U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look, I understand you're a bitter old man well past your prime and still clinging to a mid-life crisis in hopes of feeling younger. It's not up to me to provide the numbers, it's your responsibility for validating a discredited source. Hell, you don't even know the name of the source.
Just another petty, partisan hack with too much time on his hands.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..White House, DOD Dismiss Asia Trip’s Rumored Price Tag
by Erin Vogel | November 04, 2010
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed reports by Press Trust of India that President Barack Obama's trip to Mumbai and Indonesia would cost the U.S. $200 million per day.
During Thursday's briefing, Gibbs stated that this report was "simply not true."
While Gibbs maintained that he would not go into the actual figure of what it costs to move the president from one country to another, he did state the costs are no more then what it took to travel former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush.
PTI released the article on the president's trip on Tuesday and made additional claims that roughly "3,000 people including Secret Service agents, US government officials and journalists would accompany the President."
White House spokesperson Tommy Vietor said, "The numbers reported in this article have no basis in reality."
Vietor remarked that due to security reasons he could not get into trip details but added the "numbers are wildly inflated."
In another article PTI published Thursday, the report declared the President would "be protected by a fleet of 34 warships."
Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell was quick to dispel these accusations during Thursday's briefing.
"I will take the liberty this time of dismissing as absolutely absurd this notion that somehow we are deploying ten percent of the Navy, some 34 ships, and an aircraft carrier in support of the president's trip to Asia -- that's just comical. Nothing close to that is being done."
In a statement also disregarding the PTI projections, Gordon Johndroe, former deputy White House spokesperson under President George W. Bush said, "I am positive there will not be '34 warships' involved in this trip."
Both Morrell and Gibbs reminded the press during their briefings that while the projected trip costs were inaccurate, Mumbai was once a target of terrorist organizations. The secretaries were referring to the November 26, 2009 attack that took place at Taj Mahal hotel, the same hotel President Obama is scheduled to stay. While cost details are not being released for the President's trip this Friday, the White House has stated that they are taking all necessary precautions to keep the president protected while abroad.
Because Zip's stunted perception has determined that Obama and Gibbs have never lied, or prevaricated the facts, for their own political gain.
Look, you're the one who started this utterly preposterous thread about what would be a non-problem and a non-issue even if it were real, which it isn't, and now you're still here on the fifth page foaming and seething. That's stunted perception.
Has Zip verified your source yet?![]()
My goodness
Can we go back to 2008 and see how many threads there were about
McCain houses?
Palin Wardrobe?
Palin home remodel
etc etc
cause that WAS REAL ISSUES
whereas, in teh midst of an economic calamity spending $200 million, even for an entire trip is a non issue
PATHETIC HIPPO CREEPS
You won't find more than a handful, unless you count the ones you started.My goodness
Can we go back to 2008 and see how many threads there were about
McCain houses?
Palin Wardrobe?
Palin home remodel
etc etc
cause that WAS REAL ISSUES
whereas, in teh midst of an economic calamity spending $200 million, even for an entire trip is a non issue
PATHETIC HIPPO CREEPS
Why is COLROEDCUNT going?
Why is COLROEDCUNT going?
She hasn't found a good Indian fashion designer yet.![]()
KO's memory is about as long as a piss ant.
Holy shit, you'd think he was God.
US to spend $200 mn a day on Obama's Mumbai visit
Mumbai: The US would be spending a whopping $200 million (Rs. 900 crore approx) per day on President Barack Obama's visit to the city.
"The huge amount of around $200 million would be spent on security, stay and other aspects of the Presidential visit," a top official of the Maharashtra Government privy to the arrangements for the high-profile visit said.
About 3,000 people including Secret Service agents, US government officials and journalists would accompany the President. Several officials from the White House and US security agencies are already here for the past one week with helicopters, a ship and high-end security instruments.
"Except for personnel providing immediate security to the President, the US officials may not be allowed to carry weapons. The state police is competent to take care of the security measures and they would be piloting the Presidential convoy," the official said on condition of anonymity.
Navy and Air Force has been asked by the state government to intensify patrolling along the Mumbai coastline and its airspace during Obama's stay. The city's airspace will be closed half-an-hour before the President's arrival for all aircraft barring those carrying the US delegation.
The personnel from SRPF, Force One, besides the NSG contingent stationed here would be roped in for the President's security, the official said.
The area from Hotel Taj, where Obama and his wife Michelle would stay, to Shikra helipad in Colaba would be cordoned off completely during the movement of the President.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/us-to-spend-200-mn-a-day-on-obama-s-mumbai-visit-64106
Look, you're the one who started this utterly preposterous thread about what would be a non-problem and a non-issue even if it were real, which it isn't, and now you're still here on the fifth page foaming and seething. That's stunted perception.
You fucking ding dongs spent 8 years posting unsubstantiated bullshit about Bush without even a media article to back it up, so keep your sanctimonious crap to yourself. So when will Obama refute those charges with the true costs?