The Question Is, Will AOC Follow Suit?

Leftists waddling around with baseball-sized loads drooping their diapers. Go tell mom you need to be changed.🤧
The best thing about your pouty and disgruntled old right wing man threadfails is how they all eventually devolve into you posting your barely-disguised fetish. :ROFLMAO:
 
From Wiki: Ocasio-Cortez graduated cum laude[27] from Boston University in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in both international relations and economics.
From Wiki: Lauren Boebert earned a GED certificate in 2020
From Wiki: George Santos holds a GED (Certificate of High School Equivalency),[verification required]
From your favorite source, Snopes:

"Here is the reality: Ocasio-Cortez truly graduated cum laude from Boston University in 2011. In an article about distinguished alumni, the university wrote that "Ocasio-Cortez graduated from Boston University in 2011 with a BA in International Relations and Economics."

We reached out to the university to clarify the issue: Did she earn a degree in international relations with a focus in economics? Or did she major in both international relations and economics? They indicated that the latter was true.

A spokesperson for the university told us: "She graduated in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree with two majors in International Relations and Economics. Latin Honors awarded was cum laude that is not tied to an individual major but the degree."


Which for all practical purposes is how to spend American tax money in the Third World. For all of her alleged education, she really doesn't know diddly about real economic theory or how the American economy works. She doesn't know diddly about energ, how it fuels the economy, free enterprise, or the American business sector either.
 
From your favorite source, Snopes:

"Here is the reality: Ocasio-Cortez truly graduated cum laude from Boston University in 2011. In an article about distinguished alumni, the university wrote that "Ocasio-Cortez graduated from Boston University in 2011 with a BA in International Relations and Economics."

We reached out to the university to clarify the issue: Did she earn a degree in international relations with a focus in economics? Or did she major in both international relations and economics? They indicated that the latter was true.

A spokesperson for the university told us: "She graduated in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree with two majors in International Relations and Economics. Latin Honors awarded was cum laude that is not tied to an individual major but the degree."


Which for all practical purposes is how to spend American tax money in the Third World. For all of her alleged education, she really doesn't know diddly about real economic theory or how the American economy works. She doesn't know diddly about energ, how it fuels the economy, free enterprise, or the American business sector either.
So you don't like educational institutions and somehow use that to call AOC out.

Got it 👍
 
A broken clock is right twice a day.

nobody here is blaming you for taking the only two technical wins you can get, homie. :ROFLMAO:
Your problem is your clock is running too slow, it takes a lot longer, more than 12 hours to be right again. (a little Periodic function lesson there for ya). :rolleyes: :D
 
From your favorite source, Snopes:

"Here is the reality: Ocasio-Cortez truly graduated cum laude from Boston University in 2011. In an article about distinguished alumni, the university wrote that "Ocasio-Cortez graduated from Boston University in 2011 with a BA in International Relations and Economics."

We reached out to the university to clarify the issue: Did she earn a degree in international relations with a focus in economics? Or did she major in both international relations and economics? They indicated that the latter was true.

A spokesperson for the university told us: "She graduated in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree with two majors in International Relations and Economics. Latin Honors awarded was cum laude that is not tied to an individual major but the degree."


Which for all practical purposes is how to spend American tax money in the Third World. For all of her alleged education, she really doesn't know diddly about real economic theory or how the American economy works. She doesn't know diddly about energ, how it fuels the economy, free enterprise, or the American business sector either.
Meanwhile the 'far brighter' Santos claims to have a GED equivalent but is yet to be verified. Experience tells us that it's a lie.
The Representative who spent her formative years waiting tables at Lady-Bunz passed the GED whilst being lined up for the election as the GOP could find nobody better.
 
The current storm season did not used to be normal. Besides, now you're trying to pretend that a four decade drought is normal.

You're so full of shit it's amazing that you don't melt into the grass in the rain.

Here's a chart of seasonal rainfall in Los Angeles from 1887 to 2021.

http://www.laalmanac.com/images4/chart-rainfall-LA-1887-2021.jpg



That chart shows the actual depth of your ignorance. It also disproves your entire climate change bullshit narrative. Basically, you don't know what you're talking about (as usual) AND what you are saying isn't supported by the actual data. IOW, everything you say is a bald faced lie.
 
You lie a lot. I'm right more than I am wrong on any day of the week.
51%vs.49% isn't exactly a ringing endorsement when the correct and factual info is as readily available as the lies you perpetuate here, brainiac.
 
You're so full of shit it's amazing that you don't melt into the grass in the rain.

Here's a chart of seasonal rainfall in Los Angeles from 1887 to 2021.

http://www.laalmanac.com/images4/chart-rainfall-LA-1887-2021.jpg



That chart shows the actual depth of your ignorance. It also disproves your entire climate change bullshit narrative. Basically, you don't know what you're talking about (as usual) AND what you are saying isn't supported by the actual data. IOW, everything you say is a bald faced lie.

Your chart does not support your point at all. I love that you hate science so much that you don't even bother cherry picking.
 
Lol. You can't even understand pichurs...
I can understand them just fine. Your chart shows us annual rainfall per year for more than a century. That's not what we're discussing. We're discussing these all at once storms that as specifically slamming SoCal. Your chart does not support your hypothesis, it simply does not.
 
I can understand them just fine. Your chart shows us annual rainfall per year for more than a century. That's not what we're discussing. We're discussing these all at once storms that as specifically slamming SoCal. Your chart does not support your hypothesis, it simply does not.

So, a chart which displays annual rainfall for more than a century isn't, according to you, applicable to the amount of rainfall we're having right now...


Yeah, I knew you were dum but I didn't think you were that dum.
 
No it does not. 10 inches over ten months and 10 inches over 3 are two very different things.
 
Probably a lot. I have found over the years that one thing that marks conservatives is a lack of knowledge of science and an inability to think critically. Given how many believe in God it sorta makes a lot sense. This entire year might suck.
 
dudly, I live in Ca. I can tell you that the current storm season used to be the "normal" winter cycle before the droughts that started in the mid-80's came along. If you don't believe me, check on how many times the Rose Parade was almost called off because of the possibility of rain. For those who don't have googie woogie skilz, it's like an every year question - do they have the parade or don't they? So the current rain cycle isn't unusual except that it comes after decades of drought and no one remembers what rain is.
The current storm season did not used to be normal. Besides, now you're trying to pretend that a four decade drought is normal.
You're so full of shit it's amazing that you don't melt into the grass in the rain.

Here's a chart of seasonal rainfall in Los Angeles from 1887 to 2021.

http://www.laalmanac.com/images4/chart-rainfall-LA-1887-2021.jpg



That chart shows the actual depth of your ignorance. It also disproves your entire climate change bullshit narrative. Basically, you don't know what you're talking about (as usual) AND what you are saying isn't supported by the actual data. IOW, everything you say is a bald faced lie.
Your chart does not support your point at all. I love that you hate science so much that you don't even bother cherry picking.
Lol. You can't even understand pichurs...
I can understand them just fine. Your chart shows us annual rainfall per year for more than a century. That's not what we're discussing. We're discussing these all at once storms that as specifically slamming SoCal. Your chart does not support your hypothesis, it simply does not.
So, a chart which displays annual rainfall for more than a century isn't, according to you, applicable to the amount of rainfall we're having right now...


Yeah, I knew you were dum but I didn't think you were that dum.
No it does not. 10 inches over ten months and 10 inches over 3 are two very different things.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/39zbpCQocXLi0/giphy.gif

https://y.yarn.co/37787b6d-20f8-4e93-83fe-d813808c56e9_text.gif

https://y.yarn.co/1172f2a1-440a-436b-82fe-66b58501b702_text.gif

:ROFLMAO:
 
No it does not. 10 inches over ten months and 10 inches over 3 are two very different things.
It's a chart of rainfall amounts year over year.

How is it that a chart of rainfall amounts year over year is, in your mind, not applicable to whether the amount of rainfall in this season is "normal" or not? Are you not aware that in order to compare this season's rain totals to prior years such a comparison requires that you CHART those prior years' rainfall amounts?

Are you REALLY that God damned stupid?

Then you compound that idiocy by saying that this year's high rainfall amounts don't compare to the prior 3 years of drought while ignoring the trend of rainfall amounts for the last 100+ years showing the aggregate "normal" rainfall totals to be in line with this years totals.

Yup, you apparently REALLY ARE that God Damned Stupid.
 
You're so full of shit it's amazing that you don't melt into the grass in the rain.

Here's a chart of seasonal rainfall in Los Angeles from 1887 to 2021.

http://www.laalmanac.com/images4/chart-rainfall-LA-1887-2021.jpg



That chart shows the actual depth of your ignorance. It also disproves your entire climate change bullshit narrative. Basically, you don't know what you're talking about (as usual) AND what you are saying isn't supported by the actual data. IOW, everything you say is a bald faced lie.
As I said he thinks history began the day he was born.:D
 
It's a chart of rainfall amounts year over year.

How is it that a chart of rainfall amounts year over year is, in your mind, not applicable to whether the amount of rainfall in this season is "normal" or not? Are you not aware that in order to compare this season's rain totals to prior years such a comparison requires that you CHART those prior years' rainfall amounts?

Are you REALLY that God damned stupid?

Then you compound that idiocy by saying that this year's high rainfall amounts don't compare to the prior 3 years of drought while ignoring the trend of rainfall amounts for the last 100+ years showing the aggregate "normal" rainfall totals to be in line with this years totals.

Yup, you apparently REALLY ARE that God Damned Stupid.
Exactly, its a chart of rainfall amounts year over year.

IT doesn't require charting former years, it requires charting month by month rainfall. I didn't say much about the last 3 years because its irrellevant. I get it though, you call me stupid because you hope like hell people will read that and think you're intelligent but you're common garbage I've been dealing with here for almost twenty years.
 
Back
Top