There's no end to Obama's Opulence

let me get this straight

an anonymous source in India HEARD this was going to cost 200 Million a day..and you gullible fuckers believed it without even bothering looking twice?

I get more crack reporting from kindergarten kids about who has cooties

Great, you made me spit water all over my monitor..
As Bugs would say about anyone who bought this load of bullshit..
"What a gulla-bull.. What an ultra-maroon.. What a nin-cow-poop.."


Good Lord, the desperation of the right is palpable.
LMAO
 
Great, you made me spit water all over my monitor..
As Bugs would say about anyone who bought this load of bullshit..
"What a gulla-bull.. What an ultra-maroon.. What a nin-cow-poop.."


Good Lord, the desperation of the right is palpable.
LMAO

as if on CUE

a SLAVE from the PLANTATION supports another SLAVE on teh PLANTATION!



This "comment" from a LIB CLOWN that says PALIN is the MOTHER of her daughters BABY!

That he believes

This from someone who actually made a HUGE DEAL of the remodeling contractor of Palins HOUSE and her wardrobe


LOSER!
 
To add to what Mr. Vetteman is talking about...when will Obama come out and say "I recognize that our country is in a time of hardship, that there is considerable worry about our deficit spending and therefore I'm going to take actions to ensure that our Government spending is prudent and circumspect from now on. Given the controversy around my lovely wife's last trip to Spain and my upcoming trip to India, I pledge to take only the staff I need and ensure that our spending for this trip is consistent with our nations goals and needs and is equal to or less than previous President's similar trips".

In fact, it looks like he's taking half of Washington with him and the rough estimates of cost for this massive trip are staggering even if $200M a day is not an exact estimate.
 
You fucking ding dongs spent 8 years posting unsubstantiated bullshit about Bush without even a media article to back it up, so keep your sanctimonious crap to yourself. So when will Obama refute those charges with the true costs?

In the words of AJ

*BINGO*

*SPIT*

During the 08 election THE MOST IMPORTANT issue was Palin wardrobe etc etc

These assholes should STFU!
 
To add to what Mr. Vetteman is talking about...when will Obama come out and say "I recognize that our country is in a time of hardship, that there is considerable worry about our deficit spending and therefore I'm going to take actions to ensure that our Government spending is prudent and circumspect from now on. Given the controversy around my lovely wife's last trip to Spain and my upcoming trip to India, I pledge to take only the staff I need and ensure that our spending for this trip is consistent with our nations goals and needs and is equal to or less than previous President's similar trips".

In fact, it looks like he's taking half of Washington with him and the rough estimates of cost for this massive trip are staggering even if $200M a day is not an exact estimate.

even if $200 million for teh WHOLE TRIP!
 
The LEFT screamed PLASTIC TURKEY

Long after it was refuted


Now they have the nerve to open their MOUTH?

POUR CEMENT DOWN THEIR THROATS!
 
The LEFT is one HIPPO CREEP LOSER AFTER ANOTHER

KEITH OLBERMANN’S POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: “MSNBC host Keith Olbermann made campaign contributions to two Arizona members of Congress and failed Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway ahead of Tuesday’s election — a potential violation of NBC’s ethics policies. . . . Olbermann, who has become of the most prominent liberal commentators on cable television, has been a critic of the political donations made by Fox News’ parent company, News Corp.”
 
sorta kinda funny

how the SLAVES on the PLANTATION are now so IN NEED OF 10000% verifiable fact

aint it?

I know

Palin is really the Mother of her Daughters Kid!:rolleyes:
 
You fucking ding dongs spent 8 years posting unsubstantiated bullshit about Bush without even a media article to back it up, so keep your sanctimonious crap to yourself. So when will Obama refute those charges with the true costs?

God you're a duh-duh-dumbass! You run around searching the internet for the stupidest most trivial items to try and make Obama look bad and if you weren't so busy pissing all over yourselves with glee and actually took a moment to see if it was true you wouldn't look so damn moronic all the time.

Oh, and here's the President's morning agenda:
1) 7:00 - Breakfast
2) 7:30 - Security threat assessment
3) 9:00 - Refute vetteman's lies on Literotica

Fucking moron.
 
It seems unfair to charge the President for the entire Navy and Air Force, for just one day's use. Can't we get some kind of pro-rated deal?

The Navy is willing to negotiate but not the USAF. Not sure why we don't source out aviation to India. You can get a good six India jet pilots flying the same exact aircraft for the same cost as one US Air Force pilot.

There's savings to be had.
 
Last edited:
Well apparently they're reserved two entire hotels, both 5 star I believe. Gotta wonder what that would cost. Thousands of people, the cost of security, logistics, expenses, have to be staggering; and when you start running the Air Force and the Navy around the world, well it can get out of hand in a hurry. I think the 200 million a day is overblown but they have done nothing to mitigate the controversy with figures of their own. The other question is, what exactly is to be gained from this trip to India?

So far Iraq and Afghanistan have cost over one trillion US dollars which is several times the original estimates.

Ongoing operations over the next 50 years will cost US Taxpayers hundreds of billions not to mention taking care of the health of a hundred-thousand veterans. Taxpayers also pay for the US being the primary security force for Korea, Japan, Germany and other countries.

The Obama extravagance is chicken-feed in comparison.


The US Taxpayer takes it in the ass every day.
 
Where did you go to check to see if it's true? Snopes? Where would they get data the government doesn't want to part with?

Now go and take your Metamucil, maybe it will speed up your next rumbling, gaseous, post...ya pompous ass. :rolleyes:

Look, I understand you're a bitter old man well past your prime and still clinging to a mid-life crisis in hopes of feeling younger. It's not up to me to provide the numbers, it's your responsibility for validating a discredited source. Hell, you don't even know the name of the source.

Just another petty, partisan hack with too much time on his hands.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

..White House, DOD Dismiss Asia Trip’s Rumored Price Tag
by Erin Vogel | November 04, 2010

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed reports by Press Trust of India that President Barack Obama's trip to Mumbai and Indonesia would cost the U.S. $200 million per day.

During Thursday's briefing, Gibbs stated that this report was "simply not true."

While Gibbs maintained that he would not go into the actual figure of what it costs to move the president from one country to another, he did state the costs are no more then what it took to travel former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush.

PTI released the article on the president's trip on Tuesday and made additional claims that roughly "3,000 people including Secret Service agents, US government officials and journalists would accompany the President."

White House spokesperson Tommy Vietor said, "The numbers reported in this article have no basis in reality."

Vietor remarked that due to security reasons he could not get into trip details but added the "numbers are wildly inflated."

In another article PTI published Thursday, the report declared the President would "be protected by a fleet of 34 warships."

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell was quick to dispel these accusations during Thursday's briefing.

"I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we are deploying ten percent of the Navy, some 34 ships, and an aircraft carrier in support of the president's trip to Asia -- that's just comical. Nothing close to that is being done."

In a statement also disregarding the PTI projections, Gordon Johndroe, former deputy White House spokesperson under President George W. Bush said, "I am positive there will not be '34 warships' involved in this trip."

Both Morrell and Gibbs reminded the press during their briefings that while the projected trip costs were inaccurate, Mumbai was once a target of terrorist organizations. The secretaries were referring to the November 26, 2009 attack that took place at Taj Mahal hotel, the same hotel President Obama is scheduled to stay. While cost details are not being released for the President's trip this Friday, the White House has stated that they are taking all necessary precautions to keep the president protected while abroad.
 
He's taking 3000 businessmen, you know, a Chamber of Commerce trip.:cool:
 
Back
Top