Ishmael said:Beginning to understand why I have that idiot on ignore?![]()
Carry on.
Ishmael
I've only got one person on Iggy and it isn't for being an idiot.
It's fun to play with these guys now and then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ishmael said:Beginning to understand why I have that idiot on ignore?![]()
Carry on.
Ishmael
Ishmael said:Beginning to understand why I have that idiot on ignore?![]()
Carry on.
Ishmael
Gringao said:The US accepted the Emperor's station only after the Japanese surrendered unconditionally and his precise status could be determined in the context of an occupation government. The demand was, and never wavered from, an unconditional surrender of the Japanese to Allied forces.
The US could have accepted this precondition, but it may well have left a great deal of political uncertainty once the occupation of Japan was under way. As it was, the unconditional surrender was made by the Emperor (via recorded message), thus confirming his subordinate status once the Allies came ashore.
Gringao said:The Japanese were suing for peace, but they never offered an unconditional surrender, as the US had demanded. At minimum, they put on the predcondition that the Emperor be given immunity and allowed to continue in his position at the head of government.
miles said:I love it when a dickhead who is on everyone's ignore list keeps posting like people are listening.
Reminds me of someone trying to talk with a sock stuffed into their mouth.
miles said:I love it when a dickhead who is on everyone's ignore list keeps posting like people are listening.
Reminds me of someone trying to talk with a sock stuffed into their mouth.
Gringao said:I've only got one person on Iggy and it isn't for being an idiot.
It's fun to play with these guys now and then.
Veryknowing said:Wrong again.
The demand for "unconditional surrender" may not have wavered in public, but it certainly wasn't set in reality. There are historical documents to prove this, and witnesses.
The USA had NO CHOICE but to accept that single condition. If they hadn't, then it wouldn't have mattered a damn if the USA nuked Japan to a smoking glazed cinder, the Japanese would've fought to the bitter end, and not even the Emperor could've prevented that. If the USA had harmed the Emperor in any way, or tried to remove him from his position as Emperor, the whole country would've fought to the last man.
The same is true in Japan today. In a thousand years of Japanese history, not even the shoguns were foolish enough to try such an action against the Emperor.
Veryknowing said:Hey, isn't odd how all of sudden, now we have Ismael, Miles, Gringao, all jumping to Ham Murabi's rescue now?
Ishmael said:It's those government welfare programs miles. They think they're 'entitled'.
Ishmael
miles said:Speaking of entitlements, here's RDS to round out my ignore list!
Ishmael said:It's those government welfare programs miles. They think they're 'entitled'.
Ishmael
Veryknowing said:It's funny that you carry on like that with no idea of who I am. LOL![]()

Gringao said:I'm willing to listen, but the fact is that the precondition of retaining the Emperor was the reason the US rejected Japanese overtures for peace.
Gringao said:As a political reality, that may well be the case, but the Emperor had to be subordinate to the occupation authority. If he had been retained as a precondition, that subordinate position would not have been clear-cut.
RobDownSouth said:Get under his skin enough and he'll accuse you of being a Bob_Bytchin alt.![]()

Gringao said:The USA accepted the status of Hirohito, but not as a precondition. There's a big, big difference. If you cannot or will not see that, there's no point in continuing the discussion.
Gringao said:Goodbye.
Gringao said:Repetition of baseless non-sequiturs is no substitute for rational discussion. If you feel that posting last makes you the "winner," be my guest.