This Needed To be Said

[HisArpy]

What about termagants?

AWFL works too.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

If Rightguide is single I am sure he has an easy time getting dates. If he is married, I am equally sure his wife is desirable and loves him.

Fag.

 

[RoryN]

If Rightguide is single I am sure he has an easy time getting dates. If he is married, I am equally sure his wife is desirable and loves him.

Oh - you're a performance alt. I finally get it.

 

[Bn2f]

I am not here to troll. I am here to discuss important, complex, and controversial issues with intelligence, knowledge, and civility.

Sir, I like you. We both have been here long enough to garner likes from our respective posts. That’s fine that you YOU are not here to troll. But, I do and with that comes the very real possibility of not having my methods liked by members perceived to be on the left. I’ve addressed how I deal with that while also telling you that many interactions here frustrate me, but I think that I have generally kept my frustration hidden and me stopping myself from commenting. I am now going to drop my filters and ask you Whydafuk are you continuing with this line of questioning to me when: 1. I gave you respectful reply already. 2. You are not as persistent in seeking an explanation from the OP on his misogyny or for a reply to YOUR post directly to him. 3. RG and his postings do not exist in a vacuum. You are not so obtuse to come here on a regular basis granting that today will be the day that he doesn’t stoop to some level of deplorable stereotyping. “When they show you who they are, believe them.” I do not know your race, but as another member hinted at earlier, few have the privilege, as you seem to have, to believe that a racist today won’t be the same racist they run into tomorrow.

 

[Bn2f]

If Rightguide is single I am sure he has an easy time getting dates. If he is married, I am equally sure his wife is desirable and loves him.

Whaaaaat Da Fuuuuuuuuuk is this taint sniffing bullshit?!!!
This is a huge fail if you’re attempting sarcasm.

I’m done. Say whatever you care to. You can have the last word. I have no interest in replying anymore to your ass.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Contempt for women who reject their biological roles is not misogyny, it's...sanity in a world addicted to delusion.

How do you know what all women think, are you one?

Sorry to interrupt, but speaking of biology....
I finally know why you have two more brain cells than a chicken.
It's nature's way of making sure you don't shit in front of the house.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Not to despair. Men are waking up and walking away from the harpy's

We are all sick of the Harpy's too....and the rest of your 20 (and counting) of your screen names. Take the hint, glamorillawallstreetguy.

This thread is fucking stupid anyway. Typical incel misogyny one would expect of the O.P. who obviously, if he's ever even been laid in his life (questionable) probably hasn't gotten any in the last 10 years (highly probable.)

 

[Meekly_Anna]

I'm afraid I must apologise. Unfounded and stupid insults are things that must be categorised as belonging to the American right.
What I wrote is clearly cultural appropriation.

 

[icanhelp1]

It's a pitiful sight to behold as was today's Appeals Court reversal of Federal District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who obviously doesn't know the extent of her own jurisdiction and that of the Court of Federal Claims. Both are insufferable incompetents advanced by Obama and Biden.

How many reversals does this make?

 

[JohnEngelman]

Sir, I like you. We both have been here long enough to garner likes from our respective posts. That’s fine that you YOU are not here to troll. But, I do and with that comes the very real possibility of not having my methods liked by members perceived to be on the left. I’ve addressed how I deal with that while also telling you that many interactions here frustrate me, but I think that I have generally kept my frustration hidden and me stopping myself from commenting. I am now going to drop my filters and ask you Whydafuk are you continuing with this line of questioning to me when: 1. I gave you respectful reply already. 2. You are not as persistent in seeking an explanation from the OP on his misogyny or for a reply to YOUR post directly to him. 3. RG and his postings do not exist in a vacuum. You are not so obtuse to come here on a regular basis granting that today will be the day that he doesn’t stoop to some level of deplorable stereotyping. “When they show you who they are, believe them.” I do not know your race, but as another member hinted at earlier, few have the privilege, as you seem to have, to believe that a racist today won’t be the same racist they run into tomorrow.

I believe that behavior can be evil. Opinions can't be. I am tolerant of opinions that are different from mine. If they are very different I try to understand why they exist. I am particularly tolerant of opinions based on experiences I have not had. I perceive of my emotions as facts about me, rather than truths about ultimate reality.

Although I have known failure and unhappiness, I am not an angry person. I do not look for hate targets. I am white. I am not a white nationalist or a white supremacist. I have never known an Oriental (Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, and Vietnamese) I did not like. I admire Jews. Black criminals have mugged me, robbed me at gunpoint, and nearly murdered me. I also known Negroes I liked.

 

[YDB95]

Lots of folks here are ignorant and haven't a clue what they're talking about as well.

You mean like that guy who posted an anti-feminist screed with a quote from a legendary feminist - Helen Keller - whose point was the exact opposite of the point he was trying to make?

 

[JohnEngelman]

Unfounded and stupid insults are things that must be categorised as belonging to the American right.

I have found unfounded and stupid insults on both ends of the political spectrum.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Lots of folks here are ignorant and haven't a clue what they're talking about as well.

Some posters here are less knowledgeable than you are. Other posters are more knowledgeable.

 

[JohnEngelman]

The biggest threat to the future of the country and our way of life.

I think nuclear war is "the biggest threat to the future of the country and our way of life." I can think of other threats, such as global warming, and over population.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

It’s obvious you are very frustrated at the lack of women willing to debase themselves and fuck you.

Lol

Submit l, you.heathen wominz!

Nothing needs to be said. You need to tell the world about women who you hate.... constantly.

How did I know our resident feminists would be the first dissenting voices!

 

[Lance_Castro]

Rightguard using Helen Keller to argue against feminism is delightful!

Lol


“Born to wealth in Alabama, Keller lost her sight and hearing before she was two. She learned to read braille, communicate through sign as well as speech, and graduated from Radcliffe College in 1904. She was the first deaf-blind person to earn a bachelor’s degree.

After college Keller became a renowned speaker and author, gaining fame advocating for her community. Best remembered as an activist for disabled peoples, Keller also spoke out for woman suffrage, birth control, and pacifism. She was also a radical socialist who focused her efforts on working people’s issues and became a member of the International Workers of the World.

Later in life she advocated against U.S. imperialism and railed against the power of wealth in government. In 1920, the same year as the ratification of the 19th Amendment, Keller co-founded the American Civil Liberties Union. Then as now, the American public celebrated Keller’s activism for women and disabled people while glossing over her more radical politics and her efforts on behalf of woman suffrage.”

 

[Meekly_Anna]

I have found unfounded and stupid insults on both ends of the political spectrum.

Yes, you have, like everyone, but my jokes about them are funny.

 

[ll74]

How did I know our resident feminists would be the first dissenting voices!

Dissemting from angry man misogyny?

Absolutely.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Left-wing, unmarriable women are a useless burden to the country.

The Vettebigot hides his adoration for sheep almost as well as the Islamophobic bigot hides her admiration for Jews who starve children.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Left-wing, unmarriable women are a useless burden to the country.

Why are left wing women unmarriageable? Lots of them get married.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Why are left wing women unmarriageable? Lots of them get married.

Yep.

 

[stxjimmy]

Why are left wing women unmarriageable? Lots of them get married.

Other posters are more knowledgeable.

You already answered.

 

[stxjimmy]

Suburban sprawl ripped our social fabric apart. Women lost the social groups and connections where they held informal power to decide which men would hold formal power. Without their informal power networks, they started seeking formal power. Corporations welcomed them in workplaces as more consumers who would not have time for home cooking, home tailoring, etc., so they must buy more corporate merchandise. And now the suburban sprawl is starting to reverse. We can't and won't go back to exactly what we had before suburban sprawl. Many women will keep formal power and jobs. Many men will stay home and be full time parents and housekeepers. But we will be forced to do more of what works and drop what fails in employment and domestic arrangements.

Incoherent rambling.

 

[HisArpy]

Suburban sprawl ripped our social fabric apart. Women lost the social groups and connections where they held informal power to decide which men would hold formal power. Without their informal power networks, they started seeking formal power. Corporations welcomed them in workplaces as more consumers who would not have time for home cooking, home tailoring, etc., so they must buy more corporate merchandise. And now the suburban sprawl is starting to reverse. We can't and won't go back to exactly what we had before suburban sprawl. Many women will keep formal power and jobs. Many men will stay home and be full time parents and housekeepers. But we will be forced to do more of what works and drop what fails in employment and domestic arrangements.

In a way this is true, and in a way it's not. After WWII when urban communities began to be created, what happened is that rural areas began to shrink and thereby lose their input into community values and direction. As more and more urbanites banded together, the waning input from rural areas became even less as suburban neighborhood turned into urban neighborhood and dependency on corporate largess and social services became more common.

Eventually urban and suburban areas will consume rural areas and another great upheaval in society will occur. How that will manifest is unknown but historically all of the great changes in society have involved plague, destruction, famine, or even all of the above.

What's interesting is that this "great change" can be applied to politics. Eventually the democrat ideology will prevail simply because there are more of them than conservative and that gap is growing. Once society evolves to pure democracy the downfall begins as socialism takes over, then revolution to totalitarianism, de evolution of society to basic fundamentals and minimal population, and the eventual rebellion back to liberty and expansion and advancement of society.

This is a process which has been playing out for millenia and will continue to do so.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Suburban sprawl ripped our social fabric apart. Women lost the social groups and connections where they held informal power to decide which men would hold formal power. Without their informal power networks, they started seeking formal power. Corporations welcomed them in workplaces as more consumers who would not have time for home cooking, home tailoring, etc., so they must buy more corporate merchandise. And now the suburban sprawl is starting to reverse. We can't and won't go back to exactly what we had before suburban sprawl. Many women will keep formal power and jobs. Many men will stay home and be full time parents and housekeepers. But we will be forced to do more of what works and drop what fails in employment and domestic arrangements.

Equal rights for women and men are not just a matter of fairness but a fundamental necessity for a just and prosperous society. The argument for equality rests on several key principles.

First, the principle of inherent human dignity dictates that all individuals, regardless of their gender, are born with equal value and deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. Denying women the same rights as men is a violation of this basic principle and represents a form of discrimination that holds back human potential.

Second, from a moral and ethical standpoint, it is indefensible to claim that one half of the population is inherently less capable or deserving than the other. This view is not only scientifically unsound but also deeply unjust. Women and men possess the same range of intelligence, emotional depth, and capacity for innovation, and their rights should reflect this fundamental truth.

Finally, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and many other international conventions affirm that human rights are universal and apply to every person. Gender should not be a barrier to exercising these rights. To argue otherwise is to reject the very foundation of modern human rights law.

Gender equality isn't just a moral imperative; it's a strategic advantage that leads to more successful and resilient societies.

When women have the same access to education, employment, and leadership opportunities as men, they can contribute their full potential to the economy. Studies by organisations like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have repeatedly shown that economies with greater gender equality tend to have higher GDP per capita, lower poverty rates, and more innovation. By excluding half of the population from key economic roles, a society effectively operates with one hand tied behind its back.

Diverse leadership, including equal representation of women, leads to better decision-making. Women often bring different perspectives and experiences to the table, which can help create more comprehensive and effective policies. For example, research suggests that countries with more female parliamentarians tend to have lower levels of corruption and a greater focus on social welfare policies.

Gender-equal societies are generally more stable and peaceful. When women are empowered, they are more likely to participate in peace-building processes, and their increased status within the family and community leads to better health and education outcomes for their children. This, in turn, creates a more educated and healthy workforce for the future.

In short, a society that values and empowers all its members, regardless of gender, unlocks its full potential. It’s not about giving something to women that they didn't have before; it’s about removing the artificial barriers that have prevented everyone from thriving.


I dare say I blasted your arguments, if there were any, out of the water.