tweter (SIC IS INTENDED) Is no fun when youre banned for posting.

hobbit.

Gods rep on Earth.
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Posts
34,913
but you can still 'read only' presumably to keep advertising revenue up.

whats the weirdest thing youve ever been banned for (from anywhere, for anything)
 
but you can still 'read only' presumably to keep advertising revenue up.

whats the weirdest thing youve ever been banned for (from anywhere, for anything)
You didn't by any chance tweet Kier Starmer and call him a cunt for making MPs apologise for joining the RMT picket lines? Cos I did and it got deleted.
 
You didn't by any chance tweet Kier Starmer and call him a cunt for making MPs apologise for joining the RMT picket lines? Cos I did and it got deleted.
kind of, but that wasnt what triggered it. also calling andy burnem a CSE enabler didnt seem to bad. what seemed to trigger it was an innocuous comment that orc saboteurs should be hung as spies, the final nail seemed to be tweeting the indian embassy in london asking them how it felt to be floating on a sea of ukrainian blood, sweat, tears, fears and destroyed lives whilst enjoying cheap russian oil, but could have been copying @mfa Russia in, not sure. Olaf Scholz copped a fair bit aswell. but as the saying goes, if you cant stand the heat stay out of the kitchen. instead thy ban (whilst protecting advertising revenue streams) posters with a valid point. cunts.

starmer...... ray nah is my mp, me and ange did a video once..... only one of us was well dressed.
 
I’ve heard about this “banning” stuff, but I don’t use social media.

I read that a decade or so ago when Butters was going through menopause she went totally powercray and had a bunch of people banned, and even drove the Owner off the site.
 
I’ve heard about this “banning” stuff, but I don’t use social media.

I read that a decade or so ago when Butters was going through menopause she went totally powercray and had a bunch of people banned, and even drove the Owner off the site.
its all done by algorithm now, based on number of complaints received from automated troll accounts. no social interaction at all.
 
kind of, but that wasnt what triggered it. also calling andy burnem a CSE enabler didnt seem to bad. what seemed to trigger it was an innocuous comment that orc saboteurs should be hung as spies, the final nail seemed to be tweeting the indian embassy in london asking them how it felt to be floating on a sea of ukrainian blood, sweat, tears, fears and destroyed lives whilst enjoying cheap russian oil, but could have been copying @mfa Russia in, not sure. Olaf Scholz copped a fair bit aswell. but as the saying goes, if you cant stand the heat stay out of the kitchen. instead thy ban (whilst protecting advertising revenue streams) posters with a valid point. cunts.

starmer...... ray nah is my mp, me and ange did a video once..... only one of us was well dressed.
Please tell me you weren't wearing that Oxfam suit.
 
Please tell me you weren't wearing that Oxfam suit.
its mencap, and maybe. dont see owt wrong wi it me sen old lad.

this is whats wrong with the labour, prefer a paul smith original whilst being interviwed in the people history museum. i thought anges Janet Reger pants were ostentatious.
 
Please tell me you weren't wearing that Oxfam suit.
wait a minute! do you have a problem with people who support oxfam? i knew there was something about you and starmer.
 
I guess it’s more efficient in terms of pissing off larger numbers of people, but it’s like vinyl vs digital, nice to have the warmth.
its not so much vinyl vs digital, its more analogue on a wax cylinder. twatter seems to be populated by the easily offended,
 
I often think of it in terms of Toffler…back in the ‘70’s he said that as the world and information becomes faster that people will feel overwhelmed and become increasingly fearful/unsettled/angry.
 
its mencap, and maybe. dont see owt wrong wi it me sen old lad.

this is whats wrong with the labour, prefer a paul smith original whilst being interviwed in the people history museum. i thought anges Janet Reger pants were ostentatious.
What's she like? She comes across as the nearest thing to a genuine Labour MP that the present front bench have.
 
What's she like? She comes across as the nearest thing to a genuine Labour MP that the present front bench have.
has a unison background. got a decent sense of humour. bangs on to much though about being a single parant like it was some kind of tactical decision on her part. also a bit to respectful to starmer etc - supposedly a corbynite.
 
Back
Top