What would you do?

April

Apriltini
Joined
Jun 8, 2000
Posts
14,446
If someone you had an intimate encounter with in the past said they were passing through town and wanted to *ahem* well, you know. :eek: Just for a couple of hours of your time. You didn't have to stay the night with them, and they would be leaving town the next morning.

Would you do it? Why or why not? Would you be insulted that the subject was even brought up?
 
were they good?
did you like them?

if the answer is yes to either of these questions, then yes, i would. of course i'm a bad example. i'd do it if the answers were no. i'm a big slut.
 
If I was unattached and I knew that there would be no emotional consequences for either of us I think I would do it. So long as they did not leave money on the dresser for me I think I could handle it. I do think that there are not many encounters like that in which the emotional consequences are not a factor.
 
As I am attached, I would decline, but I would invite them to dinner with the family.
 
I don't believe it would be a money on the dresser kind of situation. More like a "I really lust after you, missed you, I think you're great, let's fuck" kind of situation.

Well, this is what too much time and booze does to my brain. ;)
 
Depends on your present relationship status. Single? Well... then consider it based on a few of the other suggestions. I'd say that if you're in any sort of serious relationship, tho.. mmm. :( No.
 
I'm in a relationship so I'd say no.








But a few years ago.........:D
 
TO me it seems like most "no strings attached" flings have the most heartache, because you go in knowing that there will be nothing and wont be hurt. So if you get any emotional ties even if it is two hours or so (ie. memories, the feeling of the person) they are harder to let go in my expearenced opinion. I mean it sounds really contradictive, but that is what i have found.

though to each their own, i mean if you feel ok with it go ahead.
 
oh for crying out loud!!

there's always strings attached! (and if you're lucky some manacles) so what. what's sex without a little apprehension. one more thing that helps to keep it dirty. and i'll tell ya something else. why does it have to be healthy every time.? i mean, who's really a truestraight edge? people smoke, drink, drug, gamble, etc. for shrissakes, screw screw screw. emotional attachments be damned. let the chips fall where they may.
 
If I was unattached and they were good, hell yeah I would do it.
Why not?
 
hmm.. I have done this in the past, but I don't think I would do it now. The thought alone makes me feel a little queasy. I think I've moved to a phase in my life where I just want a life partner - and that does not include casual sex.
 
April said:
If someone you had an intimate encounter with in the
past said they were passing through town and wanted
to *ahem* well, you know. :eek: Just for a couple of hours
of your time. You didn't have to stay the night with
them, and they would be leaving town the next morning.
Would you do it? Why or why not? Would you be insulted
that the subject was even brought up?

I think it would depend on the person.......and if I have
the desire to go thru with it.........a couple of hours is
nothing.......I need several hours for close, intimate
pleasures......but a couple hours is better than nothing.....


tigerjen
 
Back
Top