Where's the Equivalent Concern?

[Conager]

Oh look. Conager, a man who bragged about not having health insurance on his kids for 10 years...and who had a spotty child support payment record once his wife left him for a responsible breadwinner....is lecturing others on their "lack of a moral center".

Points and laughs. You actually think posts like this demonstrate good character?

Your obsessive-compulsive archive needs indexing and summaries attached. Your links show quite the opposite of what you claim.

What is it with you and your compulsive need to lie about other people?.... Is it simple envy or is it just your well-founded, low self-esteem?

All it takes is a week of ignoring your Skiddles attack-puppet ti get you to "man" up and use your RDS login.

 

[bestone4ever]

It's not factual it's opinionated.

Math isn't "opinionated", retard.

 

[FlowersForFun]

So Obama issued the fewest executive orders/year of any president since the 19th Century.

Yup.

If all you knew of the world came from reading the GB, you'd be very surprised to learn that.

I think one takes a truly objective view they would see a bunch of partisans who hate Hate HATE it when the other team has the authority to decide what to enforce and what to let slide as low priority.
It's always wonderful when THEIR president does it, but when the OTHER team gets a go? Total derangement derp.


Kenyan STALIN is sending commie ninja death panels to get grandma in the middle of the night!!

Orange HITLER has his own personal Auschwitz on the Mexican border where he bathes in the blood of undocumented citizenz!!!

 

[FlowersForFun]

Math isn't "opinionated", retard.

Never said it was, learn to read, retard.

 

[bestone4ever]

Never said it was, learn to read, retard.

How are you this dumb? Your failed attempt to troll me blew up in your face

 

[HisArpy]

I assumed they were not really arguing the overall merits, just the immediacy of the relief requested.

It looks like dissent addressed the merits and denial ignored the disparate treatment, made gratuitous assertions about the asymptomatic carrier boogeyman and denied because they felt it not exigent.

So apparantly, the Bill of Rights does not apply so long as you declare an emergency and suspend rights "just in case" it helps and can do so over an indefinite period of time.

The State of California has had plenty of time to engage in actual scientific study to demonstrate their exigent circumstances for infringing on the free exercise of religion and they were not required to meet that burden. Why does the burden shift to the oppressed?

John Robert's is an embarrassment. He's so worried that history will call him a partisan it he simply joins with what should be.majority position that, in a knee jerk reaction, joins the actual partisans that can contort any set of facts to their benefit

I've said for years that Roberts needs to be impeached and removed. He's too soft and way too small in character for the shoes he's got to fill.

 

[Conager]

So Obama issued the fewest executive orders/year of any president since the 19th Century. If all you knew of the world came from reading the GB, you'd be very surprised to learn that.

The *number* of EOs is not a useful metric.

It isn't just a concern that executive orders are being issued, some orders are very defensible, and demonstrably beneficial in non controversial ways. At issue is the what action individual executive orders have and whether a particular order overstepped constitutional constraints on executive power or usurped congressional authority.

That problem is not a one-way proposition. Contrary to constitutional intent most "law" and regulatory authority is enacted by fiat through the executive branch. Sometimes Presidents just seized the authority over Congress' mild, minority objections, but more often than not by Congress abdicating their responsibility to flesh out legislation and conflict oversight.

I'm not aware of any president other than Obama saying the quiet part out loud that I'm going to use my pen and my phone's to specifically conch ravine Congress is authorization permission and intent. I'm going to ask you serve their authority because I can. He got slapped down by the Supreme Court for DACA and he should have been rejected on DACA. His unlawful orders on the ACA should have been struck down.

Trump's latest adventuring is likely not constitutional will definitely be challenged in court if he bothers to follow through on it and should be struck down.

I am not sure why he does not enjoy immunity from criticism for his historic achievement as the first reality TV star and producer to be elected POTUS.

 

[Conager]

I've said for years that Roberts needs to be impeached and removed. He's too soft and way too small in character for the shoes he's got to fill.

Never happen, but fun to think about

An honest liberal with respect for plain-language might be better. It's tough to think about the law from a perspective of fidelity to appropriate principles theater than getting rulings that break in ways that favor policies you like.

I like Heller. I'm unconvinced it is correct. I would prefer a parallel universe where a liberal court ruled the other way, and did so by threading the needle by constraining the 14th. I do not believe the 14th was intended to incorporate any other amendment than itself. I think Col. Hogan convincingly refuted my position, but I still think the states should be able to decide on a lot of matters.

Stiff like that.

I don't like Marberry, but as the good colonel patiently explained to me, it had to happen in 5hat or some similar fashion or SCOTUS would be feckless. I'd like it less toothy. Just thumbs up, or "sorry, boys re-write that one, it cant fly as is." No, "this is what it *should* say.

I think none of that would be a problem if we understood and impeached Senatirs, Representatives, circuit and appeals court judges, SCOTUS justices and the odd POTUS here and there.

 

[Conager]

Yup.



I think one takes a truly objective view they would see a bunch of partisans who hate Hate HATE it when the other team has the authority to decide what to enforce and what to let slide as low priority.
It's always wonderful when THEIR president does it, but when the OTHER team gets a go? Total derangement derp.


Kenyan STALIN is sending commie ninja death panels to get grandma in the middle of the night!!

Orange HITLER has his own personal Auschwitz on the Mexican border where he bathes in the blood of undocumented citizenz!!!

As I pointed out above, although there's a lot of what about isn't to go around there's even more false equivalencies on that issue.

Trump's going to have to get his Mussolini on if he's ever going to best Obama's DACA EO. It's truly a standing though that one president can use his pain in phone to an act a clearly unconstitutional EO which cannot be undone by the next president in a constitutional matter with the same pain in phone.

We really do need one set of rules whether that happens to benefit my guy the way I like it or not.

 

[RobDownSouth]

<Botany Mode>
Obama issued the fewest executive orders per year because of limitiations imposed by the founding fathers.
Our founding fathers (praise be unto them) correctly defined a non-white person of having 3/5 (60%) of the rights of white people.
It therefore stands to reason that a non-white president be limited to issuing 60% of the number of executive orders of his white predecessors.
Now, some may claim that by dint of being born of a white mother he should be allowed full white privilege. That doesn't take away from the fact that he had a Kenyan father and was, in fact, born in Kenya. So even accounting for his white mother, he is still, at best, limited to 80% of the number of executive orders.
Do the math!
Checkmate, libtards!
Show me where I lied!
</Botany Mode>

 

[FlowersForFun]

<Botany Mode>
Obama issued the fewest executive orders per year because of limitiations imposed by the founding fathers.
Our founding fathers (praise be unto them) correctly defined a non-white person of having 3/5 (60%) of the rights of white people.
It therefore stands to reason that a non-white president be limited to issuing 60% of the number of executive orders of his white predecessors.
Now, some may claim that by dint of being born of a white mother he should be allowed full white privilege. That doesn't take away from the fact that he had a Kenyan father and was, in fact, born in Kenya. So even accounting for his white mother, he is still, at best, limited to 80% of the number of executive orders.
Do the math!
Checkmate, libtards!
Show me where I lied!
</Botany Mode>

Look at all that ascription.

Rob has to resort to such radical dishonesty because he can't argue his positions or politics on their merit.

 

[FlowersForFun]

We really do need one set of rules whether that happens to benefit my guy the way I like it or not.

We're never getting rid of leftist (D)'z.

They are the party of Regulations for thee....but not for mee!!!