
chipbutty said:
according to amicus:


  • 'decent' women don't frequent these boards
  • we can only be loving, nurturing mothers if we stay at home and not venture out into the sacred male arena of 'the workplace' *gasp*
  • we must all be sweet and fluffy and sexually appealing but save ourselves for the only man we will marry
  • leave all that silly political and law and technical stuff to the men, 'cos that's what men are for - deciding what's best for us, and bake cookies, change nappies, and dress like doris day to keep house for our menfolk.

gee whiz, if only we'd all behave like that life would be just rooty tooty!
Click to expand...

!~~

If we could but reduce the size of govenment at all levels to one percent of what it is now, the resulting cost of government would decrease accordingly, taxes would almost disappear and it would no longer be necessary for wives and mothers to leave the home and join the rat race for bucks.

Now...what those freed women would do, is entirely up to them.Perhaps some would continue workng because they love their jobs, I dunno, you love your jobs ladies? The commute, the daycare, babysitter rush, rush, rush, tempo of your life?

I am conversng with a 22 year old woman in Ausrralia who tells me she has decided not to reproduce because of the population of the world and all the people in need.. I explained to her that there is no over population, no shortage of food, enough for everyone, food and space. And that is truth, and both can be documented.

I also explained to her that the natural imperative of human life is to reproduce, that our strongest drives and urges and psychological well being arises from giving birth and nurtuiring a child. That all humanvalues are illustrated and refined when we give care to a totally dependent baby. I told her that she is giving up her one and only chance at happiness in this world and for what, a flawed and faulty ideology that has been refuted time and time again.

I also emphasized that worldly events are irrelevant when it comes to her individual persons life style and choices and that she is foolish to let events in Bangladesh decide if she becomes a mother.

She is an ozzie lefty,but may have had a change in her life, so I await her reply.

Amicus one who cares about you:rose:
 
lol

" the only way a woman can ever be happy is if they quit their jobs and raise babies.. I should know... I'm an elderly conservative male"


too funny
 
amicus said:
Some of the wormost prominent scientists and physicians:
Click to expand...

tumblr_ma1u72M5bg1qal8n4.gif


What does "wormost" mean?

okay, I did an internet search on this word, just in case Ami was using some obscure and erudite nuance to make a point instead of misspelling a simple grade school word as if he was a dumb-assed motherfucker...and it seems that it's a quirky portmanteau of sorts, coined by a Ms. Jocelyn H. Chilvers who runs a gardening blog called The Art Garden.

Eventually, even the Lazy Gardener* has to put a bit of muscle into the project in order to harvest and distribute the wonderful "wormost"**.

**a made-up term: the result of cold composting supplemented with worms.
Click to expand...

comp3.jpg


comp4.jpg


comp5.jpg


http://jocelynsgarden.blogspot.com/2011/03/wormost-for-lazy-gardeners.html

Who'd a thunk it?

*raises glass* Thanks, Ami! Here's to wormost! :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SugarDaddy1
Are women really promiscuous?
Replies
9
Views
1K
policywank
policywank
butters
things women wish men would understand
18 19 20
Replies
482
Views
13K
Errorusernametaken
Errorusernametaken
BareAmy83
MEN: What is the *ultimate gift* a Woman can give a Man? What would *YOU* desire most?
2 3
Replies
73
Views
3K
RipleNStllWtr
RipleNStllWtr
ImiGirrst
Testosterone Pellets
Replies
12
Views
1K
4yourpleasureiam
4yourpleasureiam
girlsmiley
Menstrual sex sponge
2
Replies
27
Views
581
twister947
twister947
Back
Top