The toll of tranny is infinitely greater, than any price paid for freedom.

[Guest]

The toll of an expanding, threatening, and belligerent tranny, paid for over time, in many human lives – is far, far greater, than any lives spent in the eradication of such a tranny.

Even if you may be predisposed to believe that the US itself is also a tranny… even if that may, depending upon personal interpretation of issues and ones unique mindset, even then…

Which tranny would you choose to live under? Which tranny would you want any of your fellow man to live under?

Which evil would you choose – the lesser? Or the more?

I think this is a no brainer.

Now – somebody, anybody – please… make a point with fact and logic that, in the case of Iraq and it’s current leader – that he is the lesser of ‘any’ evil?

 

[inquire within]

 

[inquire within]

 

[inquire within]

 

[inquire within]

 

[weed]

The toll of an expanding, threatening, and belligerent tranny, paid for over time, in many human lives – is far, far greater, than any lives spent in the eradication of such a tranny.

Even if you may be predisposed to believe that the US itself is also a tranny… even if that may, depending upon personal interpretation of issues and ones unique mindset, even then…

Which tranny would you choose to live under? Which tranny would you want any of your fellow man to live under?

Which evil would you choose – the lesser? Or the more?

I think this is a no brainer.

Now – somebody, anybody – please… make a point with fact and logic that, in the case of Iraq and it’s current leader – that he is the lesser of ‘any’ evil?

Can't say the pics here do much for me but I sure like your post.

 

[Nogard]

Where I come from, a tranny is a nickname for an automobile transmission. Hell no I wouldn't live under one. That sucker might fall and hurt someone

 

[LovetoGiveRoses]

The Friday Times just arrived (UK)

Headline:

Labour mutiny leaves Blair out on a limb
By Philip Webster, Political Editor

Case for Iraq war rejected in biggest-ever government rebellion


A MASS mutiny by more than 120 Labour MPs over war with Iraq left Tony Blair facing a perilous moment in his premiership last night.

The rebels were among 199 MPs — almost a third of the Commons — who voted against early military action to disarm President Saddam Hussein. It was the biggest revolt against any governing party in parliamentary history and it served notice on the Prime Minister that he will have to win a second UN resolution to avoid his future being called into question.

Amid dramatic scenes in the Commons, 121 Labour rebels joined 13 Conservatives and 52 Liberal Democrats to vote for an amendment declaring that the case for military action had not yet been made.

The rebel amendment was defeated by 393 votes to 199, a majority of 194. The government motion backing its UN efforts to disarm Saddam was passed by 434 votes to 124. On that the revolt fell to 59 MPs.

Despite last-minute arm-twisting by the whips and pledges by Jack Straw and Mr Blair that MPs would have another opportunity to debate war, the Labour revolt dwarfed the worst of the last Parliament — on lone parents and disability benefit.

Even more worrying for Mr Blair were the private warnings from dozens of Labour MPs who remained loyal yesterday that they would be unable to support him if he sought to go to war without UN authority. In those circumstances Mr Blair would probably need Tory MPs’ support to secure Parliament’s backing for military action.