Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
QuickDuck said:As weird as it might sound, I think its pretty much accepted that Atlantis exsisted in some form.
\Grrrr...thanks, man, this is exactly what I was talking about.Ishmael said:Immanuel Velikovsky did some of the most extensive studies of ancient texts as historically accurate documents. His conclusion was that the events described did occur, but that the ancients distorted the events and wrapped the facts with otherworldly or mystical interpretations.
There is mounting evidence that the Straits of Bosphorus were closed in ancient times and what is now the Black Sea was a huge basin well below sea level. Much like the United States Death Valley is today.
Erosion or perhaps an earthquake caused a rupture in the neck of land that now is the Straits of Bosphorus allowing the Mediterranean to flood the basin that is now the Black Sea. The indications are that this was a catastrophic event.
Now that has nothing to do with Noah's Ark and it's improbable that the back wave ever reached Mt. Ararat. But that is a flood of Biblical proportions that would surely be remembered for centuries. And the effects would be generally noted throughout the Mediterranean area.
Ishmael
watergirl said:another good one.
Somehow, mysteries of our own planet are so much more interesting to me than all the goofy space alien things.
Anyone else read Voyage of the Kon-tiki?
Great great book.
Thor Heyerdahl was an amazing adventurer but his whole Kon-tiki theory has never held water (kind of like his reed boat!). It was his swan song but he was bitter that when subsequent researchers took up the challenge, they disproved him on most points.Lancecastor said:Was that the Thor Hyerdhal deal with the reed boat? Yeah!
I saw the movie when it first came out ten million years ago.
"allegedly" participated in trans-Atlantic voyages.Lancecastor said:Some refugee Knights (and their treasure?) were welcomed by the powerful St Clairs of Scotland, and under Prince Henry Sinclair, participated in trans Atlantic voyages that resulted in a settlement in Nova Scotia in 1398.
Coolville said:"allegedly" participated in trans-Atlantic voyages.
There are tales about Irish munks heading west, too.
So far, the only proof is that the Vikings made it - around 1000 AD. There's a national park in Canada where they settled.
They would have spread the word about this land to the west and others would have made the dash, but sadly no proof exists.
Re. the vikings, Farley Mowatt's book West Viking is fascinating.
Fair enough on point 1, but you mentioned 1378 as the date. which was what I was taking issue with.Lancecastor said:The Scottish Stuart kings had a castle on the highest point on the mainland of the province of Nova Scotia during the time they were allied with the French against the Brits in carving up the New World.
~~~~~~
The presence of a Norse longhouse sized foundation and tips of broadswords carbon-dated to Viking times in fire pits on that same hill is further proof that the Vikings, nomadic, seasonal people that they were, had camps not only in Newfoundland but in Nova Scotia as well. Some evidence suggests they roamed as far south as Virginia.
Coolville said:Fair enough on point 1, but you mentioned 1378 as the date. which was what I was taking issue with.
There is little doubt the Vikings made it farther south, but proof has been lacking. Got a link to the Nova Scotia site?
Editing to add: Nomadic, seasonal people... the vikings? That would be incorrect. The Vikings were settlers primarily. When they moved into Britain, they set up towns and markets and trading posts. In Greenland, they ventured out hunting, but maintained permanent settlements.
No nomad action.
(not an agressive "Got a link!!??" accusation, but rather a "I'm interested" got a link... Capite?![]()
Coolville said:Fair enough on point 1, but you mentioned 1378 as the date. which was what I was taking issue with.
Lancecastor said:Noah was instructed by God to save his family and the world's animals during a great flood that would cover the Earth. To do so, Noah built a large vessel, an ark. What followed was a pouring rain lasting 40 days and 40 nights. According to the Book of Genesis, as the Great Flood receded, the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat.
1949 Photo
http://www.space.com/images/1949-f6_BIGAD.jpg
Aircraft imagery of Mount Ararat taken in June of that year and analyzed by U.S. intelligence officials includes a unique feature at the 15,500-foot level on the Northwestern Plateau. Then in 1973 and 1976, through the lenses of classified satellites, this "whatever-it-is" also purportedly stirred up the same community.
"It's called the 'Ararat Anomaly'," said Porcher Taylor, an assistant professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia, and an expert in satellite imaging diplomacy and the news media. He has been gathering evidence on the novel feature since 1993, including a set of those 1949 aerial shots of the area, now declassified.
Taylor said that arguments have erupted within intelligence circles for decades as to what truly has been seen on Mount Ararat.
"Debates center on whether or not it's a strange rock formation, a crashed airplane, perhaps a fortress or some other structure hundreds of years old … or maybe something more interesting of potentially biblical proportions," Taylor told SPACE.com. Certain individuals in the know, he added, believe what is visible in certain satellite pictures is the bow of a ship sticking out of a glacier.
http://www******.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/noahs_ark_010823-1.html