The unconstitutional President Obama

[sufisaint]

http://news.yahoo.com/court-says-obama-recess-appointments-invalid-164811301.html

The constitution means what Obama say it means...well not yet... until his affirmative action Supreme Court appointees are told to say what it means.

 

[koalabear]

but....but......but.....he's appealing the decision.

 

[cjh]

http://news.yahoo.com/court-says-obama-recess-appointments-invalid-164811301.html

The constitution means what Obama say it means...well not yet... until his affirmative action Supreme Court appointees are told to say what it means.

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

 

[sufisaint]

but....but......but.....he's appealing the decision.

Well, maybe some old out of touch Supreme Court Justices will have chemically induced heart attacks soon.

 

[sufisaint]

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

Probably like the assholes Bush and Clinton?

 

[cjh]

Probably like the assholes Bush and Clinton?

absolutely.

 

[sufisaint]

absolutely.

They all suck past Teddy Roosevelt,except Reagan when he was not senile...and even then he did some questionable shit.

 

[Dazzle1]

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

It was not a recess appointment.
Obama ignored the law

If it hurts Unions that is good for the country.

 

[Busybody]

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

where they also

TOLD BY A COURT

that it was ILLEGAL?

 

[ImNIndy]

I support your post. Thanks for your public voice.

 

[aqwertyuiop]

It was a rare unanimous decision, too.

And, it could mean that every decision and ruling the NLRB has made since the illegal appointments are now also illegal.

The scumbag was a constiutional law lecturer?

 

[LadyVer]

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

And the only president to be considered unconstitutional? There's research I'm sure which compares how constitutional the presidents have been, from both parties.

 

[sigh]

i wonder whether he is the only president to have used recess appointments.

Here's an article on that, and it even contains this nifty chart for the slow readers:

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/01/chart-day-presidential-recess-appointments

For the record, I'm glad the court voted this way. It's time Washington got back to playing by the rules. This bullshit is another example of partisan politics gone berserk.

 

[sigh]

It was a rare unanimous decision, too.

And, it could mean that every decision and ruling the NLRB has made since the illegal appointments are now also illegal.

The scumbag was a constiutional law lecturer?

All three were Republican appointees. Our courts too are driven by politics.

It is interesting that all decisions by the NLRB since the appointment of Cordray may be undone. What a mess that will stir.

 

[KRCummings]

Is there a President who hasn't tried to do something unconstitutional?

 

[Wrong Element]

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the Senate refuses to vote on his nominees? I'm not even talking about a vote not to confirm; this is no vote, period.

 

[JohnnySavage]

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the Senate refuses to vote on his nominees? I'm not even talking about a vote not to confirm; this is no vote, period.

I've often wondered about 'advice and consent."

As far as I know, the court has never defined what happens if the Senate refuses to consent. One would assume that 'consent' would be dependent on an actual vote by the Senate.

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

thanks for sharing

 

[sigh]

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the Senate refuses to vote on his nominees? I'm not even talking about a vote not to confirm; this is no vote, period.

That's a great question, at the very heart of the problem.

 

[Liar]

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the Senate refuses to vote on his nominees? I'm not even talking about a vote not to confirm; this is no vote, period.

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the House pass deficit growing legislation and then refuse to raise the debt limit?

Both cases are examples of that branch of government being corrupted by it's own archaic cancer.

 

[Busybody]

Does the Constitution say anything about what the executive is supposed to do when the Senate refuses to vote on his nominees? I'm not even talking about a vote not to confirm; this is no vote, period.

Another NIGGER that was asleep 2001-2008, when DOZENS upon DOZENS of Bush nominees NEVER got a hearing

 

[JohnnySavage]

Another NIGGER that was asleep 2001-2008, when DOZENS upon DOZENS of Bush nominees NEVER got a hearing

Two wrongs don't make a right

 

[Busybody]

Two wrongs don't make a right

I was responding to NIGGER ELEMENT, who pretended that THIS is SOMETHING NEW

 

[JohnnySavage]

I was responding to NIGGER ELEMENT, who pretended that THIS is SOMETHING NEW

I know.

I just like to insert clever commentary on occasion.

 

[Wrong Element]

Oh, was someone speaking to me? I'm sorry, I didn't hear anything.