Those IMPLAUSIBLE & IMPOSSIBLE cellphone calls

[Lovelynice]

... gravitational potential energy is yet?

You should do some research, dear.

Since you have never shown there was enough energy for a gravitationally driven collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7. That, little boy, means that gravity alone could not provide the energy to make steel-frames collapse STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own bases against their own structural resistance and through themselves.

If you believe otherwise, then please show a mathematical or computer simulation that successfully simulates the collapses themselves of all three WTC buildings WTC 1, 2, & 7.

I already know that you can't, because nobody has ever succeeded in doing so. All that you idiots have shown have turned out to be liars and frauds. Afterall, no steel-frame tower building has EVER collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN through their own structure before or since 9/11 except with CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS. If you want to claim otherwise, then back your bullshit with some photos and/video of such an event. I know you can't, BECAUSE IT'S NEVER HAPPENED.

All such collapses have been CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.

You can never win, SeanH, if you can't answer such a simple problem....

WTC 7 wasn't hit by any plane.

and it's collapse was EXACTLY like any other controlled demolition. Explain that.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif


and WTC 1 & 2 both went STRAIGHT-DOWN just like controlled demolitions do.

3 steel-framed buildings doing on ONE DAY doing what can only be done with, and has only been done, with CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.

Your excuse fails.

Do try again, SeanH. It isn't difficult to use your brain.

No plane hit this building - it's a typical controlled demolition
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-11.gif

So is this...
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc7/oslo_demo_clips.jpg

and neither did a plane hit this building...and it's an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/hsw_implosion.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_collapse_lg.gif
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/wtc7_cbs_lowman.gif


Just like this is a controlled demolition...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/building-implosion-9.gif

and despite your bullshit excuses, this one is an obvious controlled demolition too...
http://xs513.xs.to/xs513/07104/image023.jpg

and NONE OF YOU moronic lying government trolls has ever been able to cite anything to back your 9/11 "Arabs did it with boxcutters" silliness with an answer to this;

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

For MONTHS, AND MONTHS, AND MONTHS you shills have never been able to answer this.


Deal with it.

 

[Lovelynice]

Government complicit in 9/11

January 10, 2006

Bush told us that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.

Bush told us that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.

Bush told us that Saddam Hussein had mobile chemical labs to churn out weapons of mass destruction. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.

Bush assured us that our government was always getting warrants when conducting domestic wire-tapping, that his administration would stop paying for fake news articles that were made to look real, that nobody in his administration broke Valerie Plame's cover, and that our government isn't torturing people or maintaining secret prisons in foreign countries. None of this was true.

And worst of all, Bush told us that the terror attacks of 9/11 were conducted entirely by foreign terrorists and that all of our defenses just happened to fail.

We didn't question it.

We didn't ask for a single shred of evidence.

But this almost certainly wasn't true either.

I challenge everyone to read David Ray Griffin's essay, "The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot be True."

It's on the internet.

And Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, inadvertently admitted that controlled demolition brought down one of the buildings -just Google "Silverstein Pull It Comment."

If you have the courage to open your mind and actually review the facts, you will agree that the evidence of government complicity in 9/11 is overwhelming.

written by Frank B. Haddleton

Burlington

 

[Sean]

LMAO. You can't use what passes for your brain, love. All you can do is repeat ad nauseam what other people have told you. Here's something for you to try at home. Pick up something from your desk. A pen, a ball, your tinfoil hat, whatever. Hold it out at arms length and let go of it. See what happens? That's because of gravitational potential energy. Look it up. When you actually understand some of the physics you pretend to know about, get back to me.

 

[Lovelynice]

Actually, 911debunker ...*

Is a site lacking in credibility in a very big way.

It's a website whose pages are filled with errors, poor and childish grammar and arguments that not only defy common sense but often contradict each another.

The website is filled with misspellings, inaccurate terms and childish levels ofl grammar.

If people had found a few typos they would be only nitpicking if they thought the site had a few problems, but if this site's author can't even construct a basic sentence how can he or she be trusted to refute the scientific analysis of a career physics professor such as Steven Jones, or any of the other academics who publicly declared the 9/11 official story as being lies and nonsense.

The author uses the buzzword of 9/11 official story conspiracy theorists in citing the "logical fallacies" allegedly associated with 9/11 skeptic's arguments and yet the website's Building 7 page betrays the biggest logical fallacy by completely contradicting itself.

Anyone can look through the website for themselves - and it won't be long before they come across bizarre and silly arguments (at one point the collapse of the twin towers is compared to two pool balls hitting each other), even silly statements that are barely comprehensible as being in the English language, and outright errors concerning the claims of the 9/11 truth movement.

The anonymous troll who made the site apparently doesn't notice the contradictions and their own lies either.

On the 911debunk site, they frequently use copy & pasted altered images like this one. Do you believe this reveals their honesty or that they are yet another lying site filled with strawman arguments and assertions about the 9/11 sceptics who refuse to believe the US government's Official Conspiracy Theory ("Arabs did it", etc...)?

The image is from NIST supposedly, but it's clearly photoshopped two separate images and joined them together. There are many images on the site which have been photoshopped like this one.

http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/sag.ht2.jpg

There are many photoshopped images similar to this one on that site. I've found a few. I advise anyone looking at that site take the images with a huge amount of cynicism and check them carefully. By the way, the altered photo above was used by a shill like you on another site to claim that it showed bowing; but the image is not credible because it's been ALTERED. When that shill was asked to provide the two original images before the photoshopping, they could not. It would not be submissible in a courtroom.

When asked about the original two photos that were used to create this image, nobody could ever provide them for comparison to see how much photoshopping was actually done to the image. That destroys it's credibility. Also, on the 911debunk site at the time that I first saw this image posted, it was misrepresented there as well...and it's not the only photoshopped image on this site; some are more subtle, and not so easy for casual notice to pick. That to me is very dishonest.

I would like to see the original two photos which they used instead of this deceptive image.

 

[Lovelynice]

Pick up something from your desk. A pen, a ball, your tinfoil hat, whatever. Hold it out at arms length and let go of it. See what happens?

Hmmm.... and this is somehow related to a steel-framed tower building collapsing in upon itself in what way, Mr Nutcase?

Apparently from your excuse, all trees should collapses in upon their structure STRAIGHT-DOWN into the ground. I ask again for you to back your bullshit;
EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you can, you have FUCKING NOTHING...

bit like what's between your ears

 

[Sean]

Hmmm.... and this is somehow related to a steel-framed tower building collapsing in upon itself in what way, Mr Nutcase?

Apparently from your excuse, all trees should collapses in upon their structure STRAIGHT-DOWN into the ground. I ask again for you to back your bullshit;
EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you can, you have FUCKING NOTHING...

bit like what's between your ears

While you're looking up P.E, look up reaction forces too. You're a moron with no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Lovelynice]

While you're looking ....

What's wrong, SeanH?
Can't deal with REALITY???

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO BACK YOUR BULLSHIT, MORON????

 

[Byron In Exile]

Okay

I'm still going to need to see some ID, sir.

Voiceprint:

http://www.alphabit.net/Glottophilia/uploaded_images/voiceprints-737492.gif

Retina scan:

http://web.mit.edu/veb/retina%20prints/ANANDA6.jpg

Palm print:

http://www.philena.co.uk/images/handprint.jpg

 

[Lovelynice]

This message is hidden because Byron In Exile is on your ignore list.

No idea what crap you're saying, Byron

 

[unregistered]

 

[Lovelynice]

http://i5...[/QUOTE] Hello Miles...well, at least you're as braindead as he is :rolleyes: EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition. Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this? With a photo, video, or anything else. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO BACK YOUR BULLSHIT, MORON????

 

[unregistered]

 

[phrodeau]

LN is complaining about "misspellings, inaccurate terms and childish levels ofl grammar"?

*snerk*

 

[Lovelynice]

You really need ....

You really need to back your bullshit since in the months of your posting in reply to me, you have never succeeded in answering this;

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO BACK YOUR BULLSHIT, MORON????

Simple problem, vetteman, you want to claim that an impossible thing happened as if by magic, well you'll have prove that it's possible.

Since you have never been able to back your bullshit, you are proving that you and your silly fucked-in-the-head lying cohorts in the shill department to be a bunch of delusional lunatics.

 

[Lovelynice]

LN is complaining about "misspellings, inaccurate terms and childish levels ofl grammar"?

Yes, and Pookie was trying to pretend that the 911debunk site had some credibilty despite being written by a moron. I'm not surprised really, afterall,
you have never managed to back your bullshit either.

EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you do, you LOSE.

 

[Lovelynice]

I don't know how you nutcases can cope with your defence of the official bullshit story about 9/11 with all those fantastic tales of indestructible passports, trillions to one coincidences, outright impossibilities (such as the cellphone calls that were in fact fake), the faked "Osama bin Laden confession video", the lies about Osama bin Laden being alive when his death back on the 16th December 2001 was widely reported in the news, and every video of OBL since has proven to be a fake, and every audiotape of OBL has also been proven to be a fake. It's all the same lies, from the same LYING source that tried to sell us LIES about WMDs in Iraq, and told lies about the forged Niger Documents.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

You know what guys, I just read a good bit of this whole thread and I have to take back my skepticism. I'm now convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. There is simply no doubt. Here's what I learned from this thread:

-Although the 1993 WTC bombing was obviously the work of terrorists, the idea that the 2001 attacks were perpetrated by terrorists is ludicrous.

-Incompetence, being unprepared, not foreseeing events, rushed decisions, finger pointing, blame trading, and hysteria equal "conspiracy."

-More information only muddles "the truth:" The most accurate and complete reports of any disaster are from selections of the first hurried reports, not from more complete, thoughtful analysis and more thorough eyewitness reports that come later.

-Steel supports must liquefy at their melting point of 3000°F in order to weaken and fail, and everything that metallurgists and engineers have told us about heat of only about 700°F weakening steel is false, and for thousands of years, metal workers like blacksmiths and armorers have just had it all wrong, because they only needed large blast furnaces, spigots, and molds to form horseshoes, swords, and plowshares from liquid metal, and they didn't need a hammer and anvil, as you see in Hollywood movies' special effects.

-If there is disagreement on the approach angle and bank of the plane hitting the Pentagon in an official report and from online bloggers, then we can safely assume that the plane, in fact, did not exist.

-George W. Bush is at once America's most deviously intelligent autocrat and its most stupidest president ever.

-99.9% of the world's top engineers, architects, physicists, and chemists are all wrong, and I am right, because I read the Intarweb and I am so smart.

-I can't be wrong because thousands of people believe my theories. But you can be wrong even though hundreds of millions believe you, because we all know there are millions of stupid people in the world.

-People will see what they want to see, and believe what they want to believe. Because rubbing someone's face in their own absurd beliefs only makes them close their eyes tighter, the claims in this list will continue to be believed by many. To all others: May our future rest in your capable hands.

Off to bed now. See ya

Woof!

 

[KRCummings]

I don't know how you nutcases can cope with your defence of the official bullshit story about 9/11 with all those fantastic tales of indestructible passports, trillions to one coincidences, outright impossibilities (such as the cellphone calls that were in fact fake), the faked "Osama bin Laden confession video", the lies about Osama bin Laden being alive when his death back on the 16th December 2001 was widely reported in the news, and every video of OBL since has proven to be a fake, and every audiotape of OBL has also been proven to be a fake. It's all the same lies, from the same LYING source that tried to sell us LIES about WMDs in Iraq, and told lies about the forged Niger Documents.

Did you hear about the moon landing? Yeah, faked! Can you believe it? Done in a fuckin' studio! I know! Hard to believe but it's true!

And JFK? It was Johnson all along, right behind the grassy knoll!

And don't even get me started on the Jews with their 'holocaust.'
What a load of shit that is!

 

[unregistered]

 

[Pookie]

Is a site lacking in credibility in a very big way.

It's a website whose pages are filled with errors, poor and childish grammar and arguments that not only defy common sense but often contradict each another.

The website is filled with misspellings, inaccurate terms and childish levels ofl grammar.

If people had found a few typos they would be only nitpicking if they thought the site had a few problems, but if this site's author can't even construct a basic sentence how can he or she be trusted to refute the scientific analysis of a career physics professor such as Steven Jones, or any of the other academics who publicly declared the 9/11 official story as being lies and nonsense.

Einstein sucked at spelling English too, calling it the "the treacherous spelling". He wasn't so bad at physics though. Prof Jones can't even get his paper peer-reviewed in appropriate journals. His own university disowned his sloppy science.

Wait, that's ex-Prof Jones. LOL

All your logical fallacies aren't helping your cause, snookums.

*shakes head disappointedly*

But do continue with all your repeated C&Ps all over the intrawebs. We're all proud that you've mastered that skill. Now, you keep playing nice, and I'll see if your caregivers will let you play with the crayons again.

 

[Pookie]

I don't know how you nutcases can cope with your defence of the official bullshit story about 9/11 with all those fantastic tales of indestructible passports, trillions to one coincidences, outright impossibilities (such as the cellphone calls that were in fact fake), the faked "Osama bin Laden confession video", the lies about Osama bin Laden being alive when his death back on the 16th December 2001 was widely reported in the news, and every video of OBL since has proven to be a fake, and every audiotape of OBL has also been proven to be a fake. It's all the same lies, from the same LYING source that tried to sell us LIES about WMDs in Iraq, and told lies about the forged Niger Documents.

Buttercup, not all of us can live in your fantasy world of evil empires and such. But it does seem to keep you occupied ... all over the intrawebs. So, I guess that's a good thing.

 

[Pookie]

Voiceprint:

http://www.alphabit.net/Glottophilia/uploaded_images/voiceprints-737492.gif

Retina scan:

http://web.mit.edu/veb/retina%20prints/ANANDA6.jpg

Palm print:

http://www.philena.co.uk/images/handprint.jpg

Your papers appear to be in order. You may continue on your journey.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Lovelynice]

And it can finally be revealed...

That you still can't answer a simple problem;
EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you do, you LOSE.

You are a nutcase, just as most voters polled stated on this site when asked this question about the Official Conspiracy Theorist claims :

100 witnesses (all from the same company or working at the Pentagon) saw the plane hit the Pentagon, but we have no video to prove it, and it doesn't matter that there's no sign of those huge jet engines hitting the walls, and it's the first time that a plane folded up to go through a little hole - wings and all!

500+ witnesses heard, saw, and felt explosives taking down the WTC buildings, there's hours and hours of video showing explosions going off in long straight lines BEFORE the debris reached the floor, and seismic tremors were impossibly shorter than the collapse times, and it's never before happened in the entire history of steel+concrete skyscrapers have collapsed at almost freefall speed into their own footprint (except with controlled demolitions) ---- but who cares, there's no evidence. All of the hundreds of witnesses were idiots, and don''t watch those videos because they lie.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=448232

and this is how the majority voted;
http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06314/Tinfoil_OCTers.jpg

 

[Lovelynice]

....

You still can't answer a simple problem;
EVERY OTHER OCCASSION both before and since Sept 11 2001, when STEEL-FRAMED tower buildings collapsed STRAIGHT-DOWN into their own footprint, it has been due to a controlled demolition.

Can any of you silly shills cite a single exception to this?

With a photo, video, or anything else.

Until you do, you LOSE.

Now grow up, dear and stop blathering