The Question Is, Will AOC Follow Suit?

Insurance companies believe in climate change.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/au/home-insurance/aussie-homes-uninsurable/

“Meanwhile, new data from the CSIRO’s once-in-a-decade megatrends report reveals that the cost of natural disasters is expected to triple over the next 30 years as climate change worsens.”



https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/business/retirement-climate-change-homeowners-insurance.html

Extreme Weather and Rising Insurance Rates Squeeze Retirees​


“I can definitely say that for my Florida clients, it’s a topic of conversation and it’s on their radar,” said Mr. Diton, president of the Wealth Alliance, an investment advisory firm. “They’re seeing that their cost of insurance is rising.”


“In some regions, we already see changing weather patterns, most likely driven by climate change, already having an impact,” said Ernst Rauch, chief climate and geoscientist at the reinsurance company Munich Re.
 
Insurance companies believe in climate change.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/au/home-insurance/aussie-homes-uninsurable/

“Meanwhile, new data from the CSIRO’s once-in-a-decade megatrends report reveals that the cost of natural disasters is expected to triple over the next 30 years as climate change worsens.”



https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/business/retirement-climate-change-homeowners-insurance.html

Extreme Weather and Rising Insurance Rates Squeeze Retirees​


“I can definitely say that for my Florida clients, it’s a topic of conversation and it’s on their radar,” said Mr. Diton, president of the Wealth Alliance, an investment advisory firm. “They’re seeing that their cost of insurance is rising.”


“In some regions, we already see changing weather patterns, most likely driven by climate change, already having an impact,” said Ernst Rauch, chief climate and geoscientist at the reinsurance company Munich Re.
Going back at least two billion years there have been about 5 ice ages. Changing weather patterns are a fact of life that you or anyone else can't do a damn thing about, except create a new Church of Climate Change with an international ecumenical council of billionaires to run it.
 
Going back at least two billion years there have been about 5 ice ages. Changing weather patterns are a fact of life that you or anyone else can't do a damn thing about, except create a new Church of Climate Change with an international ecumenical council of billionaires to run it.
Yes, everyone knows you deny climate change science.
 
Insurance companies believe in climate change.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/au/home-insurance/aussie-homes-uninsurable/

“Meanwhile, new data from the CSIRO’s once-in-a-decade megatrends report reveals that the cost of natural disasters is expected to triple over the next 30 years as climate change worsens.”



https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/business/retirement-climate-change-homeowners-insurance.html

Extreme Weather and Rising Insurance Rates Squeeze Retirees​


“I can definitely say that for my Florida clients, it’s a topic of conversation and it’s on their radar,” said Mr. Diton, president of the Wealth Alliance, an investment advisory firm. “They’re seeing that their cost of insurance is rising.”


“In some regions, we already see changing weather patterns, most likely driven by climate change, already having an impact,” said Ernst Rauch, chief climate and geoscientist at the reinsurance company Munich Re.

All that does is prove that insurance companies are expert at finding ways to deny coverage and raise premiums, not that climate change actually exists.
 
Going back at least two billion years there have been about 5 ice ages. Changing weather patterns are a fact of life that you or anyone else can't do a damn thing about, except create a new Church of Climate Change with an international ecumenical council of billionaires to run it.
Yeah and they hold no pattern whatsoever and what we have now is brand new. Weather patterns generally are gradual not this bullshit.
Oh and you ask how a top ten for over a century is unusual. Did you think that out?
 
https://i-download.imgflip.com/7f8554.gif
You might not personally believe that profit is what motivates government's and industry's denial of the dangers of fossil fuels. I get that.

But by pretending to not even be aware that the primary argument against doing anything about it is "it's bad for profits", you have got to be just playing dumb.

Unless you're in the Tim Walberg camp, who say we shouldn't do anything about climate change because for one thing it's God's will and for another thing if it becomes a problem He'll take care of it.

This would explain the complete disconnection from the rest of the conversation - both sides of it.
I'm in the camp that says, there is no "climate change" that is out of the ordinary in the Earth's historical cycle. You want to believe the world is going to end in the next few years because of something man is doing to the Earth, which is infantile in the extreme. The left, leveraging this nonsense for the last 50 years in order to establish a centralized international governing authority to oversee every aspect of our lives, has presented nothing but one embarrassing failure of alleged scientific forecast after another. All of which can be easily described as nothing more than a voluminous chronicle of soothsaying predictions of doom:

1. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
2. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
3. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
4. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
5. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
6. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
7. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
8. 1974: Another Ice Age?
9. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life (data and graph)
10. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
11. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes (additional link)
12. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend (additional link)
13. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
14. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
15. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
16. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
17. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
18. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015 (additional link)
27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
28. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
29. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
30. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
31. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
32. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 1990s
33. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
34. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
35. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
36. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
37. 2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
38. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
39. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
40. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
41. 1970s: Killer Bees!
 
https://i-download.imgflip.com/7f8554.gif
You might not personally believe that profit is what motivates government's and industry's denial of the dangers of fossil fuels. I get that.

But by pretending to not even be aware that the primary argument against doing anything about it is "it's bad for profits", you have got to be just playing dumb.

Unless you're in the Tim Walberg camp, who say we shouldn't do anything about climate change because for one thing it's God's will and for another thing if it becomes a problem He'll take care of it.

This would explain the complete disconnection from the rest of the conversation - both sides of it.
And a few more:

42. 1975: The Cooling World and a Drastic Decline in Food Production
43. 1969: Worldwide Plague, Overwhelming Pollution, Ecological Catastrophe, Virtual Collapse of UK by End of 20th Century
44. 1972: Pending Depletion and Shortages of Gold, Tin, Oil, Natural Gas, Copper, Aluminum
45. 1970: Oceans Dead in a Decade, US Water Rationing by 1974, Food Rationing by 1980
46. 1988: World’s Leading Climate Expert Predicts Lower Manhattan Underwater by 2018
47. 2005: Fifty Million Climate Refugees by the Year 2020
48. 2000: Snowfalls Are Now a Thing of the Past
49.1989: UN Warns That Entire Nations Wiped Off the Face of the Earth by 2000 From Global Warming
50. 2011: Washington Post Predicted Cherry Blossoms Blooming in Winter
 
As crazy as the Republicans are being, it's really tame to be talking about AOC at all.
 
Yeah and they hold no pattern whatsoever and what we have now is brand new. Weather patterns generally are gradual not this bullshit.
Oh and you ask how a top ten for over a century is unusual. Did you think that out?
History didn't begin the day you were born.
 
“Right”guide, went through all the trouble of fetching random articles that lacked any consensus from the scientific community.

Good dog “Right”guide!!!

Dumb dog,…..but - Good dog!!!

👉 “Right”guide 🤣

🇺🇸
 
I think this thread is illustrative of the empirical need for the Left to wrap their dreams of a return to some imaginary idyllic state where life was harmonious and the world was pristine and clean that they would use an uneducated Joan d'Arc preaching the word of Gaia to supplant and overcome the actual rigors of scientific inquiry in order to enforce their will upon everyone else.

Force Before Eloquence
 
I think this thread is illustrative of the empirical need for the Left to wrap their dreams of a return to some imaginary idyllic state where life was harmonious and the world was pristine and clean that they would use an uneducated Joan d'Arc preaching the word of Gaia to supplant and overcome the actual rigors of scientific inquiry in order to enforce their will upon everyone else.

Force Before Eloquence
Did you have your MAGA hat on when you wrote that?
 
I think this thread is illustrative of the empirical need for the Left to wrap their dreams of a return to some imaginary idyllic state where life was harmonious and the world was pristine and clean that they would use an uneducated Joan d'Arc preaching the word of Gaia to supplant and overcome the actual rigors of scientific inquiry in order to enforce their will upon everyone else.

Force Before Eloquence

I think what the stupid climate change idiots don't understand is that if we did return to the days where man didn't have modern conveniences, those self same stupid climate change idiots wouldn't survive in the new world they clamored for.
 
I think what the stupid climate change idiots don't understand is that if we did return to the days where man didn't have modern conveniences, those self same stupid climate change idiots wouldn't survive in the new world they clamored for.
Back to the good old days when rivers could catch fire.

:nods:
 
When making fire was the product of flint and steel.

Why would you need fire? You're supposed to huddle in the hut in the warmth provided to you from the green masters and only eat grass and bugs. You don't need fire for those things and fire is too dangerous for us plebes anyway.
 
Why would you need fire? You're supposed to huddle in the hut in the warmth provided to you from the green masters and only eat grass and bugs. You don't need fire for those things and fire is too dangerous for us plebes anyway.
How soon will they ban the bow and arrow?
 
Back
Top