What do these terms mean?

WOW! What a list!

But DAMN Nero-1! You could have broken that up into about 5 posts! You shot your wad in one post! :eek:
 
TELL me about it!

So many naughty terms...how will I ever memorize them all? :D
 
Nero-1 said:
Dictionary of Obscure Sexual Terms

Angry Dragon......dead.


im not sure but I do believe that all this is copywrited material from urban dictionary.com.....i would check.....by the way i can be quite kinky but someof this is just sick.....funny as hell though....
 
Back to the word "cunk…"

I think we should make it the name of female discharge.

For example:

After the orgy, the sheets in the motel room were crusted with a disgusting amount of cunk and santorum. Not only did the maids demand a raise after cleaning the room, the sheets were not laundered, but burned instead.
 
I think I posted this before (maybe in this forum) but it's one of my favorites:

Danza Slap (n.) When, after oral sex, a man pulls his penis out of the woman's face, and proceeds to smack it across the woman's cheeks. Used primarily as a finishing move.

Not to be confused with turkeyslapping, which is just a smack in the face with a penis, not necessarily to a woman who is giving oral sex, or even someone who wants to be near the penis.

Originates from Tony Danza's pre-Who's the Boss career as a porn star. This was his signature move.
 
He wasn't really a porn "star," he had a brief career in porn as did Sylvester Stallone and more than a few other Hollywood actors.

Personally, I have my doubts about the phrase itself ... it seems more like an urban legend to me. Makes for wonderful bar conversation, though.
 
A Dirty Sanchez is, in fact, using a soiled finger or penis to draw a poop mustache on your partner's upper lip

Remind me why I don't want to have sex with another man. This is too far out and yeech! gross!
 
sorry to dump that all in one post...

I honestly have no idea where I got that stuff from...

If it is copywritten then I will remove it but, as I said I just picked it up somewhere...

Yeah mainly sick disgusting crap but some of it is damn funny..
 
ok, heres one for you all... im trying to find out where the term "speak of the devil' came from? also, is it mainly from a certain area?
thanks in advance!!!
~~5PINTSHEFOUND {L5P wife}
 
This is probably more than you wanted to know, but I have a special fascination with the etymology of phrases.

"Talk of the devil, and he is bound to appear."

(The person who has been talked about secretly is likely to show up unexpectedly.)

The earliest appearances of the proverb in print were in Adagia (1500) by Erasmus (1466-1536) and in Endimio (1591) by John Lyly (about 1554-1606). In 1666, it appeared in G. Torriano's collection of Italian proverbs and in 1721 in James Kelly's collection of Scottish proverbs.

"Speak of the devil" is a shortened variant used when someone being discussed shows up unexpectedly.

(From the Random House Dictionary of Popular Proverbs & Sayings)
----------
The English say, "Talk of the Devil, and he's presently at your elbow." (G. Torriano, Italian Proverbs, 1666)
"Speak of the Dee'l, and he'll appear." Spoken when they, of whom we are speaking, come in by Chance. (J. Kelly, Scottish Proverbs, 1721)
"How free he had made with the Devil's name." ... "Talk of the Devil, and he will appear." (R. Graves, Spiritual Quixote, 1773)
"Speak o' th' devil and behold his horns!" (T. Knight, Turnpike Gate, 1799)
"They are the very men we spoke of -- talk of the devil, and -- humph?" (W. Scott, The Fortunes of Nigel, 1822)
 
I just saw Timeline… it wasn't as bad as those critics claimed it was. Although when it comes to swords and horses it can't hold a candle to The Last Samurai.

But one thing bothered me: Greek Fire. What is it?

(I used to think it was slang for that burning feeling after having your spinchter stretched after anal sex (Greek Style). But… no.)
 
Last edited:
Re: Dumb question?

KindaKinky said:
I hear the word coward used often when concerning terror attacks and other situations. The definition is "one who flees from danger." Since most terrorist cause the danger, why are they considered "cowardly?"

Forgetting the political correctness bull or the tripe coming from the idiot in the white house.

From a military perspective its considered cowardly to attack someone that has no means of defending one's self. Its a hold over from the days when wars where held far from cities and civilians were generally not much affected by the war.

Now for example if they attacked a carrier battle group, which does have the ability to defend against an air attack, I doubt anyone would have called them cowardly. Treacherous perhaps, but not cowardly.
 
KindaKinky said:
I just saw Timeline… it wasn't as bad as those critics claimed it was. Although when it comes to swords and horses it can't hold a candle to The Last Samurai.

But one thing bothered me: Greek Fire. What is it?

(I used to think it was slang for that bruning feeling after having your spinchter stretched after anal sex (Greek Style). But… no.)

Greek Fire was the secret weapon of the Eastern Roman Emperors. It is said to have been invented by a Syrian Engineer, one Callinicus, a refugee from Maalbek, in the seventh century (673 AD). The "liquid fire" was hurled on to the ships of their enemies from siphons and burst into flames on contact. As it was reputed to be inextinguishable and burned even on water, it caused panic and dread. Its introducation into warfare of its time was comparable in its demoralizing influence to the introducation of nuclear weapons in our time. Both Arab and Greek sources agree that it surpassed all incendiary weapons in destruction. The secret behind the Greek fire was handed down from one emperor to the next for centuries. Rumors about its composition include such chemicals as liquid petroleum, naphtha, burning pitch, sulphur, resin, quick lime and bitumen, along with some other "secret ingredient". The exact composition, however, remains unknown. For a thorough investigation of the weapon one can refer to Professor J.R. Partington's book, "A history of the Greek Fire and Gunpowder", Heffer, 1960. This volume quotes the ancient authorities extensively, with an excellent commentary. It also examines ancient and modern theories on the composition of the chemicals used in the Greek Fire. This is considered the most up to date source on the subject.
 
Wow… from your explanation, it seems that Greek fire was the equivalent of the impact of Fat Man and Little Boy.
 
James G 5 said:
A Dirty Sanchez is, in fact, using a soiled finger or penis to draw a poop mustache on your partner's upper lip

Ok, I went digging (so to speak) and found a site called "The Most Popular Anal Sex Positions in the World"
They gave these descriptions:

Dirty Sanchez: A dirty sanchez is when after having anal sex the giver pull us his penis and rubs it on the upper lip of the receiver's face. This supposedly leaves a mustache. Yeah right, I am sure tons of folks are doing this.

Hot Carl: or is it Hot Karl? A hot carl is when one person squats over the other and shits in his or her mouth. I don't know who thinks these things up but I think they must masturbate to some pretty weird stuff.

Well now I am really turned off
 
In my high school days I was a complete and total nerd, and played naval wargames with little miniature ships and a complex rulebook larger than the OED. For the ancient ship battles, Greek Fire was a formidable weapon (at least by the damage dice rolls). Although what I remember generally coincides with Bob's post, I found a little more information in the martitime encyclopedia.....

It was a weapon used by the Byzantine Empire, said to have been invented by a Syrian Christian refugee named Callinicus of Heliopolis. It was capable of discharging a stream of burning fluid, and was very effective both on sea and land, but it was used primarily at sea.

Bronze tubes that emitted jets of liquid fire were mounted on the prows of their galleys and on the walls of Constantinople. The Byzantines in 678 and again in 717–18 destroyed two Saracen fleets with Greek fire.

The secret of manufacturing the fluid was very carefully guarded--so well that today we still do not know how it was made. Various sources speculate that its consituents may have included sulfur, quicklime, and liquid petroleum. These materials were apparently heated in a cauldron, and then pumped out through a siphon.

Enemy ships were often afraid to come too near the Byzantine fleet because once within range the fire gave the Byzantines a strong advantage.

Byzantine fire was largely responsible for many Byzantine military victories, and partly the reason for the Empire surviving as long as it did, particularly near the end of the Empire when there were not enough inhabitants of Byzantium to effectively defend it.

It was first used in 672 against an attacking Arab fleet, and it quickly become one of the most fearsome weapons of the medieval world; the mere sight of any sort of siphon, whether it was used for Greek fire or not, was often enough to defeat an enemy.

However, it was hard to control, and often accidentally set Byzantine ships on fire as well. It was in a general way similar to the modern flamethrower.
 
Last edited:
"Talk of the devil, and he is bound to appear."

A variation on this expression is "Speak of angels, and you'll hear the rustling of their wings."
 
hey all....glad to se my favorite thread is back.......I havent had many outlets for my well of useless information lately.......well it looks like the greek fire question is taken care of farely welll......maybe next time I will bother to log off of my wifes SN and log onto my own.......have a great day....Lost5pints
 
i was cooking dinner the other day and a thought came to me. I was cooking "Turkey ala King" and didn't know exactly what it means. I would guess its french {like a la mode} but im not sure why a la king is used?!?! Any info on this would be greatly appreciated!!!

~5PHF
 
Back
Top