Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment

M

miles

Guest
You can't make this stuff up...what arrogance!

WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd.

Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.



“She has not committed any crime or made any misrepresentation but under the circumstances she has no choice but to take this course,” said a letter by Taylor to committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, R-Calif. The letter, sent Monday, was obtained Tuesday by the Los Angeles Times.

Taylor, a criminal defense attorney from the Washington firm of Zuckerman Spaeder, said that the Department of Justice has launched a criminal investigation, and that the House committee has asked Lerner to explain why she provided “false or misleading information” to the committee four times last year.

Since Lerner won’t answer questions, Taylor asked that she be excused from appearing, saying that would “have no purpose other than to embarrass or burden her.” There was no immediate word whether the committee will grant her request.


According to an inspector general’s report, Lerner found out in June 2011 that some staff in the nonprofits division in Cincinnati had used terms like “Tea Party” and “Patriots” to select some applications for additional screening of their political activities. She ordered changes.

But neither Lerner nor anyone else at the IRS told Congress, even after repeated queries from several committees, including House Oversight, about whether some groups had been singled out unfairly.
 
How dare she use the Constitution to protect her rights! The nerve!
 
regardless of the statement, the committee should call her and ask every question they planned to ask, forcing her to answer each on CSPAN with, "I invoke my 5th amendment right to remain silent".
 
regardless of the statement, the committee should call her and ask every question they planned to ask, forcing her to answer each on CSPAN with, "I invoke my 5th amendment right to remain silent".

On the grounds I may incriminate myself
 
The Obama Administration Finally Finds A Constitutional Amendment It Can Get Behind:)
 
North Takes Fifth Amendment in Testimony to Senate Panel : Claimed Protection at Least 40 Times, One Source Says

WASHINGTON — Congressional sources said today that fired National Security Council aide Lt. Col. Oliver L. North took the Fifth Amendment during his testimony Monday before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

One source, who, like the others demanded anonymity, said North took the Fifth Amendment at least 40 times. Another source said he declined to answer a number of questions put to him by senators and committee staff members.
 
IRS officials take the 5th not to protect themselves but to protect Obama!:cool:
 
Merc, call your office:


Fox News poll: Majority thinks White House knew about IRS actions
By Dana Blanton
Published May 21, 2013
FoxNews.com


The poll says only 29% think the White House directed the IRS to do what it did. And none of them have any rational reason to believe what they do, they just want it to be true so badly that they say it's true.

Go on record Vette, what do you think is true?
 
The poll says only 29% think the White House directed the IRS to do what it did. And none of them have any rational reason to believe what they do, they just want it to be true so badly that they say it's true.

Go on record Vette, what do you think is true?

I love how you display numbers Merc.

Actually, out of 100% a total of 37% believes the WH knew. Another 29% believes the WH was actively involved.

So, a significant majority (66%) believes the WH knew and DID NOT inform anyone.

Only 24% of those surveyed felt the WH knew nothing nor was involved.
 
Where is the anti-bullying crowd?

Those people bound and determined that our schools and offices have a zero tolerance towards the act?

Is this not a parallel to the women's rights groups who all went silent when President Clinton was going to illegal lengths to make sure Paula Jones was not protected by the very law he signed?





But Ron! he's our bully now!
 
Back
Top