Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you want to read a very good story of BDSM read Pauline Reage's 'Story Of O.' there is a video version which is really good.
How can you be submissive if you won't do as you are told?
FWIW, I was thinking this thread was in Story Feedback. I'll confess to not knowing much about BDSM.
FWIW, I was thinking this thread was in Story Feedback. I'll confess to not knowing much about BDSM.
It was in Story Ideas. I was curious because I thought the thread title was funny. I just imagine a booming god voice saying something like that. I also imagine the person listening is crazy and it's only in their head.
I can do the booming god voice thing if anyone is interested. Just saying.![]()

That's my take as well, given the personalities who had weighed in early on. My guess is a mod with a light trigger finger moved it.
It was in Story Ideas. I was curious because I thought the thread title was funny. I just imagine a booming god voice saying something like that. I also imagine the person listening is crazy and it's only in their head.
If that was required, that would be the end of the relationship for me. For me, personally, that is a hard limit and I will not negotiate it. I'm submissive to one person and only that person and I will not be "shared." Just my thoughts on the matter.
What you're describing is called pimping (and it's the same basic dynamic whether money is exchanged or not). RL conensual subs are horrified by it because RL D/s relationships are not about pimping, they're about romantic roleplaying. Pimping is about a much baser form of predatory exploitation of fear, insecurity and Daddy/daughter psychology (as another poster said, infantilization*) in order to get a woman to cross boundaries they would or could not otherwise cross. It's essentially a variant of male dominance fantasy centred around manipulation / deception / intimidation, or IOW a variant of noncon fantasy, and the aspect of your readership that's into it is probably zeroing in on that.
It's not uncommon to find noncon fantasy overlapping with BDSM fantasy, of course. This very trope occurs in The Story of O, a classic of BDSM lit. But you should only employ it if you're not concerned about the RL niceties of your fiction's connection with actual BDSM practice.
(* And I mean, the language really isn't coincidental. A pimp is always "daddy" or some variant thereof because that's specifically the psychological role he's assuming / usurping. The hooker is usually a "bitch" because bestializing and devaluing her is a way of withholding fatherly approval, which has to be operative 90% of the time to make the predatory relationship work. The rare moments in which she's called "baby" or "baby girl" are all the more precious to her as a result, and part of the manipulation.)
More and more, I think you are a post-bot and not a human at all. Surely by now a human would have learned the lessons being offered by those who pointed out several times that copy-and-paste posting is considered rude behavior in these parts.I am. I am looking for someone that uses and abuses me. But is still able to treat me to all the finer things in life I was brought up with.
Your every desire in a baby girl just for you... pretty dresses just too short, nipples that hide through another but not completely, thigh highs that only you had no panties on the match, a little role play while pigtails still look believable...
I was brought up with ballet horse backing riding and trips to some very interesting places. I did well in school excelled and would rewarded with amazing concerts ballets musicals.
A little princess who becomes a cock craving Lolita in bed....
I need you!! your cock! your mind and control..
I just took a lot longer to say pretty much the same thing in another thread..![]()
Refusing to obey an order does not end a BDSM relationship make. Whoever and wherever that assumption came from is painful. Certainly a slave has every right to walk away from a Dominant if they feel that they are being continually pressured to do something that they don't like - the joys of the fact that it is not actual slavery and that there is this element of choice - but generally this doesn't happen as in any sensible D/S-orientated relationship, such boundaries are discussed before anything uncomfortable is brought up.
There is also a big difference in the Dominant requesting that of a slave and then dropping the matter if they are too uncomfortable, and continually pressuring them. Outside of a D/S relationship that would be intolerable. For example, me and my Master/boyfriend already established in the first few days of our relationship that both of us are exclusively monogamous and do not like the idea of playing with others, and are not massive fans of getting involved in the local BDSM community. So that was cleared up very early on, which is how it ideally should be done just like would be discussed in a relationship with no D/S qualities at all.
Yes, a Dominant can push the limits of their submissive/slave. But there is still always that traffic-light system; yes, maybe but I am uncomfortable and no. And the no should always be respected, otherwise the Dominant isn't really worthy of being called that. A Dominant respects the limits of those that they own, and either works with them to find new limits or won't go near the matter again. That's how it works outside of books.
I would feel very unempowered to be in a relationship where any change in my desires was pretty much given a "No. Furthermore, STFU." It's one thing to point out that pressure and emotional blackmail are not consensual behavior, but it's another to pretend that if a Dominant's desires change or assert themselves in ways the submissive can't get into they need to fuck off or they're a horrible monster with no right to be at a valid impasse.
I guess I've made it fairly clear that this IS on the table as far as me sharing anyone I'm going to be thought of as the boss of. I can't imagine feeling as though I were actually in charge if this was not an option for me to do what I felt prudent or entertaining with.