Why Islam is disrespected

[Borscht]

....and strap bombs to the chests of women and kids and send 'em out to blow people up.

I keep coming across this ridiculous claim that children are being used as suicide bombers.

Is it a lie of your own invention, or is it a new line of propaganda that the Israelis and Americans are trying to push ?

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

I keep coming across this ridiculous claim that children are being used as suicide bombers.

Is it a lie of your own invention, or is it a new line of propaganda that the Israelis and Americans are trying to push ?

It's a new line of propaganda that they're trying to push.

Of course the claim is ridiculous. They can't post anything to really back it up. It's bullshit.

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

I expected someone to make an ignorant comment similar to that.

Can you prove that the U.S. Military sets out to kill noncombatants and destroy civilian installations?

Yes, they do deliberately target noncombatants and deliberately destroy civilian installations.

What do you think Dresden was? Why destroy cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki? These were not valid military targets....they were cities full of civilians.

Now go fuck yourself.

Good one!

Kudos to the Japanese girl!

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Yes, they do deliberately target noncombatants and deliberately destroy civilian installations.

What do you think Dresden was? Why destroy cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki? These were not valid military targets....they were cities full of civilians.

Now go fuck yourself.

First he needs a microscope to find himself.

 

[Borscht]

I expected someone to make an ignorant comment similar to that.

Can you prove that the U.S. Military sets out to kill noncombatants and destroy civilian installations?

Hiroshima, Falluja, etc.

 

[Ham Murabi]

Hiroshima, Falluja, etc.

Hiroshima! How clever. Are you going to claim next that the residents of Hiroshima were the only civilians killed in WWII?

 

[Veryknowing]

Hiroshima! How clever. Are you going to claim next that the residents of Hiroshima were the only civilians killed in WWII?

I'm very tempted to invite Lovelynice in to take you on that argument. She'd hand you your head.

Hiroshima, Nagsaki, Dresden, Hamburg, all these cities were not valid military targets.

There may have been valid military targets within those cities, but it was the cities which were targeted, meaning that the civilians were targeted.

Europeans already have learned from experience that the crimes committed against an enemy in one war will eventually be visited back upon you in another war. That's something that the USA still hasn't learnt because American history is too short in comparison.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I'm very tempted to invite Lovelynice in to take you on that argument. She'd hand you your head.

Hiroshima, Nagsaki, Dresden, Hamburg, all these cities were not valid military targets.

There may have been valid military targets within those cities, but it was the cities which were targeted, meaning that the civilians were targeted.

Europeans already have learned from experience that the crimes committed against an enemy in one war will eventually be visited back upon you in another war. That's something that the USA still hasn't learnt because American history is too short in comparison.

What Ham Murabi hasn't told you is that he got his history degree from Trailer Park U.

 

[miles]

I'm very tempted to invite Lovelynice in to take you on that argument. She'd hand you your head.

Hiroshima, Nagsaki, Dresden, Hamburg, all these cities were not valid military targets.

There may have been valid military targets within those cities, but it was the cities which were targeted, meaning that the civilians were targeted.

Europeans already have learned from experience that the crimes committed against an enemy in one war will eventually be visited back upon you in another war. That's something that the USA still hasn't learnt because American history is too short in comparison.

Why don't you explain to us how many casualties there would have been on both sides if the Allies had invaded Japan instead of dropping two big ones on them.

 

[Veryknowing]

What Ham Murabi hasn't told you is that he got his history degree from Trailer Park U.

So I noticed.

I sent a PM to Lovelynice with the link to the post.

Ham Murabi, you better start doing your research because you can bet that Lovelynice already has.

 

[Veryknowing]

Why don't you explain to us how many casualties there would have been on both sides if the Allies had invaded Japan instead of dropping two big ones on them.

I've got better questions for you

1) Why don't you explain why there would've been any necessity to invade Japan considering that the Japanese government had been offering surrender long before the bombs were actually dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The USA would only have had to accept that surrender and there was no reasonable need to massacre hundreds of thousands of civilians by deliberately targeting them.

2) What part of the Geneva Convention and Internation Law got you so confused that you are unable to recognize the distinction between attacking a valid military target within a city and targeting the entire city full of civilians?

 

[miles]

I've got better questions for you

1) Why don't you explain why there would've been any necessity to invade Japan considering that the Japanese government had been offering surrender long before the bombs were actually dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

2) What part of the Geneva Convention and Internation Law got you so confused that you are unable to recognize the distinction between attacking a valid militay target within a city and targeting the entire city full of civilians?

You need to apply for a name change.

Dumbass.

Are you a Brit?

 

[Veryknowing]

You need to apply for a name change.

Dumbass.

Are you a Brit?

Childish insults, but no answers.

So can you the answer the quesion, Miles, or are you just full of shit again?

 

[Ishmael]

You need to apply for a name change.

Dumbass.

Are you a Brit?

Nah, just another LT/Bob_Bytchin/etc. alt.

Ishmael

 

[miles]

Childish insults, but no answers.

So can you the answer the quesion, Miles, or are you just full of shit again?

Excuse me, dumbfuck, but wasn't it you who didn't answer my direct question? You will now be talking to yourself, as you're about to join other geniuses like LT on ignore.

AMF

 

[miles]

Nah, just another LT/Bob_Bytchin/etc. alt.

Ishmael

Jesus Retard Christ. Just what this place needs, another political moron. Where do these douche bags come from?

Let's hope they're incapable of reproducing.

 

[Gringao]

I've got better questions for you

1) Why don't you explain why there would've been any necessity to invade Japan considering that the Japanese government had been offering surrender long before the bombs were actually dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The USA would only have had to accept that surrender and there was no reasonable need to massacre hundreds of thousands of civilians by deliberately targeting them.

2) What part of the Geneva Convention and Internation Law got you so confused that you are unable to recognize the distinction between attacking a valid military target within a city and targeting the entire city full of civilians?

The Japanese were suing for peace, but they never offered an unconditional surrender, as the US had demanded. At minimum, they put on the predcondition that the Emperor be given immunity and allowed to continue in his position at the head of government.

 

[Veryknowing]

Nah, just another LT/Bob_Bytchin/etc. alt.

Ishmael

LOL.

Another paranoid delusional twit.

It's real funny that you go on about alts, when all of a sudden MIles and Ishmael come charging to the "rescue" of Ham Murabi.

Only to demonstrate how fucking useless and stupid you are because you can only insult but can't bring real facts to support Ham Murabi's bullshit excuses.

Now try harder children.

 

[miles]

The Japanese were suing for peace, but they never offered an unconditional surrender, as the US had demanded. At minimum, they put on the predcondition that the Emperor be given immunity and allowed to continue in his position at the head of government.

You're talking to a wall. This clown is in lala land. Fantasy is his reality.

 

[Ham Murabi]

I'm very tempted to invite Lovelynice in to take you on that argument. She'd hand you your head.

Hiroshima, Nagsaki, Dresden, Hamburg, all these cities were not valid military targets.

There may have been valid military targets within those cities, but it was the cities which were targeted, meaning that the civilians were targeted.

Europeans already have learned from experience that the crimes committed against an enemy in one war will eventually be visited back upon you in another war. That's something that the USA still hasn't learnt because American history is too short in comparison.

And don't forget London. No shit civilians were targeted, on both sides, and it started well before the U.S. was involved.
Europeans already have learned ... what? You familiar with the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812? It appears we learned the lesson well before you did. It's better to give than receive.
As for you other post about Japan's offer to surrender before the bombs were dropped, perhaps you weren't aware the terms was "unconditional," and Japan wasn't will to do that even after the first bomb was dropped. Or maybe you thought the bombs were dropped on the same day, instead of six days apart.

 

[Veryknowing]

The Japanese were suing for peace, but they never offered an unconditional surrender, as the US had demanded. At minimum, they put on the predcondition that the Emperor be given immunity and allowed to continue in his position at the head of government.

Gringao, maybe you are really as stupid as you seem.

The Japanese government only ever had one condition in their surrender, the Emperor's status must be protected.

Guess what condition the uSA agreed to? The same one; the Emperor's status would be protected.

They accepted the same condition that had been offered all along.

Therefore the war could've been ended long before any dropping of the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Besides which, cities are NOT valid military targets and NEVER HAVE BEEN.

 

[miles]

Veryknowing
This message is hidden because Veryknowing is on your ignore list.


Now you're starting to make sense.

 

[Veryknowing]

You're talking to a wall. This clown is in lala land. Fantasy is his reality.

Miles talking about himself again.


It's obvious that intelligent argument is beyond you.


Also it seems that you've taken to talking to yourself

Veryknowing
This message is hidden because Veryknowing is on your ignore list.
Now you're starting to make sense.

Miles, are you getting confused as to which alt that you're using?

 

[Gringao]

Gringao, maybe you are really as stupid as you seem.

The Japanese government only ever had one condition in their surrender, the Emperor's status must be protected.

Guess what condition the uSA agreed to? The same one; the Emperor's status would be protected.

They accepted the same condition that had been offered all along.

Therefore the war could've been ended long before any dropping of the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Besides which, cities are NOT valid military targets and NEVER HAVE BEEN.

The US accepted the Emperor's station only after the Japanese surrendered unconditionally and his precise status could be determined in the context of an occupation government. The demand was, and never wavered from, an unconditional surrender of the Japanese to Allied forces.

The US could have accepted this precondition, but it may well have left a great deal of political uncertainty once the occupation of Japan was under way. As it was, the unconditional surrender was made by the Emperor (via recorded message), thus confirming his subordinate status once the Allies came ashore.

 

[Ishmael]

The US accepted the Emperor's station only after the Japanese surrendered unconditionally and his precise status could be determined in the context of an occupation government. The demand was, and never wavered from, an unconditional surrender of the Japanese to Allied forces.

The US could have accepted this precondition, but it may well have left a great deal of political uncertainty once the occupation of Japan was under way. As it was, the unconditional surrender was made by the Emperor (via recorded message), thus confirming his subordinate status once the Allies came ashore.

Beginning to understand why I have that idiot on ignore?

Carry on.

Ishmael