Why are General Board people so stupid?

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Then nothing else you posted after that means a God damned thing, altwife McGunface.

WRONG, Altwife McGunface.

Bronzeage said women don't care about men's height. That is an absolute statement. One counter example dispels him. I pointed out five. I also pointed out articles that showed he was wrong on a societal scale level.

Your reading problems are fucked up as usual.

If you said Black people love watermelon and fried chicken or that Asian people eat cats and dogs, the process of knocking your argument dead out of the sky would consist of providing one example to the contrary.

If you'd even attended one debate class in college you'd have a book in front of you that showed that to you.

You're a fucking idiot, AltWife McGunface. And you just made yourself look like an even bigger idiot by trying to go against me.

Still making the unfounded accusations of alt-hood for my wife, or is it me that's the alt this week? Do you even have any new material? I mean I know the writer's strike is hell but damn, are you going to just recycle the same tired old bullshit for the foreseeable future?

I'll take "Lack of originality and tired old bullshit for $1000 Alex!"

You have intimated (I'll wait while you look that up), repeatedly, that women prefer taller men, which is true for some women, just as some women prefer Brains over Brawn, some prefer the Big and Stupid type. When faced with opposition to your assertion you have fallen back on your usual methods of denial, attributing absolute positions to others, and hurling unfounded accusations to try to discredit those who have shown you to be in error.

Just as any statement I may make regarding the eating habits of Blacks or Asians would be proved false by a single example, IF I had said ALL Blacks and Asians, which I did not. Your statements regarding women's preference for tall men are based on the opinions of those women asked, nothing more. Just as the examples I could provide as to the aforementioned eating habits would be only the opinions of those questioned and nothing more. You cite studies and the personal preference of a few posters on the GB which you have already declared "not representative of reality".

I could present similar studies stating that Black people overwhelmingly prefer fried chicken and watermelon over other foods. That would not make the statement indisputable fact any more than your citations prove that women prefer one type of male partner over another.

You haven't presented fact one. You've presented loads of opinion and labeled them as fact. This is an ongoing issue with a majority of your posts. You can't tell the difference between fact and opinion, dismiss any opposition to your preconceptions and dance around as if you've won something.

It would be funny, if it weren't a sad testament to your particular mental illness.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Still making the unfounded accusations of alt-hood for my wife, or is it me that's the alt this week? Do you even have any new material? I mean I know the writer's strike is hell but damn, are you going to just recycle the same tired old bullshit for the foreseeable future?

I'll take "Lack of originality and tired old bullshit for $1000 Alex!"

You have intimated (I'll wait while you look that up), repeatedly, that women prefer taller men, which is true for some women, just as some women prefer Brains over Brawn, some prefer the Big and Stupid type. When faced with opposition to your assertion you have fallen back on your usual methods of denial, attributing absolute positions to others, and hurling unfounded accusations to try to discredit those who have shown you to be in error.

Bronzeage claimed that women don't care about a man's height.

I showed examples of posts from women that said they do care.

He said they don't. They said they do.

You're a fucking idiot.

Just as any statement I may make regarding the eating habits of Blacks or Asians would be proved false by a single example, IF I had said ALL Blacks and Asians, which I did not. Your statements regarding women's preference for tall men are based on the opinions of those women asked, nothing more. Just as the examples I could provide as to the aforementioned eating habits would be only the opinions of those questioned and nothing more. You cite studies and the personal preference of a few posters on the GB which you have already declared "not representative of reality".

I could present similar studies stating that Black people overwhelmingly prefer fried chicken and watermelon over other foods. That would not make the statement indisputable fact any more than your citations prove that women prefer one type of male partner over another.

Your argument is totally off the mark.

Bronzeage said women do not care about a man's height.

I provided posts by women who said they do care about a man's height.

"women do not care about a man's height" is proven wrong when you present examples of women saying they do care about a man's height.

You haven't presented fact one.

Yes I have presented solid facts.

The only way you can say that's not a fact is if you say right here, right now, that there were no posts by women who said they care about a man's height.

Are you willing to be a total fool and assert that there were no posts by women who said they care about a man's height? No? Then you're a fucking idiot for claiming I didn't present any facts.

Now shut the fuck up, AltWife McGunface.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Really, UD, shut the fuck up.

You've lost this fight.

You don't even know what the definition of a fact is.

Let's recap what 'fact' means.

Fact: n, A piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred

For example:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24481749&postcount=49

I'm 5'10.
I tower over people your height. I'm also fat. Which means that I would look like a mountain next to you.
That being said, part of it is complete vanity- I don't like being bigger than my partner.
The other thing, is that I like to be able to snuggle in my man's arms, and feel like he can protect me.
The last guy I dated who was your height, I ended up throwing across a room once, because he wouldn't stop tickling me. I didn't quite MEAN to throw him across the room, but it wasn't difficult- I'm strong, he was small.
*shrug*
My honey's 6'5.

is a piece of information (a link to a post) about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred (the event being a woman who has said she cares about a man's height)

which is a direct contradiction to:
"women don't care about a man's height".

Now, by all means, show us all which part of the above is incorrect.

Of course you can't.


And your understanding of the word 'opinion' is fucked to hell, too.

This is not an opinion:

"That being said, part of it is complete vanity- I don't like being bigger than my partner.
The other thing, is that I like to be able to snuggle in my man's arms, and feel like he can protect me. "

This is what is called, in the dictionary, a preference.

Before you come back at me, Ulaven Demented, first stop and learn the difference between an opinion and a preference.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I haven't lost anything LT, except perhaps a little of my time in responding to your idiocy.

You've been harping on this "Women don't like short men" thing for quite awhile. Congratulations on finding a few GB posters that support that point of view, it's a shame really that you only value the opinions of posters on the GB when they support your assertions, and dismiss them entirely when they do not as "not representative of reality" (your description). You cited several posts by women who supported your idea, and ignored those that did not. I suppose those who disagreed and didn't prefer tall men over shorter ones are "not representative of reality" right? At least until they support your next umbrage of the month and become instantly credible in your eyes..



Instead of addressing the very obvious problem of both claiming that posters on the GB are "not representative of reality" when they disagree with you and how they magically become credible and issue statements of "irrefutable fact" when they do agree with you..

You have chosen, a repeated tactic of yours, to assign a position to those that disagree with you via Informal Fallacy, Appeal to Ridicule (I'll wait for you to look those up... done?) and Ad Hominem (A favorite of yours). Your "debate" tactics remind me of a joke from Ron White:

"I was kicked off the debate team in high school for saying "Yeah? Well FUCK YOU!" and thinking I had won."

When all else fails, and it usually does, resort to absurd accusations: "You have an imaginary spouse!", personal attacks: "You're not a man!", and attempts at intimidation: "I once traveled across state lines to kick someone's ass!" .

Pity you aren't intimidating in the least.. Well, maybe to small Latino kids, possibly women, if they're shorter than you..

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I haven't lost anything LT, except perhaps a little of my time in responding to your idiocy.

You've been harping on this "Women don't like short men" thing for quite awhile. Congratulations on finding a few GB posters that support that point of view, it's a shame really that you only value the opinions of posters on the GB when they support your assertions, and dismiss them entirely when they do not as "not representative of reality" (your description).

I didn't need ANY GB posters to support that point of view. I posted an ABC News study that showed the same thing:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=230011&page=1

Of course, you and Bronzeage assert vehemently that you have more credibility than they do. That's part of your delusion problem.

You cited several posts by women who supported your idea, and ignored those that did not.

Because it only takes one post by a woman who "supported my idea" to prove Bronzeage was wrong.

I suppose those who disagreed and didn't prefer tall men over shorter ones are "not representative of reality" right? At least until they support your next umbrage of the month and become instantly credible in your eyes..

Of course they do. There are always exceptions. People like VermillionSkye can almost always be counted on to be an exception in the superior sense.

Instead of addressing the very obvious problem of both claiming that posters on the GB are "not representative of reality" when they disagree with you and how they magically become credible and issue statements of "irrefutable fact" when they do agree with you..

It's only a problem in your universe.

Like I said, I didn't need any examples from the GB at all. I had the credibility of the ABC News study on the issue.

You have chosen, a repeated tactic of yours, to assign a position to those that disagree with you via Informal Fallacy, Appeal to Ridicule (I'll wait for you to look those up... done?) and Ad Hominem (A favorite of yours). Your "debate" tactics remind me of a joke from Ron White:

"I was kicked off the debate team in high school for saying "Yeah? Well FUCK YOU!" and thinking I had won."

Oh lord, that's enough of dealing with your idiocy and delusions for now, Altwife McGunface.

You can get up and run around the room with your intimidating imaginary guns and mutter about perforating your ass with imaginary bullets now.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I didn't need ANY GB posters to support that point of view. I posted an ABC News study that showed the same thing:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=230011&page=1

Of course, you and Bronzeage assert vehemently that you have more credibility than they do. That's part of your delusion problem.

Because it only takes one post by a woman who "supported my idea" to prove Bronzeage was wrong.

Of course they do. There are always exceptions. People like VermillionSkye can almost always be counted on to be an exception in the superior sense.

It's only a problem in your universe.

Like I said, I didn't need any examples from the GB at all. I had the credibility of the ABC News study on the issue.


Oh lord, that's enough of dealing with your idiocy and delusions for now, Altwife McGunface.

You can get up and run around the room with your intimidating imaginary guns and mutter about perforating your ass with imaginary bullets now.

Oh good lord, an ABC News story, from 20/20.

Well, why didn't you tell us that you had such overwhelming scientific evidence? A 2004 20/20 story citing a "study" they did 10 years previously? They asked the opinions of women (no numbers mentioned) on a select group of men. Was it 10 women? 100? 1000?

Some of the other gems from that "study".

*Blondes do have more fun. (Based on the opinion of two actors, each sent out as both Blonde and Brunette, at least they admit that it's a "very unscientific test")

*Sex education does not lead to more teens having sex. (No shit!? Don't try to claim this as any sort of scientific finding in front of an "abstinence only" crowd)

*The "Seven Year Itch" doesn't exist. (It's actually a Four year Itch, damn we're an impatient bunch)

*Women cheat (almost) as much as men. (Based on the caseload of a single Private Investigator and the opinion of a biologist citing the mating habits of birds... Warblers to be exact)

*It's safe to have sex during pregnancy. (No shit!?)

*Size does matter. (based on the statements of a sex therapist and the same biologist that compared human mating habits to birds)

*Married people have a better sex life than singles. (An actual university study, the first mentioned)

*Women do indeed like porn. (Again, No shit!?)

*Herbal sex enhancers work (maybe). (based on the statements of a University professor that sells "Hot Plants" and a couple given a trial, anecdotal at best)

Thats some fucking scientific study you're touting there I must say.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is a 13 year old laughable "study" by 20/20 and the personal preferences of several women who belong to a group of people that you have repeatedly claimed were "not representative of reality".

You will seize onto any shred of evidence that reinforces your point, no matter how small, and prance around in your little victory dance.

Fucking hilarious... Brilliant... I really needed a laugh this morning. I'm so glad you reposted your "scientific study".

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Well, when you can come up with a study that counters the ABC News study on women and height, Altwife McGunface, I'll be right here, waiting.

Now who do people listen to most? Them? Or you?

I'll be waiting, Gunface.

Oh good lord, an ABC News story, from 20/20.

Well, why didn't you tell us that you had such overwhelming scientific evidence? A 2004 20/20 story citing a "study" they did 10 years previously? They asked the opinions of women (no numbers mentioned) on a select group of men. Was it 10 women? 100? 1000?

Some of the other gems from that "study".

*Blondes do have more fun. (Based on the opinion of two actors, each sent out as both Blonde and Brunette, at least they admit that it's a "very unscientific test")

*Sex education does not lead to more teens having sex. (No shit!? Don't try to claim this as any sort of scientific finding in front of an "abstinence only" crowd)

*The "Seven Year Itch" doesn't exist. (It's actually a Four year Itch, damn we're an impatient bunch)

*Women cheat (almost) as much as men. (Based on the caseload of a single Private Investigator and the opinion of a biologist citing the mating habits of birds... Warblers to be exact)

*It's safe to have sex during pregnancy. (No shit!?)

*Size does matter. (based on the statements of a sex therapist and the same biologist that compared human mating habits to birds)

*Married people have a better sex life than singles. (An actual university study, the first mentioned)

*Women do indeed like porn. (Again, No shit!?)

*Herbal sex enhancers work (maybe). (based on the statements of a University professor that sells "Hot Plants" and a couple given a trial, anecdotal at best)

Thats some fucking scientific study you're touting there I must say.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is a 13 year old laughable "study" by 20/20 and the personal preferences of several women who belong to a group of people that you have repeatedly claimed were "not representative of reality".

You will seize onto any shred of evidence that reinforces your point, no matter how small, and prance around in your little victory dance.

Fucking hilarious... Brilliant... I really needed a laugh this morning. I'm so glad you reposted your "scientific study".

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Well, when you can come up with a study that counters the ABC News study on women and height, Altwife McGunface, I'll be right here, waiting.

Now who do people listen to most? Them? Or you?

I'll be waiting, Gunface.

That wasn't a study moron, it was a fluff piece that you're trying to pass off as scientific proof. I don't need to show an actual study refuting it's claims, 20/20 did a fairly good job of stating that it is in no way a scientific study several times.

Next you'll be using quizzes from Cosmopolitan to give sex advice.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

That wasn't a study moron, it was a fluff piece that you're trying to pass off as scientific proof. I don't need to show an actual study refuting it's claims, 20/20 did a fairly good job of stating that it is in no way a scientific study several times.

Next you'll be using quizzes from Cosmopolitan to give sex advice.

You've got to be bullshitting me. You actually believe that tripe you just wrote?

 

[Le Jacquelope]

BlackShanglan continues to blame others for his inability to present a coherent argument, or even reason his way out of a paper bag:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=25005587&postcount=133

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Ham Murabi talks about himself in the third person:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=554913

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Encyclopedia Dollpartica...

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=555438

 

[Le Jacquelope]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=25041872&postcount=181

Ulaven Demorte says that accusing the Government of treason and mass murder of American citizens is tantamount to Anti-American speech.

He's utterly getting trampled in that thread.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=25041872&postcount=181

Ulaven Demorte says that accusing the Government of treason and mass murder of American citizens is tantamount to Anti-American speech.

He's utterly getting trampled in that thread.

Ah another example of your taking a single post out of context and dancing around it in triumph.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Ah another example of your taking a single post out of context and dancing around it in triumph.

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb218/theltothet/excusesfordummies-ulaven.jpg

 

[Le Jacquelope]

If you call someone out over racism, you're playing the race card:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=555979

 

[Le Jacquelope]

A bunch of idiots ranting about how women are the lesser gender:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=25220586

 

[Guest]

i think i'm stupid for just posting on here but that's just my opinion

 

[Le Jacquelope]

i think i'm stupid for just posting on here but that's just my opinion

When you're feeling down, just come here and read the people I point out (or whom I lure here, lol) and rejoice that life could be worse...

after all, you could have been one of them!

 

[Guest]

When you're feeling down, just come here and read the people I point out (or whom I lure here, lol) and rejoice that life could be worse...

after all, you could have been one of them!

i'm not sure i can agree but you are allowed to have your opinions

 

[Le Jacquelope]

You gotta love how angry stupid people get when you point out some white person's racial slurs and their "husband"'s death threats:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=559034

I'm just hoping this is just a case of Hornybabe and Peregrinator not realizing the human turds that they're defending...

 

[Byron In Exile]

I'm just hoping this is just a case of Hornybabe and Peregrinator not realizing the human turds that they're defending...

Maybe they won't kiss your ass.

How terrible would that be?

 

[Byron In Exile]

i think i'm stupid for just posting on here but that's just my opinion

It's no reflection on your intelligence that you could be taken in by Lovingtongue.

His loving tongue is brown.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Uh oh, Byron's off his meds again. It's time to close the shopping malls.

 

[mrtnmoon]

because water is wet and the sky is blue and no blacks ar racist at all.