Un-circumsized cocks

[Meat Whistler]

I don't think it matters, really. But, I'm the kind of female that loves cock, regardless of size, color, or cut.

 

[templuhknite]

Cut or uncut it's all cock.
The thing is if you are not circumcised you can experience both (i.e by getting circumcised) but if you were circumcised as a baby - there is no going back . . .

 

[Mr. Bossman]

Yeah, Ms. Bossman loves to look at my cock while she strokes it. it gets her all tore up.

 

[smartandsexy]

In terms of individuals, as many have already said, who the willy is attached to is the most important thing by far.

But I do happen to think it's very sad and I'd even posit morally wrong to mutilate a child's genitals for no reason. It's not a social norm here...tends to be done only for religious or medical reasons. But to circumsize a baby as what is essentially a cosmetic procedure doesn't seem right. If an adult male chooses to have it done to himself all well and good.

This is probably going to be controversial and I'm probably heading off topic, but hey...

 

[Shale]

Smegma

Smegma ... it builds up if you don't wash, it reeks horribly, and there's no way in hell anyone's gonna kiss you down below if it's not removed entirely.

Actually there are some of us that are into intimate smells and a little smell of smegma is exciting. Not when you can smell the guy three feet away when his foreskin comes back, but that little residual smell when the nose is pressed behind the glans. I've smelled it on uncut guys who were very clean.

I've also smelled it when pressing my nose on a woman's clit. Same stuff, same smell, only less.

But, I'm into the natural human condition and love the smell of armpit odors and ani glands. So, let's hear a collective "EWWW" for nasty Shale, but these odors are how we were always meant to smell, and we have just classed them as unpleasant or unsanitary in our cultural bias.

 

[Shale]

But I do happen to think it's very sad and I'd even posit morally wrong to mutilate a child's genitals for no reason.

I agree wholeheartedly. It should be considered criminal to mutilate a boy. Let it be a decision for adult men whether to mutilate their penis by removing its natural skin covering.

I live in an area where most of the men have migrated from Central or South America or the Caribbean and have not been circumcised. It is primarily a puritan North American practice, which gained great acceptance in the 19th Century as a deterent to masturbation. Yes, it is easier to slide a loose skin back and forth than slide your hand on a skinless shaft. Most people who are cut need to find some kind of lube, but uncut has the natural sliding skin.

I am one of those who prefer seeing and playing with an uncut cock. Like unwrapping a present to have that skin slowly slide back and reveal the hidden head. However, the original post asked for women's opinions.

 

[acamstar]

i prefer cut. the head is the most visually appetizing part of the penis for me. also i've been with an uncut guy before and had to worry about the foreskin peeling back too far, at times... didn't like having to worry about it. his penis reminded me of a worm, or something... the little extra skin hanging over wasn't very pretty. but i have seen a few uncut cocks that are nice looking , as well.

 

[UC_Gav]

As a side question though I have a thing for English guys, and I know in most of europe men are uncut, but what about the English boys? ( I haven't been all the way with one yet! )

Well speaking for myself im Uncut....and since i have alot of female friends i hear stories.
As far as i know most guys are uncut...its usually on Medical or Religious grounds they have it done....like my best friends brother that had to go into hospital cos his foreskin became painfully tight whenever he got an erection.

I couldnt really imagine myself ever getting 'cut'. Mainly cos im a coward and dont like the idea of anything sharp coming near my cock.