why don't we make a shot to sterilize sperms?

[neci]

seems you would save on birth control.

there's probably one out there i don't know of.

it could be injected directly into the seminal vesicle.

 

[Adre]

Pardon me if I don't want a needle in my dick.

 

[lovecraft68]

The real reason?

First off, even though we are in the so called modern era, many men seem to think BC falls on the women.

2 and most important, guys are pussies and wouldn't want a shot anywhere near their precious cock.

I know a couple that have three kids, one planned and two oops because Mr Stud is to afraid to go get a vas even though she has had bad reactions to BC and even gotten sick on several occasions, but oh, no he can't do that.

3, even though it would be much easier and safer to avoid "accidents".... see number one, its the woman's problem.

Edited to add see above post. But its okay for women to get IUDs and go through god knows what.

Grow up and stop being a chicken shit.

I had a vas twelve years ago, yes, the shot in the nuts was unpleasant and feeling the doctor tug around down there was no fun, but a life time of worry free sex was worth it.

so one more time, grow up and man up.

 

[evesdream]

I don't think injections like that would go over well. Maybe some sort of high absorption spermicidal cream that he rubs into the skin once a day would work out a little better.

 

[neci]

i could see creams being a hit. it could even be rubbed on unknowingly. applied to condoms as a "filler."

 

[evesdream]

i could see creams being a hit. it could even be rubbed on unknowingly. applied to condoms as a "filler."

I don't know why scientists and inventors don't consult the GB more often.

 

[neci]

I don't know why scientists and inventors don't consult the GB more often.

they are too busy wanking over in am pics. plus, you know they will just end up stealing the material. writing it off as their own.

 

[lovetoread]

I am so glad I no longer have to worry about wayward sperm.

 

[KRCummings]

The male body is constantly making sperm. You'd need a shot every day. Maybe even more often.
Although I'm all in favor of sticking needles into a mans privates I can't in good conscience say that this method is better than taking a tiny pill.

 

[eyer]

Friggin' progressive women always looking to oppress a man's body...

 

[rosco rathbone]

seems you would save on birth control.

there's probably one out there i don't know of.

it could be injected directly into the seminal vesicle.

"the seminal vesicle" lol. You're the only person besides me to ever use that term.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The real reason?

First off, even though we are in the so called modern era, many men seem to think BC falls on the women.

2 and most important, guys are pussies and wouldn't want a shot anywhere near their precious cock.

I know a couple that have three kids, one planned and two oops because Mr Stud is to afraid to go get a vas even though she has had bad reactions to BC and even gotten sick on several occasions, but oh, no he can't do that.

3, even though it would be much easier and safer to avoid "accidents".... see number one, its the woman's problem.

Edited to add see above post. But its okay for women to get IUDs and go through god knows what.

Grow up and stop being a chicken shit.

I had a vas twelve years ago, yes, the shot in the nuts was unpleasant and feeling the doctor tug around down there was no fun, but a life time of worry free sex was worth it.

so one more time, grow up and man up.

Jesus christ it's zumi jr. ever think maybe some guys might want to have kids??? Just throwing that out there derpina.

That leaves you with barriers like condoms, IUDs, cervical caps etc and ovulation control through hormone therapy, the pill/patch/shot. They all have their variations, pro's and cons...what the fuck ever.

The bottom line is unless your done having kids there isn't really any practical form of male birth control available.....making it a pretty good reason that in most cases pregnancy and thus prevention of, a women's issue. Fair? No...but as of right now it's the best and only option we have. Working on it, but we aren't there yet. So we have to deal.

Here is another good reason.

Women have 110% absolute and total legal control over human reproduction in this country at least. From consent to sex until the child is born and independent of mom, dad doesn't have a mother fuckin' say so in shit. Not a word.....why should it be his responsibility? Hell if things were really fair women would have to get prior written agreement to conceiving a child (or marriage licence) in order to go after a guy for child support. Otherwise it should be ALL her 110%...whew! go girl power!!

Women are from start to finish in absolute and total control, as they should be. But guess what motherfucker, it comes with responsibilities too....be it making HIM put a condom on or making sure she takes her pill every day at the same time it is still 110% her responsibility to make sure she doesn't get pregnant.

Buck stops with her, the ultimate responsibility is thus hers.

The ONLY time it is NOT her responsibility would be considered rape.

The male body is constantly making sperm. You'd need a shot every day. Maybe even more often.
Although I'm all in favor of sticking needles into a mans privates I can't in good conscience say that this method is better than taking a tiny pill.

That's the problem with male BC....lot easier to control the release of at most a few eggs, it's a pretty simple trigger we obviously learned to safety a while ago. Guys make and recycle sperm by the billions...and they are persistent little fuckers too...

They are working on one but the problem is how it interacts with a lot of dailty eats...like too much sugar? No alcohol at ALL. etc etc any of these physiological shifts can cause failure.... Boom sperm production starts and OOOPS!! So it's not quite reliable..but it's pseudo working so were getting close.

I would be all about taking a pill if it were effective, shit....anti child support pills? You god damn right...

 

[hd8001]

They were developing a shot in India that would last for ten years it was called RSIG or something like that it was low cost also. It could be deactivated with another shot when you were ready. Being a male I would have definitely taken something that to have control over my fertility.

 

[eyer]

Being a male I would have definitely taken something that to have control over my fertility.

Your "fertility"?



You be one of dem femenized girlyboys...

...ain't ya?

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Nothing a good dose of x-ray radiation can't handle.

 

[Sean]

Because very few women would trust the "yeah, I've had the shot, hon" line.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I imagine Hillary when I'm having sex and the sperm commit suicide.

 

[Busybody]

Jesus christ it's zumi jr. ever think maybe some guys might want to have kids??? Just throwing that out there derpina.

That leaves you with barriers like condoms, IUDs, cervical caps etc and ovulation control through hormone therapy, the pill/patch/shot. They all have their variations, pro's and cons...what the fuck ever.

The bottom line is unless your done having kids there isn't really any practical form of male birth control available.....making it a pretty good reason that in most cases pregnancy and thus prevention of, a women's issue. Fair? No...but as of right now it's the best and only option we have. Working on it, but we aren't there yet. So we have to deal.

Here is another good reason.

Women have 110% absolute and total legal control over human reproduction in this country at least. From consent to sex until the child is born and independent of mom, dad doesn't have a mother fuckin' say so in shit. Not a word.....why should it be his responsibility? Hell if things were really fair women would have to get prior written agreement to conceiving a child (or marriage licence) in order to go after a guy for child support. Otherwise it should be ALL her 110%...whew! go girl power!!

Women are from start to finish in absolute and total control, as they should be. But guess what motherfucker, it comes with responsibilities too....be it making HIM put a condom on or making sure she takes her pill every day at the same time it is still 110% her responsibility to make sure she doesn't get pregnant.

Buck stops with her, the ultimate responsibility is thus hers.

The ONLY time it is NOT her responsibility would be considered rape.



That's the problem with male BC....lot easier to control the release of at most a few eggs, it's a pretty simple trigger we obviously learned to safety a while ago. Guys make and recycle sperm by the billions...and they are persistent little fuckers too...

They are working on one but the problem is how it interacts with a lot of dailty eats...like too much sugar? No alcohol at ALL. etc etc any of these physiological shifts can cause failure.... Boom sperm production starts and OOOPS!! So it's not quite reliable..but it's pseudo working so were getting close.

I would be all about taking a pill if it were effective, shit....anti child support pills? You god damn right...

would you stop with WAR n PEESE length responses

its hard on the ice

 

[neci]

"the seminal vesicle" lol. You're the only person besides me to ever use that term.

i was looking at medical diagrams of the male anatomy. it's a fascinating word. center for the birth of sperm. that place must be a hot house.

 

[thirty]

seems you would save on birth control.

there's probably one out there i don't know of.

it could be injected directly into the seminal vesicle.

Most of men want to keep reproductivity even they have done with kids, just in case, you know.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Because very few women would trust the "yeah, I've had the shot, hon" line.

Why not? Guys have to trust women when they say it....nothing but their word to go on, why would this be any different?

And we have more to be worried about...moms are less likely to pay their child support

"The U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent data shows that non-custodial mothers are far less likely to pay the support they owe than are non-custodial fathers. So fathers pay 61.7% of what they owe while mothers pay only 54.6%. Forty-two percent of fathers pay everything they owe but only 34.1% of mothers do." http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/2...s-less-likely-than-dads-to-pay-child-support/


Hell courts make 1.6 million guys a year pay child support for kids that aren't even theirs!!!

I think it would be awesome if guys could get a pill/shot...

"I'm pregnant !!"

"ORLY?? Well you enjoy that kid and whoever you made it with, I'm out ."

 

[neci]

Why not? Guys have to trust women when they say it....nothing but their word to go on, why would this be any different?

And we have more to be worried about...moms are less likely to pay their child support

"The U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent data shows that non-custodial mothers are far less likely to pay the support they owe than are non-custodial fathers. So fathers pay 61.7% of what they owe while mothers pay only 54.6%. Forty-two percent of fathers pay everything they owe but only 34.1% of mothers do. http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/2...s-less-likely-than-dads-to-pay-child-support/


Hell courts make 1.6 million guys a year pay child support for kids that aren't even theirs!!!

I think it would be awesome if guys could get a pill/shot...

"I'm pregnant !!"

"ORLY?? Well you enjoy that kid and whoever you made it with, I'm out ."

would you prefer an injectable or topical cream? topical being a rectal massage.

 

[doctor_insanus]

Needles and seminal vesicles should never be mentioned in the same sentence.

Besides, you should only have active, top-quality sperms swimming in your belly. Or... wherever.

 

[BotanyBoy]

would you prefer an injectable or topical cream? topical being a rectal massage.

Injectable...get the shit over with.

 

[neci]

Needles and seminal vesicles should never be mentioned in the same sentence.

Besides, you should only have active, top-quality sperms swimming in your belly. Or... wherever.

i do not discriminate against sterile sperm.