Wind Companies Losing Billions

The problem with icant,and many others who think along his lines is; they feel there is a "silver bullet answer". One "thing" that if implemented ,will make all the other problems go away. It's a special kind of stupid.
Yeah well, and the funny thing is he (and the ilk) always think their answer is that silver bullet. But they never look it all up to understand why theirs isn’t even close. Just like their hero, they like the lies. Rally around them even.

Facts are all measured by the size of the crowd at the rally. That’s what they believe as well. So sad.
 
Again, you mean you don’t have a reply because you know you didn’t do your full research (you NEVER do).


You like to find the first thing you search and just make a ton of assumptions instead of digging a little deeper.

You think too little. It’s because you can’t.
I’ve done a fair share of research on nuclear reactors but since the subject matter is well outside your intellectual capacity I won’t waste my time explaining it to you. Maybe someday they’ll design a nuclear deep fryer for you.

You still talk too much.
 
I’ve done a fair share of research on nuclear reactors but since the subject matter is well outside your intellectual capacity I won’t waste my time explaining it to you. Maybe someday they’ll design a nuclear deep fryer for you.
You have the uniform they let you keep, still smell like fries?

And research? We know what your “research” looks like. One word in, google returns the first entry and boom. Ican’t is done.
 
I’ve done a fair share of research on nuclear reactors but since the subject matter is well outside your intellectual capacity I won’t waste my time explaining it to you. Maybe someday they’ll design a nuclear deep fryer for you.

You still talk too much.
Please tell me all you know about "pebble bed reactors" or "SMB's"....I am dying to hear.

Whats the half life of plutonium again?

Where you going to put those approximate 260,000 spent fuel bundles?

you want to add to those 119 currently operating nukes, maybe find a solution to problems the existing ones have, before adding in new...
 
You have the uniform they let you keep, still smell like fries?

And research? We know what your “research” looks like. One word in, google returns the first entry and boom. Ican’t is done.
I was going on memory, unlike some people I don't sit on google buttons.
He doesn't use google, so you can only imagine what his research looks like....
 
Please tell me all you know about "pebble bed reactors" or "SMB's"....I am dying to hear.

Whats the half life of plutonium again?

Where you going to put those approximate 260,000 spent fuel bundles?

you want to add to those 119 currently operating nukes, maybe find a solution to problems the existing ones have, before adding in new...
SMRs /U235, placement very accommodating. Nuclear waste streams do not diminish with SMRs but placement and construction are easier to accommodate. 1/2 life of U 235 is lots and lots of years. Recycling radioactive waste is worth the research. Nuclear reactor physics is too fucking complicated to discuss on a porn site. Many of the safety issues have been addressed.
 
Back
Top