Will Derek Chauvin Be Released From Jail?

Here is the Coroner's Report.

George Floyd

From the report.

III. No life-threatening injuries identified

A. No facial, oral mucosal, or conjunctival petechiae
B. No injuries of anterior muscles of neck or laryngeal
structures
C. No scalp soft tissue, skull, or brain injuries
D. No chest wall soft tissue injuries, rib fractures (other
than a single rib fracture from CPR), vertebral column
injuries, or visceral injuries
E. Incision and subcutaneous dissection of posterior and
lateral neck, shoulders, back, flanks, and buttocks
negative for occult trauma
Read the very first statement in the report, which describes the method of death. (Hint - you skipped that part and went to the part that your friends online circled for you)
 
Check the title of the report you cited.

CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST COMPLICATING LAW ENFORCEMENTSUBDUAL, RESTRAINT, AND NECK COMPRESSION
That was added to an amended report. The part I quoted is the salient part, NO TRAUMA associated with restricted breathing. PERIOD.

Yeah, being restrained during arrest is stressful, too fucking bad. Maybe he shouldn't have resisted, ya think?
 
Here is the Coroner's Report.

George Floyd

From the report.

III. No life-threatening injuries identified

A. No facial, oral mucosal, or conjunctival petechiae
B. No injuries of anterior muscles of neck or laryngeal
structures
C. No scalp soft tissue, skull, or brain injuries
D. No chest wall soft tissue injuries, rib fractures (other
than a single rib fracture from CPR), vertebral column
injuries, or visceral injuries
E. Incision and subcutaneous dissection of posterior and
lateral neck, shoulders, back, flanks, and buttocks
negative for occult trauma
the police are charged to protect and serve. neither of those things happened and a murderer was convicted for murder.
 
That was added to an amended report. The part I quoted is the salient part, NO TRAUMA associated with restricted breathing. PERIOD.

Yeah, being restrained during arrest is stressful, too fucking bad. Maybe he shouldn't have resisted, ya think?
Chauvin's defense counsel would have had that report -- if it were exculpatory, Chauvin would not have been convicted.
 
No it wasn't. There's more than one video out there and the camera angle is everything.

Floyd died of massive heart failure due to a pre-existing condition aggravated by the ingestion of Meth and Fentanyl, NOT by any constriction of the air passages. PERIOD.

So the arrest was stressful. Maybe the worthless piece of shit shouldn't have resisted, ya think?

Good riddance to that walking shit bag.
The video doesn't show that Floyd had several substances in his system at the time of death, including fentanyl, norfentanyl, methamphetamine, and THC.
 
The video doesn't show that Floyd had several substances in his system at the time of death, including fentanyl, norfentanyl, methamphetamine, and THC.
Chauvin was convicted.
He appealed and lost (including multiple new tests on his heart tissue and other areas of his body)

He is serving his time.

Hope this helps 👍
 
The video doesn't show that Floyd had several substances in his system at the time of death, including fentanyl, norfentanyl, methamphetamine, and THC.
Correct. It shows the corrupt cop murdering Floyd and the reason he was convicted of murder and lost his appeal.

Does none of this register with you?
 
Chauvin's defense counsel would have had that report -- if it were exculpatory, Chauvin would not have been convicted.
Not if the sole intent of the trial and the jury was to put a cop in prison and have him killed.
 
So you say. Were you in the jury room?
If it weren't fair, the defense could've brought that up on their appeal.

They lost their appeals.

But sure....it all was a.conspiracy against him 👍🤣🤣
 
BS. That city was up in arms and on the verge of riot. That jury was probably scared shitless to do otherwise.

I'm as right wing as they come and I could see that Chauvin and his buddies had murdered the man. Sure, Floyd was no pillar of the community but it wasn't up to Chauvin and his friends to dish out roadside justice.
 
You MAGAts never distrusted the courts or American juries until 2016.

Not me. I learned early on not to trust the cops, the courts, or the media.

When I was a teenager I used to get mistaken for some other guy with frequency.

I was tackled by four cops at a mall because they thought I was him. They had to let me go and they were butt hurt as hell when they did.

I used to get stopped all the time when driving and a couple times the shitbag with a badge called me by the other guy's name. Then they'd make shit up and write me a ticket to justify the false stop. I fought every one of those tickets and won.

I enlisted and was away for a few years and when I got back I had one of the shitbags come at me at a park where I was fishing. Saving the long story I absolutely fucking destroyed this cocksucker. I took his gun and his badge and gave them to friends out of state. Funny thing here is the guy he thought I was got blamed and prosecuted but got let go when he had a solid alibi of being in jail at the time. The statute of limitations is way gone on this.

The last time I had a problem I was on the job and a cop comes up on me and wants to arrest me. For what I do not know. My employer intervened and Officer Fuckface did not know who my employer was. Officer Fuckface yelled at my employer and threatened him.

Turns out the Governor of California doesn't like being threatened and yelled at. :cool:

Office Fuckface was then an unemployed fuckface.

Yeah, so not a fan of the cops, not a fan of the courts, and not a fan of the media who say all sorts of shit with no care if it's true or not.
 
Last edited:
I'm as right wing as they come and I could see that Chauvin and his buddies had murdered the man. Sure, Floyd was no pillar of the community but it wasn't up to Chauvin and his friends to dish out roadside justice.
I saw the same video. I saw a man agitated, resisting, and possibly under the influence, being restrained with what appeared to be a standard knee hold applied to the shoulder and lower neck. I didn't recognize what I saw as murder. There is this emerging as well:

Alternate theory of George Floyd’s death​


What we know: Chauvin’s legal team filed a motion on Dec. 13 requesting to re-examine evidence, including fluid and heart samples, as part of a claim that Chauvin kneeling on Floyd’s neck was not what killed him, but rather a heart condition.

Chauvin claims he received "ineffective assistance of counsel" arguing in part that a forensic pathologist contacted his lawyer prior to his federal indictment, suggesting Floyd may have died from a heart condition.

The pathologist suggested the examination and testing of preserved samples taken during Floyd’s autopsy would support that opinion. However, Chauvin claims his lawyer didn't discuss the pathologists' opinion with him, or request further testing of the autopsy samples.

In a decision on Monday, a federal judge granted the motion allowing Chauvin’s legal team to analyze the samples and conduct specific tests.

What they’re saying: "Given the significant nature of the criminal case that Mr. Chauvin was convicted of, and given that the discovery that Mr. Chauvin seeks could support Dr. Schaetzel’s opinion of how Mr. Floyd died, the Court finds that there is good cause to allow Mr. Chauvin to take the discovery that he seeks. Accordingly, the Court grants Mr. Chauvin’s motion," the court document reads.

https://www.fox9.com/news/derek-chauvin-george-floyds-heart-tissue-judge-rule

Remember the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt." If the findings uphold the verdict, then have him serve out his time.
 
Also, I have yet to hear of anyone volunteering to be held down in the same manner as Floyd to prove their theory that this wouldn't kill anyone.
 
Also, I have yet to hear of anyone volunteering to be held down in the same manner as Floyd to prove their theory that this wouldn't kill anyone.
It's all right there in the Coroner's Report.

Revisiting the quote you lifted out of the report. First of all that was added to the report after the fact and it is alleged that that addition was done so under duress from the prosecution. Be that as it may, the problem remains that that quote is an OPINION rendered by the Coroner and OPINIONS are subjective. There is NO science in the report that supports that opinion, none. And just as you jumped on it as being substantive I can imagine a jury being swayed on an emotionally charged case.

Further, the police training officer perjured herself when testifying that that from of restraint ISN'T taught in the academy. That is an out and out lie, it is a basic method of controlling a resisting arrestee.

Polyshitforbrains points out that the verdict survived appeal. Of course it did. Without glaring errors in the trial no appellate court is going to overturn jury's verdict. It is not the appellate courts job to retry the case on evidence.
 
Back
Top