Yes, you oversimplify things....I get it."Getting gasoline is more difficult than getting guns"
Quick, someone send out two ten year olds with a handful cash. One has to buy a gun, the other needs to grab a jerry can of gas. Let's see which one has an easier time.
Steel Peener Substitutes embiggen the lowliest beta male. For example, you sound pretty short and are probably overweight. You pop the final circuit breaker inside your head one day and go on a rampage. By yourself, a single average-sized woman in America would likely kick you in the balls immediately and leave you blubbering for mommy within a minute. But hooo-ha, buy yourself a Kewl AR-15 and people are gonna respect you now, right? Right?
"Cars vs. Steel Peener Substitutes"? Really, again? You need some new material.
We all also know that the primary purpose of cars is not to kill people. But we also understand your need to deflect attention away from guns by any means necessary.
If cars killing more people than guns doesn't concern you, then don't pretend the issue is about people losing their lives.
We’ve had to deal with the risks of traffic and cars for a century. The increasing risk of shopping, worshipping or learning is new.
The probability (in America) of getting murdered by a gun is almost half the probability of getting killed by a vehicle.
Cars don’t drive through grocery stores, schools or churches. When they start, maybe then you’ll care to see actions taken to reduce them.
Thanks for pointing out guns even have the enormous advantage of getting just about anywhere, while vehicles cannot. So despite being designed to be as lethal as possible and the ability to be taken pretty much anywhere, cars are still much more dangerous.
^^Who let this simpleton/ retard in here?
LOL, No Select fire means "select fire". What the selections are is dependant upon the weapon.
*chuckles*
I've read it claims to be from Alberta....maybe one of those "Bountiful" people got lost.
"Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."
So you can't answer the question.....no surprise there...."Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."
"Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."
Fish in the barrel it really shouldn't be that easy.
This still doesn't explain the statistics.......but feel free to try again....
Not my point. Point is most people can in fact regulate themselves, with booze, gambling and yes firearms. You stated that 2A advocates should be on the receiving end of a weapon and were expendable. Listen to that language and tell what exactly makes you judge and executioner? Same shot that goes through the sickos mind. Hence my comment you self identified. Thanks. 25 years as an armed professional doesn’t take lectures and judgement from people spewing language like that.
Dude, you shouldn't talk about things you have to use an internet definition to define. Its obvious you have no personal experience or knowledge of this topic.
Fuzzy’s gross misunderstanding of select fire rifles is common among the “ban assault weapons” crowd.
There is only one problem,Boomer, I am not in the ban firearms crowd. I am in the education and training crowd, as a proud owner of numerous firearms, I understand the importance of that.
*chuckles*
Ok, sorry I misrepresented you as a gun grabber. I stand corrected. Wrt your questions, Hunter remains under federal investigation, the president and First Lady continue to reject their grandchild, and Disney no longer governs the CFTOD (special district). Haven’t been following CRT lately but it’s my understanding that efforts to inject it into school curriculum are stalling in many parts of the country.
