Those IMPLAUSIBLE & IMPOSSIBLE cellphone calls

[unregistered]

 

[Lovelynice]

....

and Pookie, you were the fuckwit who cited a website (911debunk) written by an anonymous total moron who can't spell, who doesn't know grammar, who can't even work out his stupid contradictory statements from each other, and got caught out posting altered photos and photos with false captioning.

Who are you going to cite next as your holy sacred source of bullshit excuses, "joe's blog"?!

 

[Lovelynice]

I did answer...

No, you never have...so please hurry up and do so!

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you do, you LOSE.

You are a nutcase, just as most voters polled stated on this site when asked this question about the Official Conspiracy Theorist claims :

100 witnesses (all from the same company or working at the Pentagon) saw the plane hit the Pentagon, but we have no video to prove it, and it doesn't matter that there's no sign of those huge jet engines hitting the walls, and it's the first time that a plane folded up to go through a little hole - wings and all!

500+ witnesses heard, saw, and felt explosives taking down the WTC buildings, there's hours and hours of video showing explosions going off in long straight lines BEFORE the debris reached the floor, and seismic tremors were impossibly shorter than the collapse times, and it's never before happened in the entire history of steel+concrete skyscrapers have collapsed at almost freefall speed into their own footprint (except with controlled demolitions) ---- but who cares, there's no evidence. All of the hundreds of witnesses were idiots, and don''t watch those videos because they lie.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=448232

and this is how the majority voted;
http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06314/Tinfoil_OCTers.jpg

 

[unregistered]

 

[Lovelynice]

-99.9% of the world's top engineers, architects, physicists, and chemists are all wrong, and I am right...

Show a survey of them to support your claims

Most engineers, architects, physicists, and chemists that I have spoken to about 9/11 agree that the USA government's story is a pile of crap and a great big lie.

 

[Lovelynice]

Check post # 594.

Not before or after but on 9-11 we can point to the Twin Towers .

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.


Are you stupid, why YES YOU ARE!

 

[Lovelynice]

I notice that Pookie the fuckwit has again avoided backing her bullshit when she was caught out in a MAJOR WAY....

The McCormick Center in Chicago and the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania are examples of steel structures collapsing...

LOSE AGAIN, IT WAS NOT A TOWER BUILDING -- it was a low-rise building and nothing like a steel-framed hi-rise tower.

try again, dear.

http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/TR-068.pdf

The Kader Toy Factory also collapsed due to fires...

LOSE AGAIN, IT WAS NOT A TOWER BUILDING -- it was a low-rise 4-storey building and nothing like a steel-framed hi-rise tower..


Pookie's bullshit just dropped dead like a stone.

You're not exactly the brainiest of the bunch are you, dear.....

and yet again, you idiots failed to answer the following

WTC 7 wasn't hit by any plane.

and it's collapse was EXACTLY like any other controlled demolition. Explain that.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif


and WTC 1 & 2 both went STRAIGHT-DOWN just like controlled demolitions do.

3 steel-framed buildings doing on ONE DAY doing what can only be done with, and has only been done, with CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.

Your excuse fails.

Do try again, dear. It isn't difficult to use your brain.

No plane hit this building - it's a typical controlled demolition
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-11.gif

So is this...
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc7/oslo_demo_clips.jpg

and neither did a plane hit this building...and it's an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/hsw_implosion.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_collapse_lg.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_cbs_lowman.gif


Just like this is a controlled demolition...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-9.gif

and despite your bullshit excuses, this one is an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/image023.jpg

and NONE OF YOU moronic lying government trolls has ever been able to cite anything to back your 9/11 "Arabs did it with boxcutters" silliness with an answer to this;

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED TOWER buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

For MONTHS, AND MONTHS, AND MONTHS you shills have never been able to answer this. Instead, like Pookie the nutter has done, the government trolls have tried to pass of LOW-RISE buildings as if they were hi-rises, tried to pass off CONCRETE buildings as if they were steel-framed (KRcummings did that), and one of the total losers even tried to pass off a 4-storey WOODEN-FRAMED BRICK TOWN-HOUSE as if it were a steel-framed tower building.

 

[MinkSoul]

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.


Are you stupid, why YES YOU ARE!

Since no one ( other then the September 11th hijackers) has flown a fully fuelled large aircraft into a building, either before or after September 11th, that is, pretty much, a no brainer.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[MinkSoul]

You're having waay too much fun here Vetteman.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[8ball]

Well, I too was skeptical. I mean, how could President Bush orchestrate such a hideous and yet beautifully complex scheme? I've read every post of LN, and frankly, things started to click in the back of my mind. So, I began my own investigations based on a tip from a very old family friend, who is well connected in the bureaucracy. I am now ready to release my findings and I know that when I do, you too, will be unable to deny the truth anylonger. Even the biggest government drones in here must change their mind as they become enlightened.....

George Bush is in fact, Darth Sidious!!!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/hitsquad/sidious.jpg



Search your feelings for you know it to be true!!!


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/hitsquad/bush-dictator.jpg

 

[Lovelynice]

Well, I too was skeptical. I mean, how could President Bush orchestrate such a hideous and yet beautifully complex scheme?

Leading Conservatives also suspect a 9/11 Cover-Up

Is questioning the government's version of what happened on 9/11 a traitorous activity? Is it something cooked up by liberals and the Democrat party to weaken the conservative movement or to undermine the President's ability to lead the country in this dangerous time?

Well, let's see what leading conservatives have to say:

Current Republican Congressman states that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"(http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/170107paul.mp3)

Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee, has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050917&articleId=965), is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers(http://republican.meetup.com/92/boards/view/viewthread?thread=1870074#3854412), and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job (http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10365)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan said that the official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt" (http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm)

Former high-ranking Reagan official and very influential conservative finds "massive evidence that the 9/11 Commission Report is a hoax" (http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/#Roberts)

Former Air Force Colonel and Pentagon official, who was part of the influential Office of Special Plans, and who was at the Pentagon on 9/11 does not believe the official story regarding 9/11 (http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/#Kwiatkowski")(see also this essay - http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski88.html )

In addition, the following high-level military and intelligence personnel have also questioned 9/11 (it is not clear whether or not they are conservatives; but their credentials are impressive):
Retired Lieutenant Colonel who served 21 years in the U.S. Marine Corps, a fighter pilot who flew over 300 combat missions, questions the official version of 9/11 and said "This isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our country, our constitution, and our future...Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away."(http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/#Lankford)

Former 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_David_Steele) stated that "9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war"(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cu...mer-reviews.sort_by=-SubmissionDate&n=283155), and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006)

Former FBI translator, who the Department of Justice's Inspector General and several senators have called extremely credible (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/n...ml?ex=1153886400&en=13842175814b8e8c&ei=5070), said "If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up"(http://baltimorechronicle.com/050704SibelEdmonds.shtml). She also is leaning towards the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job

Former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions(http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm) believes that the military was intentionally disabled on 9/11 in order to allow the attacks to succeed (see also this statement - http://www.exerscape.com/graphics/bowman-interview.mp3)

High-ranking general and the former chief of NATO (in Danish; hint -- he mentions bombs in the Twin Towers) (http://www.danmarksavis.dk/videos/arkiv/bomberne.der/forsvandt.02.mov)

 

[Lovelynice]

Since no one ...

Hmmm...you forgot WTC 7 again, didn't you little boy?

NO PLANE HIT THIS BUILDING

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/hsw_implosion.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_collapse_lg.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_cbs_lowman.gif

and it looks just like any other clearly recognisable typical controlled demolitions
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-11.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc7/oslo_demo_clips.jpg

 

[Lovelynice]

Lovely....

vetteman is still in kindergarten - He likes to post cartoon pictures because he can't win debates with facts.

When Americans travel overseas, they'll start finding it quite a shock when they learn that internationally the Bush Administrations lies about 9/11 are not believed, nor accepted, by any country outside the USA/UK axis....and very few people internationally even then, including in the mainstream international news media which greets the 9/11 fairytale with utter contempt and open scepticism.

The scepticism is the same as any that people would greet the wild claims of any dictatorship such as North Korea, or Nazi Germany, or the wild propaganda lies of the old Soviet Union

Here's an example;

Largest Swiss Paper Asks
If Bush Was Behind 911
By Elie Peter
9-18-6

ZURICH -- 2,973 humans died with the attacks of 9/11. "Bin Laden" and

"Al Qaeda", the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version.

Now, Swiss university professors Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) raise hot new questions.

"Something is not correct", says strategy expert Stahel in "World Week", and refers to the "incomplete" official US Government 9/11 Report of 2004.

The university professor confirms his criticism in VIEW:

"Osama Bin Laden cannot be 'the large godfather' behind the attacks. He did not have enough means of communication".

Stahel doubts that a passenger airliner crashed into the Pentagon:

"For trainee pilots it is actually impossible to crash into the building so exactly. Seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, the World trade center Building 7 next to it also collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Nothing at all is clear."

Raising questions along with Stahel is historian Dr. Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich.

Dr. Daniele Ganser

Dr. Ganser also calls the official US version "a conspiracy theory".

"There are 3 theories, which we should treat equally":

1. "Surprise theory" - Bin Laden and Al Qaeda implemented the attacks.

2. "Let it happen on purpose" - The US Government knew the Al Qaeda plans and did not react in order to legitimize a series of wars.

3. "Made it happen on purpose" - The attacks were actually planned and orchestrated by the Pentagon and/or US secret services.

Ganser: "3,000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests. The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version. It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. Bush has lied so much already! And we already know that the US government planned an operation in 1962 (Operation Northwoods) that was approved by the Pentagon that would have sacrificed innocent US citizens for the government's own interests."

As far as Ganser and Stahel go: "We only ask questions."

Swiss version: http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057

English Translation:

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://www.blick.ch/news/ausla\ nd%2F9-11%2Fartikel45057&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=
UTF-8&oe=UTF-\ 8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools

The Official Lies are dying in the light of day, and evidence...


RESULTS OF ONLINE POLLS ABOUT 9/11
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/believe_conspiracy2.jpg
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/gov_involved2.jpg
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/wisconson_teach2.jpg
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/march2006/240306poll1.jpg

You idiots aren't even in the majority on THIS SITE
when asked this question about the Official Conspiracy Theorist claims :
100 witnesses (all from the same company or working at the Pentagon) saw the plane hit the Pentagon, but we have no video to prove it, and it doesn't matter that there's no sign of those huge jet engines hitting the walls, and it's the first time that a plane folded up to go through a little hole - wings and all!

500+ witnesses heard, saw, and felt explosives taking down the WTC buildings, there's hours and hours of video showing explosions going off in long straight lines BEFORE the debris reached the floor, and seismic tremors were impossibly shorter than the collapse times, and it's never before happened in the entire history of steel+concrete skyscrapers have collapsed at almost freefall speed into their own footprint (except with controlled demolitions) ---- but who cares, there's no evidence. All of the hundreds of witnesses were idiots, and don''t watch those videos because they lie.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=448232

and this is how the majority voted;
http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06314/Tinfoil_OCTers.jpg

 

[Lovelynice]

NONE OF YOU moronic lying government trolls has ever been able to cite anything to back your 9/11 "Arabs did it with boxcutters" silliness with an answer to this;

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED TOWER buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

STILL WAITING!.

waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and ....

and I'm still waiting for them to back their bullshit

 

[phrodeau]

You haven't even tried to prove that no plane hit WTC7, have you?

It shouldn't be too difficult - a couple of eyewitness accounts, an inventory of the remains; with your resources you should easily be able to produce solid proof that the jets which struck WTC1 and WTC2 did not connect with WTC7 enroute to their final resting place. How about it?

 

[Lovelynice]

You haven't even ...

Do you have a problem with reality, phrodeau? Apparently you do. Damn your Mommy must be disappointed in your thickheaded lack of intelligence.

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED TOWER buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

 

[Lovelynice]

It's not like these idiotic liars for the USA government are believed by the majority, is it?

Most people don't believe USA government's lies about 9/11 or any of their other bullshit crapola, nor any of you shills' increasingly dumb excuses.

RESULTS OF ONLINE POLLS ABOUT 9/11
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/believe_conspiracy2.jpg
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/gov_involved2.jpg
http://fawkesfiles.com/graphics/polls/polls_large/wisconson_teach2.jpg
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/march2006/240306poll1.jpg

You idiots aren't even in the majority on THIS SITE
when asked this question about the Official Conspiracy Theorist claims :
100 witnesses (all from the same company or working at the Pentagon) saw the plane hit the Pentagon, but we have no video to prove it, and it doesn't matter that there's no sign of those huge jet engines hitting the walls, and it's the first time that a plane folded up to go through a little hole - wings and all!

500+ witnesses heard, saw, and felt explosives taking down the WTC buildings, there's hours and hours of video showing explosions going off in long straight lines BEFORE the debris reached the floor, and seismic tremors were impossibly shorter than the collapse times, and it's never before happened in the entire history of steel+concrete skyscrapers have collapsed at almost freefall speed into their own footprint (except with controlled demolitions) ---- but who cares, there's no evidence. All of the hundreds of witnesses were idiots, and don''t watch those videos because they lie.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=448232

and this is how the majority voted;
http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06314/Tinfoil_OCTers.jpg