Joeybagadonuts
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Posts
- 9,202
Make no mistake about it: The victory Ed Forchion — the NJWEEDMAN — enjoyed on Thursday in the Burlington County Courthouse certainly sets the stage for other marijuana users to upend the unjust New Jersey (and national) marijuana laws.
I’ll get to the “unjust” part later, but first, a rehash (pun intended) of the facts: Forchion was pulled over with a pound of pot in his car and $2,000 in cash. According to the state laws, he was facing a mandatory minimum of three years in jail and a $25,000 fine for distribution. Forchion, who has been fighting the marijuana laws in this state (and nation) for over 15 years, claimed it was for his own purposes. Medicinal, to be clear. The county prosecutor pointed out during the trial that Forchion had enough grass to roll 6,000 joints, which would seem to poke a hole in the “personal use” defense. I mean, how many joints could Forchion smoke in a day? Two? Five? Ten? (Actually, I don’t want to know.)
Forchion was seeking a hung jury, hoping to get a pothead-friendly juror to “nullify” the law. (Quick and dirty “jury nullification” definition: The jury decides the law is unjust, so they acquit.)
But what Forchion got was something much more than one person fighting for him. He got 12. A unanimous jury verdict, 12-0.
“Two of the jurors talked to me,” Forchion said in a Facebook message. “They rejected the state’s case, the state’s law and agreed with me about the flawed marijuana laws.”
So at least two jurors were on board with Forchion, and the other 10 either saw it his way, or, at the very least, didn’t think the prosecution proved its case. Either way it was, quite frankly, a giant middle finger to the state’s marijuana laws, and quite possibly a soon-to-be textbook example of how to beat those same laws.
Make no mistake: This case will be noted.
I’ll get to the “unjust” part later, but first, a rehash (pun intended) of the facts: Forchion was pulled over with a pound of pot in his car and $2,000 in cash. According to the state laws, he was facing a mandatory minimum of three years in jail and a $25,000 fine for distribution. Forchion, who has been fighting the marijuana laws in this state (and nation) for over 15 years, claimed it was for his own purposes. Medicinal, to be clear. The county prosecutor pointed out during the trial that Forchion had enough grass to roll 6,000 joints, which would seem to poke a hole in the “personal use” defense. I mean, how many joints could Forchion smoke in a day? Two? Five? Ten? (Actually, I don’t want to know.)
Forchion was seeking a hung jury, hoping to get a pothead-friendly juror to “nullify” the law. (Quick and dirty “jury nullification” definition: The jury decides the law is unjust, so they acquit.)
But what Forchion got was something much more than one person fighting for him. He got 12. A unanimous jury verdict, 12-0.
“Two of the jurors talked to me,” Forchion said in a Facebook message. “They rejected the state’s case, the state’s law and agreed with me about the flawed marijuana laws.”
So at least two jurors were on board with Forchion, and the other 10 either saw it his way, or, at the very least, didn’t think the prosecution proved its case. Either way it was, quite frankly, a giant middle finger to the state’s marijuana laws, and quite possibly a soon-to-be textbook example of how to beat those same laws.
Make no mistake: This case will be noted.
