You know you wanna be a bigamist...

KillerMuffin

Seraphically Disinclined
Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Posts
25,603
If it were legal and they were for it as well, would you want more than one spouse? If so, same sex, opposite sex? How many? What would be your ideal polyamoric relationship/s?

Are you okay with bigamy, but not at your house? Only one honey for you. Why?

Are you against bigamy? Why?
 
A harem..

Women should have harems.

How many men does it take to satisfy a woman? I am talking about sexually. A guy cums once and he is done, at least for a while. A woman can go and go and go..*sigh*

Love to have a hundred men, not necessarily married to them;)

Cassidy,
thinking with lust, not reason...
 
I want two husbands. I have them all picked out, too. But there's that damned three foot no cock zone and one of them is not only wildly jealous, but he's not into sharing. I don't think the other one would be into sharing either, so that leaves me a monogamist. *sighs*

Fantasy is lovely, but it would never work out. Men are just not cooperative.
 
fair enough. now i'll go. well the thought of having more than one spouse is appealling...for obvious reasons, i honestly dont think that i would. i loves me wife and hell i may be she'll let me have a threesome one day and all will be right with the world:D
 
More than one Mother in Law.... you have GOT to be joking... lol:cool:

One wife and a harem of concubines maybe... If my lady reads this I am dead:)
 
One on one relationship is the best for stability, but juicylips maybe if you had a man that was more concerned with your enjoyment and good with his lips and tongue then his once a night would be plenty. hmmmmm
 
kiwiwolf said:
More than one Mother in Law.... you have GOT to be joking...

That's the best argument against bigamy I've seen yet.


No, there's no way I'd want two husbands. With my luck they'd both be sick at the same time and that would be enough to drive anyone insane.
 
Here are my thoughts on it:

1) No government has any business in saying who can marry who and that includes bigamy. The only restrictions I would have with regards to polygamy would be that for person A to have multiple spouses, they must formally notify all of their existing spouses, and that existing spouses have the choice of terminating their marriage rather than enter into a polygamous relationship if they choose to do so. Polygamy without the consent of all individuals, especially secret bigamy is deceit.

2) I don't think I would want a polygamous relationship, certainly I would want to share my wife with another man on any more than on a temporary basis (and only then if she wanted to). I would consider two women sharing me, but they would have to be very special women to pull that off, and I don't think it would be fair to them.

The only way I think that would work would be if we had a true triangle where it wasn't so much two women sharing me, as the women loved each other also - and of course loving me too, as well as my loving them equally. Of course, it would be the equal loving that would probably be the hard part; each person would probably have their preferences.
 
beauchampd said:
One on one relationship is the best for stability, but juicylips maybe if you had a man that was more concerned with your enjoyment and good with his lips and tongue then his once a night would be plenty. hmmmmm


You volunteering for this experiment??;)

My enjoyment can go on and on... might get those lips and tongue a little tired:)

Cassidy
 
juicylips, you haven't met the right man yet, if you're worried that a man's cumming once, then done for the night. SOME men can actually cum more than a few times right in a row. (not mentioning any names though).

STG, isn't #1 kinds of liek admitting that you are having an affair, and saying let's get divorced? in which case, it's not really bigomy, is it?
 
I would rather just not get married at all, and be able to fuck who I wanted to without guilt... :)
 
lobito said:
juicylips, you haven't met the right man yet, if you're worried that a man's cumming once, then done for the night. SOME men can actually cum more than a few times right in a row. (not mentioning any names though).



I know a man can cum more than once a night. I am talking about being able to keep me cumming. It seems once he is done, he is done, at least for a while. The thought of another man ready and willing to take up where he left off is what inspires me to a harem theory:)

Cassidy,
with pen and paper waiting for names;)
 
Cool!

lilminx said:
I would rather just not get married at all, and be able to fuck who I wanted to without guilt... :)

Hi!:D
 
I might like to be one of many husbands

If I was a harem husband, we could play rock/paper/scissor to see who has to listen to the wife complain about her day. (Of course, there is the off chance that one of us might actually give a damn.) We could take turns taking her out on dates, remembering anniversaries, buying her flowers, whispering sweet nothings in her ear--so the rest of us could live our lives. It could be like a time share condominium.

Yeah, sure, there would be less sex. Maybe. Or maybe she'd feel like a goddess all the time and you'd end up with more sex.

In any case, it would be a lot less work. It's the lazy man in me.
 
Re: I might like to be one of many husbands

horny_giraffe said:
.

Yeah, sure, there would be less sex. Maybe. Or maybe she'd feel like a goddess all the time and you'd end up with more sex.




More sex,,, definitely more....

well, if it was my harem;)

Cassidy
 
Dear congressman

... more sex?

Well, hot damm! Where do I sign up? Seriously, though,
I'll write my congressman first thing in the morning:

Dear Mr. ________;

Marriage. They say marriage is a sacred institution--the binding of two people into a sacred pact.

Well, let's see if you can follow my logic here. A marriage of one person is just impossible, but a marriage of two people is sacred. Therefore, doesn't it stand to reason that a marriage of three people is three times as sacred? Follow me?

Now imagine a marriage of four people--four times as sacred! Five people is FIVE TIMES AS SACRED! It doesn't take long to see where I'm going, now, does it? Think of the possibilities! We'll have sacred-ity cumming out of our ears! ...
 
Re: Dear congressman

horny_giraffe said:
... more sex?

Well, hot damm! Where do I sign up? Seriously, though,
I'll write my congressman first thing in the morning:

Dear Mr. ________;

Marriage. They say marriage is a sacred institution--the binding of two people into a sacred pact.

Well, let's see if you can follow my logic here. A marriage of one person is just impossible, but a marriage of two people is sacred. Therefore, doesn't it stand to reason that a marriage of three people is three times as sacred? Follow me?

Now imagine a marriage of four people--four times as sacred! Five people is FIVE TIMES AS SACRED! It doesn't take long to see where I'm going, now, does it? Think of the possibilities! We'll have sacred-ity cumming out of our ears! ...



I have to marry everyone in my harem??:confused:

No marriage, just lots of hot sex!

Still interested?

Cassidy;)
 
my lips and tongue will better for the exercise and I hope that they will improve their stamina...
 
beauchampd said:
my lips and tongue will better for the exercise and I hope that they will improve their stamina...

The only way your going to know is if you start the exercise program... right away;)

Cassidy
 
Sadly, my tongue can also use the exercise.

My ex g/f wouldn't let me, 'cept a couple of times--if you can believe that. She liked gettin' fingered, though.

I kind of liked doing it, though. Feels like cummin' home to mamma. Makes me feel like a man.

Speaking of harems, IRL there was a bit of overlap when my ex started seeing another guy. Maybe my "mistake" was not objecting enough. haha
 
Back
Top