While standing in the supermarket checkout line I happened to glance at a magazine (yes, I'm one of those cheap bastards that reads the magazines while standing in line) that had a headline about micro bikinis. This piqued my interest enough that I decided to look. It was a fashion mag, "Bizaar"(sp?), I think.
As I thumbed through it I was struck by a difference I have noticed before in magazines intended primarily for women. There appeared to be more advertising than articles, features, pictorals, or any other type of content. There were nearly ten pages of ads before the table of contents, and most of the pagess in the magazine were full page ads that had no page numbers. Even after I found the contents, I was unable to find the article I was looking for due to a lack of page numbers.
I have seen this phenomenon in other magazines for women. With men's magazines that would not be tolerated. I read "Penthouse", "Newsweek", "Popular Science", "American Rifleman", "Sports Illustrated", and other magazines intended for a mostly male audience. None of them have anywhere near the amount of advertising as women's magazines.
Why do you ladies put up with that? Are the ads in fashion magazines important to you? If publishers are expecting their magazine to be primarily advertising, maybe they should pay you to read them, rather than having readers pay for the privlege of reading the ads. It certainly seems unfair to me. Ladies, demand your money's worth from your magazines!
[This message has been edited by skibum (edited 05-11-2000).]
As I thumbed through it I was struck by a difference I have noticed before in magazines intended primarily for women. There appeared to be more advertising than articles, features, pictorals, or any other type of content. There were nearly ten pages of ads before the table of contents, and most of the pagess in the magazine were full page ads that had no page numbers. Even after I found the contents, I was unable to find the article I was looking for due to a lack of page numbers.
I have seen this phenomenon in other magazines for women. With men's magazines that would not be tolerated. I read "Penthouse", "Newsweek", "Popular Science", "American Rifleman", "Sports Illustrated", and other magazines intended for a mostly male audience. None of them have anywhere near the amount of advertising as women's magazines.
Why do you ladies put up with that? Are the ads in fashion magazines important to you? If publishers are expecting their magazine to be primarily advertising, maybe they should pay you to read them, rather than having readers pay for the privlege of reading the ads. It certainly seems unfair to me. Ladies, demand your money's worth from your magazines!
[This message has been edited by skibum (edited 05-11-2000).]