Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

[Grendelpuppy]

Glad you agree. Guns cause harm beyond that of other accessible weapons.

A can of gasoline works even better.

 

[TastySuckToy]

A can of gasoline works even better.

shhh...you can literally burn down an entire city with that. Don't want to scare those who think guns are WMDs

 

[ll74]

A can of gasoline works even better.

Lots of things work better. But none are easier or accessible. Maybe check out Arson stats for more

 

[TastySuckToy]

Lots of things work better. But none are easier or accessible. Maybe check out Arson stats for more

"Getting gasoline is more difficult than getting guns"

Quick, someone send out two ten year olds with a handful cash. One has to buy a gun, the other needs to grab a jerry can of gas. Let's see which one has an easier time.

 

[ll74]

"Getting gasoline is more difficult than getting guns"

Quick, someone send out two ten year olds with a handful cash. One has to buy a gun, the other needs to grab a jerry can of gas. Let's see which one has an easier time.

Yes, you oversimplify things....I get it.

 

[RobDownSouth]

isnt is great that anti's blame the method and device rather than the person and personal choice?

Steel Peener Substitutes embiggen the lowliest beta male. For example, you sound pretty short and are probably overweight. You pop the final circuit breaker inside your head one day and go on a rampage. By yourself, a single average-sized woman in America would likely kick you in the balls immediately and leave you blubbering for mommy within a minute. But hooo-ha, buy yourself a Kewl AR-15 and people are gonna respect you now, right? Right?

we wont mention how many soldiers were killed by VBIED's in Iraq and Afghanistan. But lets not blame or hold responsible, the Taliban or Isis for any of that. Lets blame the cars and car companies.

"Cars vs. Steel Peener Substitutes"? Really, again? You need some new material.

We all know that dying in a car crash is more likely than dying by firearm, so I won't even touch that.

We all also know that the primary purpose of cars is not to kill people. But we also understand your need to deflect attention away from guns by any means necessary.

 

[TastySuckToy]

We all also know that the primary purpose of cars is not to kill people. But we also understand your need to deflect attention away from guns by any means necessary.

If cars killing more people than guns doesn't concern you, then don't pretend the issue is about people losing their lives.

 

[phrodeau]

If cars killing more people than guns doesn't concern you, then don't pretend the issue is about people losing their lives.

We’ve had to deal with the risks of traffic and cars for a century. The increasing risk of shopping, worshipping or learning is new.

 

[TastySuckToy]

We’ve had to deal with the risks of traffic and cars for a century. The increasing risk of shopping, worshipping or learning is new.

The probability (in America) of getting murdered by a gun is almost half the probability of getting killed by a vehicle.

Let me put that another way: you are almost twice as likely to get killed by something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible, when compared to something designed to be as lethal as possible.

Let me say that again: guns, despite being designed to be as lethal as possible, cannot match the fatality rate of cars, which are designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

In other words, something that is designed to kill can't match the killing rate of something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

If you are worried about getting murdered by a gun, but don't worry about getting killed by a vehicle, you're delusional and don't understand statistical probability.

Most people don't. That's why lotteries make a fortune.

 

[ll74]

The probability (in America) of getting murdered by a gun is almost half the probability of getting killed by a vehicle.

Let me put that another way: you are almost twice as likely to get killed by something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible, when compared to something designed to be as lethal as possible.

Let me say that again: guns, despite being designed to be as lethal as possible, cannot match the fatality rate of cars, which are designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

In other words, something that is designed to kill can't match the killing rate of something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

If you are worried about getting murdered by a gun, but don't worry about getting killed by a vehicle, you're delusional and don't understand statistical probability.

Most people don't. That's why lotteries make a fortune.

A vehicle killing you is an accident.

A gun killing you is not.

 

[phrodeau]

The probability (in America) of getting murdered by a gun is almost half the probability of getting killed by a vehicle.

Let me put that another way: you are almost twice as likely to get killed by something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible, when compared to something designed to be as lethal as possible.

Let me say that again: guns, despite being designed to be as lethal as possible, cannot match the fatality rate of cars, which are designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

In other words, something that is designed to kill can't match the killing rate of something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

If you are worried about getting murdered by a gun, but don't worry about getting killed by a vehicle, you're delusional and don't understand statistical probability.

Most people don't. That's why lotteries make a fortune.

Cars don’t drive through grocery stores, schools or churches. When they start, maybe then you’ll care to see actions taken to reduce them.

 

[TastySuckToy]

Cars don’t drive through grocery stores, schools or churches. When they start, maybe then you’ll care to see actions taken to reduce them.

Thanks for pointing out guns even have the enormous advantage of getting just about anywhere, while vehicles cannot. So despite being designed to be as lethal as possible and the ability to be taken pretty much anywhere, cars are still much more dangerous.

By all means, feel free to submit more examples of how amazingly less dangerous guns are compared to things like cars.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

If cars killing more people than guns doesn't concern you, then don't pretend the issue is about people losing their lives.

^^Who let this simpleton/ retard in here?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Dude, seriously you are too stupid to be in this conversation. Select fire means full auto or semi-auto. Burst fire is full auto limited to a specific amount of rounds with a single trigger pull.

The only consistency is your obvious stupidity.

LOL, No Select fire means "select fire". What the selections are is dependant upon the weapon.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with definitions? Maybe go get a dictionary or use google or something......you should have just walked away when you could have.

But you seem to enjoy "playing the fool". So carry on!!

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The probability (in America) of getting murdered by a gun is almost half the probability of getting killed by a vehicle.

Let me put that another way: you are almost twice as likely to get killed by something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible, when compared to something designed to be as lethal as possible.

Let me say that again: guns, despite being designed to be as lethal as possible, cannot match the fatality rate of cars, which are designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

In other words, something that is designed to kill can't match the killing rate of something designed to be as safe and non lethal as possible.

If you are worried about getting murdered by a gun, but don't worry about getting killed by a vehicle, you're delusional and don't understand statistical probability.

Most people don't. That's why lotteries make a fortune.

*chuckles*

Who let the low brow sea lion in????

Automobiles are not more dangerous than firearms. That's laughable to the ninth degree. (and thanks for the laugh, it's my reason to visit the PB anyhow)

While yes there are more deaths due to automobile accidents (currently) than firearm related deaths. There is a a good mathematical reason for this. You like to spout statistics, perhaps you can explain the mathematical logic behind the statistics you like use?

I'll wait for your answer.........(nah, not really, you'll just spout something incorrect, then I'll have to give you the answer, I've seen this movie many times before).

 

[Fuzzy1975]

^^Who let this simpleton/ retard in here?

I've read it claims to be from Alberta....maybe one of those "Bountiful" people got lost.

 

[TastySuckToy]

Automobiles are not more dangerous than firearms.

While yes there are more deaths due to automobile accidents (currently) than firearm related deaths.

"Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."

 

[Fuzzy1975]

"Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."

So you can't answer the question.....no surprise there....

Play again?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

"Something that kills more people than something else doesn't mean it's more dangerous."

Anyone who can own a vehicle (or multiple vehicles) can and should equally have access to guns. Vehicles kill far more people every year than guns do, despite vehicles being designed to be as non lethal and non dangerous as possible.

*chuckles*

Who let the low brow sea lion in????

Automobiles are not more dangerous than firearms. That's laughable to the ninth degree. (and thanks for the laugh, it's my reason to visit the PB anyhow)

Fish in the barrel it really shouldn't be that easy.

 

[TastySuckToy]

Additonal fun fact: 2021 estimates say there is over 100 million more guns in the United States than vehicles (284 million vehicles compared to 393 million guns). So even though there is well over a 100 million more guns in the country than vehicles, vehicles still hands down beat guns at killing people.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Additonal fun fact: 2021 estimates say there is over 100 million more guns in the United States than vehicles (284 million vehicles compared to 393 million guns). So even though there is well over a 100 million more guns in the country than vehicles, vehicles still hands down beat guns at killing people.

This still doesn't explain the statistics.......but feel free to try again....

Automobile related deaths 2022 = 46,000
Firearm related deaths in 2022= 44,000

You're not getting any better at this.....BTW

 

[Philthy_Phil]

I've read it claims to be from Alberta....maybe one of those "Bountiful" people got lost.

He is a complete idiot. He is a self hating homo.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/“straight”-men-who-enjoy-the-occasional-“gay”-tryst.1547362/page-4#post-94886922:~:text=I identify as completely straight, absolutely zero attraction to men. But I've still enjoyed anonymous BJs and do get turned on by how much they enjoy my cock and cum.

I identify as completely straight, absolutely zero attraction to men. But I've still enjoyed anonymous BJs and do get turned on by how much they enjoy my cock and cum.

 

[LeeKee]

Society has come to terms with the fact that some people are determined to destroy their lives with alcohol. They tried regulating it out of existence and failed (remember prohibition?) Self-destruction doesn't generally take others with them. unless they have access to a car or a steel penis substitute.

How many of the last 75 or so school shooters were drunk? I cannot recall a single case. But hai, if this is the best deflection you've got, well, use what you have.

Not my point. Point is most people can in fact regulate themselves, with booze, gambling and yes firearms. You stated that 2A advocates should be on the receiving end of a weapon and were expendable. Listen to that language and tell what exactly makes you judge and executioner? Same shot that goes through the sickos mind. Hence my comment you self identified. Thanks. 25 years as an armed professional doesn’t take lectures and judgement from people spewing language like that.

 

[TrailerHitch]

LOL, No Select fire means "select fire". What the selections are is dependant upon the weapon.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with definitions? Maybe go get a dictionary or use google or something......you should have just walked away when you could have.

But you seem to enjoy "playing the fool". So carry on!!

Dude, you shouldn't talk about things you have to use an internet definition to define. Its obvious you have no personal experience or knowledge of this topic.

Its fun to watch the uninformed try to play superior.

 

[Bray123]

Something, something 'Beat your swords into plowshares.'

But he never said anything about assault rifles, so carry on with your school shootings.