Trumpers are flying the black flag

You won't find any psychologist who believes there are hereditary psychological differences, in intelligence or "monogamy" or any other characteristic, between "racial" groups or any other kind of population groups.

Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective is a book by Canadian psychologist and author J. Philippe Rushton. Rushton was a professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario for many years, and the head of the controversial Pioneer Fund. The first unabridged edition of the book came out in 1995, and the third, latest unabridged edition came out in 2000; abridged versions were also distributed.

Rushton argues that race is a valid biological concept and that racial differences frequently arrange in a continuum across 60 different behavioral and anatomical variables, with Mongoloids (East Asians) at one end of the continuum, Negroids (Sub-Saharan Black Africans) at the opposite extreme, and Caucasoids (Europeans) in the middle.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior

---------

IQ and the Wealth of Nations is a 2002 book by psychologist Richard Lynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen.[1] The authors argue that differences in national income (in the form of per capita gross domestic product) are correlated with differences in the average national intelligence quotient (IQ). They further argue that differences in average national IQs constitute one important factor, but not the only one, contributing to differences in national wealth and rates of economic growth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations

---------

Richard Julius Herrnstein (May 20, 1930 – September 13, 1994) was an American psychologist at Harvard University. He was an active researcher in animal learning in the Skinnerian tradition. Herrnstein was the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology until his death, and previously chaired the Harvard Department of Psychology for five years. With political scientist Charles Murray, he co-wrote The Bell Curve, a controversial 1994 book on human intelligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Herrnstein

---------

Arthur Robert Jensen (August 24, 1923 – October 22, 2012) was an American psychologist and writer. He was a professor of educational psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.[1][2] Jensen was known for his work in psychometrics and differential psychology, the study of how and why individuals differ behaviorally from one another.

He was a major proponent of the hereditarian position in the nature and nurture debate, the position that genetics play a significant role in behavioral traits, such as intelligence and personality. He was the author of over 400 scientific papers published in refereed journals[3] and sat on the editorial boards of the scientific journals Intelligence and Personality and Individual Differences.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen
 
I'm familiar with Rushton and Jensen -- the scientific community dismisses them as cranks.
 
I'm familiar with Rushton and Jensen -- the scientific community dismisses them as cranks.

Scientific truth is not determined by consensus, but by facts.

In his 1969 Harvard Educational Review article, "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Achievement?" Professor Jensen argued that little can be done to boost IQ and achievement. Subsequent events have proved him right. Little has been achieved despite expensive efforts like Head Start and No Child Left Behind.

Similarly, Professor Rushton has documented facts obvious to law enforcement and to teachers in multi racial public schools.
 
Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective is a book by Canadian psychologist and author J. Philippe Rushton. Rushton

If you are going to try and deflect from your obvious racism, please use a person who was not labelled a racist,decades ago....

As a human being he was a piece of shit, and I as a Canadian, wish there would have been a way to ship him the fuck out and strip him of citizenship....but in the end he is dead!

Which leaves only his idiot followers like you, but someday, you too shall follow him down that last worldly path, and there will be one less racist treading on planet Earth.
 
Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective is a book by Canadian psychologist and author J. Philippe Rushton. Rushton was a professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario for many years, and the head of the controversial Pioneer Fund. The first unabridged edition of the book came out in 1995, and the third, latest unabridged edition came out in 2000; abridged versions were also distributed.

Rushton argues that race is a valid biological concept and that racial differences frequently arrange in a continuum across 60 different behavioral and anatomical variables, with Mongoloids (East Asians) at one end of the continuum, Negroids (Sub-Saharan Black Africans) at the opposite extreme, and Caucasoids (Europeans) in the middle.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior

---------

IQ and the Wealth of Nations is a 2002 book by psychologist Richard Lynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen.[1] The authors argue that differences in national income (in the form of per capita gross domestic product) are correlated with differences in the average national intelligence quotient (IQ). They further argue that differences in average national IQs constitute one important factor, but not the only one, contributing to differences in national wealth and rates of economic growth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations

---------

Richard Julius Herrnstein (May 20, 1930 – September 13, 1994) was an American psychologist at Harvard University. He was an active researcher in animal learning in the Skinnerian tradition. Herrnstein was the Edgar Pierce Professor of Psychology until his death, and previously chaired the Harvard Department of Psychology for five years. With political scientist Charles Murray, he co-wrote The Bell Curve, a controversial 1994 book on human intelligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Herrnstein

---------

Arthur Robert Jensen (August 24, 1923 – October 22, 2012) was an American psychologist and writer. He was a professor of educational psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.[1][2] Jensen was known for his work in psychometrics and differential psychology, the study of how and why individuals differ behaviorally from one another.

He was a major proponent of the hereditarian position in the nature and nurture debate, the position that genetics play a significant role in behavioral traits, such as intelligence and personality. He was the author of over 400 scientific papers published in refereed journals[3] and sat on the editorial boards of the scientific journals Intelligence and Personality and Individual Differences.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen

by even using the term 'negroid' you just blew any argument you had to shit.

btw, the laundry called. your white hood and sheet are ready.
 
I'm familiar with Rushton and Jensen -- the scientific community dismisses them as cranks.

The 'scientific community' can't tell the difference between a man and a woman and absent any actual science (clinical trials) they told us that the mRNA shot for COVID 19 was "100% safe and effective" when in fact it was neither.
 
Regarding the title of this topic:

"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."​


- HL Mencken
 
by even using the term 'negroid' you just blew any argument you had to shit.

btw, the laundry called. your white hood and sheet are ready.

Despite your tender feelings the word negroid still applies to people who exhibit Negro characteristics. Granted there are bigots who use the word but all the same it is still a legitimate word with legitimate definitions and neutral applications.

By the by, Ethiopians and Somalis are typically considered Caucasoid.

The color of their skin having no bearing on their haplogroup origins.
 
The 'scientific community' can't tell the difference between a man and a woman and absent any actual science (clinical trials) they told us that the mRNA shot for COVID 19 was "100% safe and effective" when in fact it was neither.

🙄

EVERY bit of that ^ is LIES / GASLIGHTING / BULLSHIT

👎

Search assist

Yes, the scientific community recognizes differences between men and women based on biological, physiological, and neurological factors, although there is significant overlap between the sexes. Research has shown that these differences can affect various aspects of health, behavior, and cognitive abilities.

Search assist

Yes, COVID-19 vaccines underwent extensive clinical trials to establish their safety and efficacy before being authorized for public use. These trials typically included multiple phases, involving thousands of participants to ensure thorough testing.

Search Assist

COVID vaccine manufacturers did not claim their vaccines were 100% safe and effective; rather, they provided data showing high efficacy rates, such as 91.3% for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and emphasized ongoing monitoring for safety. Claims of 100% effectiveness are often misinterpretations of initial trial results and do not reflect real-world effectiveness.

😑

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Last edited:
Back
Top