The Six Words That Will Seduce Any Woman

rgraham666 said:
So what happens to a guy like me who had all hope of any of those things beaten out of me at a young age?
You find someone who wants to share what you each have to give, rg. If there were a right way to do that, the divorce rate wouldn't hover at 50%.
 
Tatelou said:
But, on a more serious note, Box: Your quote of mine, way above in the thread somewhere, I did not believe I was speaking for all women at the time, merely myself.
Good news, Lou. I just heard from the licensing board. Your certification came through so now you do speak for all women. I can't tell you what a relief it is to share that responsibility with someone else.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
Almost any hetero woman who wants to can have all the sex she wants. She may not find exactly what she wants and maybe not with the kind of man that she wants, but she can have multiple partners every day.
I don't think most women would be surprised to learn that we could have multiple sex partners if we reduced our standards to whoever happens to be in the bus station at 3 a.m. What's your point, dear?
Men, and I mean adults, do not put women down for being promiscuous.
This must be fairly recent. Virginity as a qualification for marriage isn't entirely out of style; in some cultures she can be stoned to death for disappointing her man on their wedding night. Speaking strictly of western culture, didn't princess-to-be Diana have to visit the gynocologist to prove she was Prince-worthy? That was, what, a couple of decades ago? Is the whole double-standard thing over with? Or do you mean, "Men do not mind having sex with women who are promiscuous"? We knew that, too.

Everyone, male and female, who has the basic equipment and isn't in solitary confinement, can find someone to have sex with. Do we agree on that?

"Sister Mary Agnes, I've been hearing some troubling talk from young women in the parish. I'm embarrassed to admit I don't know this, but...What's a 'blow job'?"

"Six bucks, Father. Same as downtown."
 
rgraham666 said:
So what happens to a guy like me who had all hope of any of those things beaten out of me at a young age?

I don't know your circumstances, rg, and I'm not sure I understand what you mean, so I don't think I can really answer.

My point is that a desire for a man who is financially stable does not automatically equate to being a gold digger. Financial stability is important to me because I grew up in a home where money was very, very tight. I worked to achieve my own comfort level so that I would feel secure. I couldn't see myself with anyone who didn't share that goal, among several, with me. We wouldn't be right for each other in that respect.

But those are my needs, today. That doesn't mean they are every woman's needs. And it doesn't mean my needs won't change as I get older. I used to want more, but as I get older I see that I need less.

A woman who's right for you may be in a completely different head space than I. Her needs will match yours, or will complement them.
 
shereads said:
didn't princess-to-be Diana have to visit the gynocologist to prove she was Prince-worthy? [/i]

If you mean was she still wholly intact, quite apart from tampons and auto relief, without the hymen how could they tell?

Besides which 'intacta', I believe is thoroughly discouraged, why do you think they're all equestriennes? Because they like horses?
 
gauchecritic said:
If you mean was she still wholly intact, quite apart from tampons and auto relief, without the hymen how could they tell?

Besides which 'intacta', I believe is thoroughly discouraged, why do you think they're all equestriennes? Because they like horses?

It's your country. I only know what I read, and only what's on the cover. I don't buy those rags.

Maybe the gyn visit was a formality, to placate traditionalists. Or make the French jealous that Britain has virgins.
 
rgraham666 said:
So what happens to a guy like me who had all hope of any of those things beaten out of me at a young age?

You end up writing smut for Literotica.:D
 
Boxlicker101 said:
You end up writing smut for Literotica.:D

Uhm, works for me.

Seriously, LadyJeanne, due to the personality I have, it's doubtful I'll ever be able to offer 'financial stability'.

And if I became 'financially stable', I would probably start distrusting the women I did meet. I would think "Where were you when I was poor? I haven't changed. It must be my money you're interested in. Bye."

I'm going to stop visiting this thread. It's depressing the living fuck out of me.
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Boxlicker101

Almost any hetero woman who wants to can have all the sex she wants. She may not find exactly what she wants and maybe not with the kind of man that she wants, but she can have multiple partners every day.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sher responded:

I don't think most women would be surprised to learn that we could have multiple sex partners if we reduced our standards to whoever happens to be in the bus station at 3 a.m. What's your point, dear

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That is part of a paragraph in a post that was in response to a post by sub joe. He mentioned a female acquaintance who had a series of studly young boyfriends. I commented that almost any woman could do the same thing. It is not related with what we have been discussing and your standards would not have to be as low as what you are implying.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Boxlicker101

Men, and I mean adults, do not put women down for being promiscuous.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sher responded:

This must be fairly recent. Virginity as a qualification for marriage isn't entirely out of style; in some cultures she can be stoned to death for disappointing her man on their wedding night. Speaking strictly of western culture, didn't princess-to-be Diana have to visit the gynocologist to prove she was Prince-worthy? That was, what, a couple of decades ago? Is the whole double-standard thing over with? Or do you mean, "Men do not mind having sex with women who are promiscuous"? We knew that, too.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am actually referring to the US, where women are not stoned for not being virgins. There may be some small areas, such as ultra-religious communities where they might be shunned or otherwise ostracized but those would be isolated areas and the women can always leave those areas if they don't like it there.

I don't believe there has been much of a double standard, at least not among adults during our lifetimes. There are a few persons who believe that both the bride and groom should be virgins on their wedding night but too few to call that attitude a "style". I have never heard or read anything by men criticizing any woman for being promiscous, although other women often complain. Most men figure it is none of their business or else they try to get some of the action.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sher Also said:
Everyone, male and female, who has the basic equipment and isn't in solitary confinement, can find someone to have sex with. Do we agree on that?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have to agree with you there. I used to take trips occasionally to Reno and I would pay a visit to the Mustang Ranch while I was there. In between these trips, I used to answer the adds of prostitutes in sleazy magazines. I have always been envious of women because of the varied sex lives they are able to so easily have.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I don't believe there has been much of a double standard, at least not among adults during our lifetimes.

There's been one in my lifetime. I'm glad yours is different.

I remember a post about racism by one of those wacko survivalists who comes through here now and again. This one stated that racism hardly exists anymore, and would disappear altogether if black people would stop talking about it.

Was he black or white, I wonder? It's easier to see bigotry when it's happening to you. Could that account for the lack of a sexual double standard where you live?

If it was gone, it must be coming back:

Just the other night on that NBC program about kids and sex, boys admitted that they had lower opinions of girls who'd had multiple partners. They didn't mind having sex with those girls, though. Where might they pick up those attitudes if their dads are so enlightened?

Edited to add: It must be the moms.

:rolleyes:
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I am actually referring to the US, where women are not stoned for not being virgins.
What about girls who aren't virgins because they were stoned?

:D
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Boxlicker101

I don't believe there has been much of a double standard, at least not among adults during our lifetimes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

shereads said:
There's been one in my lifetime. I'm glad yours is different.

I remember a post about racism by one of those wacko survivalists who comes through here now and again. This one stated that racism hardly exists anymore, and would disappear altogether if black people would stop talking about it.

Was he black or white, I wonder? It's easier to see bigotry when it's happening to you. Could that account for the lack of a sexual double standard where you live?

If it was gone, it must be coming back:

Just the other night on that NBC program about kids and sex, boys admitted that they had lower opinions of girls who'd had multiple partners. They didn't mind having sex with those girls, though. Where might they pick up those attitudes if their dads are so enlightened?

Edited to add: It must be the moms.

:rolleyes:

In the fifties, when I was a teenager, boys would sometimes speak disparagingly about girls who were considered to be "easy". I never did because I never had negative thoughts about them and hoped I could be one of the crowd they were "easy" with. Anyhow, that's why I specified "adults".

I'm aware that racism exists but sometimes people are so sensitive that they see it where it doesn't exist. If a person were to refer to one of a group of men as "That black man over there", there are those who see that as racism, when all the person would be doing would be describing the man he meant. If he had said "that tall man over there," would he be a heightist.

Sexism exists too, but it comes in all genders. How often do you say or hear someone else say something like "Men are all alike" or "Men can't make commitments" or "Men never ask directions" or "Men are such pigs" or any other comment such as that. Last night there was one of the most sexist movies in history on TV, "Waiting to Exhale". If a movie were ever to be made that was so negative about women, there would be cries of outrage and pickets in front of any theater that showed it.

The NBC program you mentioned referred to boys and girls, while I am referring to men and women. Even so, did they ask any of the girls what they thought of boys who dated a lot of girls? They probably would have gotten similar responses.

You edited to add: "It must be the moms." You may have been being facetious but it probably would have been. Women are much more sensitive about such circumstances that men are. As I have said many times, whatever double standard exists, it's women who are keeping it alive.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Boxlicker101

I am actually referring to the US, where women are not stoned for not being virgins.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What about girls who aren't virgins because they were stoned?

If they were deflowered while they were stoned, they can probably claim they were raped.

By the way, when we refer to "the double standard" we usually mean what we have just been posting about but other ones exist. One of them is this: If a woman has sex with a man while she has been drinking and later regrets it, she can claim she was raped and the guy will very likely be convicted, even though she was capable of taking care of herself. If a man were to have sex with a woman while drunk and later regret it, he would be laughed out of court if he claimed he had been raped.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I'm aware that racism exists but sometimes people are so sensitive that they see it where it doesn't exist. If a person were to refer to one of a group of men as "That black man over there", there are those who see that as racism, when all the person would be doing would be describing the man he meant.
You're right, and don't that just beat all? I have to go make Billy-Bob some eggs or he'll break my other arm. Say Hi to everybody there in Pleasantville.
If a man were to have sex with a woman while drunk and later regret it, he would be laughed out of court if he claimed he had been raped.
I wish! The way he was hollerin' when the judge suspended my sentence, you couldn't have heard anybody laugh if they was.
 
Six words to seduce a majority of women:

I thought only five were needed.

Nice shoes... want to fuck?

ElSol
 
The trouble with "fuck me" shoes, is that that's what they want to make me do. Fuck them. Just love those stilleto heels.
 
It's not six and might only work on epicene equines, but I quite liked "let me whisper in your ear and persuade you to let me be one with you."

Maybe it was in the delivery. ;)

Shanglan
 
BlackShanglan said:
It's not six and might only work on epicene equines, but I quite liked "let me whisper in your ear and persuade you to let me be one with you."

Maybe it was in the delivery. ;)

Shanglan

See, that's the kind of line that I would have all ready to go and then stumble over on delivery and make an ass* of myself. :rolleyes:



*the non-equine kind
 
With men, a simple, "Hi, sailor," usually does the trick. Nine out of ten times, anyway.
 
perdita said:
O gawd, baby, no! I don't want to be one with anything. I'd be out the door.


I suppose that's the proof that nothing works on everyone. That's the part I liked best. ;)

Shanglan
 
minsue said:
Nope, that's the kind of line that sets off the smarm alarms in my head.

Yeah, they all sound kinda smarmy, don't they? We melt nonetheless.

:cool:


(naughty horsey!)
 
minsue said:
Nope, that's the kind of line that sets off the smarm alarms in my head.
Yeah.

Yes, the smarm-alarm is important; to those of us who are allergic, it can be life-saving. But our aversion to overt sentimentality can backfire when we meet someone with no capacity for smarm, and feel challenged to make him a teensy bit smarmy...

:rolleyes:

The clincher line that hooked me into a 12-year relationship with the antichrist of sentiment was this:

"So you're married...and you live far away." (heavy sigh) "I can't tell you how attractive I find that in a woman."

:D

Oh, ha ha. What a kidder he was. Not.
 
Back
Top