The Online World

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
Through His Webcam, a Boy Joins a Sordid Online World

By KURT EICHENWALD
Published: December 19, 2005
New York Times

The 13-year-old boy sat in his California home, eyes fixed on a computer screen. He had never run with the popular crowd and long ago had turned to the Internet for the friends he craved. But on this day, Justin Berry's fascination with cyberspace would change his life.


Weeks before, Justin had hooked up a Web camera to his computer, hoping to use it to meet other teenagers online. Instead, he heard only from men who chatted with him by instant message as they watched his image on the Internet. To Justin, they seemed just like friends, ready with compliments and always offering gifts.

Now, on an afternoon in 2000, one member of his audience sent a proposal: he would pay Justin $50 to sit bare-chested in front of his Webcam for three minutes. The man explained that Justin could receive the money instantly and helped him open an account on PayPal.com, an online payment system.

"I figured, I took off my shirt at the pool for nothing," he said recently. "So, I was kind of like, what's the difference?"
Justin removed his T-shirt. The men watching him oozed compliments.

So began the secret life of a teenager who was lured into selling images of his body on the Internet over the course of five years. From the seduction that began that day, this soccer-playing honor roll student was drawn into performing in front of the Webcam - undressing, showering, masturbating and even having sex - for an audience of more than 1,500 people who paid him, over the years, hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Justin's dark coming-of-age story is a collateral effect of recent technological advances. Minors, often under the online tutelage of adults, are opening for-pay pornography sites featuring their own images sent onto the Internet by inexpensive Webcams. And they perform from the privacy of home, while parents are nearby, beyond their children's closed bedroom doors.

The business has created youthful Internet pornography stars - with nicknames like Riotboyy, Miss Honey and Gigglez - whose images are traded online long after their sites have vanished. In this world, adolescents announce schedules of their next masturbation for customers who pay fees for the performance or monthly subscription charges. Eager customers can even buy "private shows," in which teenagers sexually perform while following real-time instructions.

A six-month investigation by The New York Times into this corner of the Internet found that such sites had emerged largely without attracting the attention of law enforcement or youth protection organizations. While experts with these groups said they had witnessed a recent deluge of illicit, self-generated Webcam images, they had not known of the evolution of sites where minors sold images of themselves for money.

"We've been aware of the use of the Webcam and its potential use by exploiters," said Ernest E. Allen, chief executive of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, a private group. "But this is a variation on a theme that we haven't seen. It's unbelievable."

Minors who run these sites find their anonymity amusing, joking that their customers may be the only adults who know of their activities. It is, in the words of one teenage site operator, the "Webcam Matrix," a reference to the movie in which a computerized world exists without the knowledge of most of humanity.

In this virtual universe, adults hunt for minors on legitimate sites used by Webcam owners who post contact information in hopes of attracting friends. If children respond to messages, adults spend time "grooming" them - with praise, attention and gifts - before seeking to persuade them to film themselves pornographically.

The lure is the prospect of easy money. Many teenagers solicit "donations," request gifts through sites like Amazon.com or negotiate payments, while a smaller number charge monthly fees. But there are other beneficiaries, including businesses, some witting and some unwitting, that provide services to the sites like Web hosting and payment processing.
[…]
The Times inquiry has already resulted in a large-scale criminal investigation. In June, The Times located Justin Berry, then 18. In interviews, Justin revealed the existence of a group of more than 1,500 men who paid for his online images, as well as evidence that other identifiable children as young as 13 were being actively exploited.

In a series of meetings, The Times persuaded Justin to abandon his business and, to protect other children at risk, assisted him in contacting the Justice Department. Arrests and indictments of adults he identified as pornography producers and traffickers began in September. Investigators are also focusing on businesses, including credit card processors that have aided illegal sites. Anyone who has created, distributed, marketed, possessed or paid to view such pornography is open to a criminal charge.
[…]
 
This is scary shit, but not all that surprising. If, when I was a teen, someone had offered me money to get naked on cam, I'd have done it without hesitation. Hell, I flashed many a person for free in those days.
 
I think it's admirable for young people to get put on their thinking caps, apply a little elbow grease and horse sense, make haste not waste, get some pep, vim, vigour, use their noggins, have a little gumption and go and learn the value of a dollar, by Golly.
 
There is no Online World.

That's what these kids don't realise. It's not a quaint little parallell universe that doesn't affect them. And the alluring anonymity is actually the opposite. Like the article says, those pictures won't go away, and can come back to bite at any time. They'll be wank icons forever.
 
well at 17 I turned down 8 grand for sex , but hell even I would have flashed titties for 50 bucks, it's a sad lure. (sigh) maybe I should be glad the internet wasn't accesable to me at the time.
 
Sub Joe said:
I think it's admirable for young people to get put on their thinking caps, apply a little elbow grease and horse sense, make haste not waste, get some pep, vim, vigour, use their noggins, have a little gumption and go and learn the value of a dollar, by Golly.

The facetiousness of my quoted post probably masked the serious point I was trying to make, to wit:

In America, The evil is Greed, not Porn. The kid wanted to make a buck. He's being a good, enterprising citizen.
 
woodnymph_O said:
well at 17 I turned down 8 grand for sex , but hell even I would have flashed titties for 50 bucks, it's a sad lure. (sigh) maybe I should be glad the internet wasn't accesable to me at the time.
But would you have flashed 'em for a photographer who'd print them in a porn zine? Because that's approx what is happening these days.
 
Liar said:
But would you have flashed 'em for a photographer who'd print them in a porn zine? Because that's approx what is happening these days.

I would have.
But then, I guess that's obvious since I've posted quite a bit of myself here on lit, and these pics are pretty much free for anyone to do what they want with em.
 
Liar said:
But would you have flashed 'em for a photographer who'd print them in a porn zine? Because that's approx what is happening these days.
thats kind of the point, How would I know if he is using photo caapture softare to save it, I would have thought it was a 5 second glance and no more (shrug) kids are dumb like that
 
Sub Joe said:
The facetiousness of my quoted post probably masked the serious point I was trying to make, to wit:

In America, The evil is Greed, not Porn. The kid wanted to make a buck. He's being a good, enterprising citizen.

Indeed. A few years back my old alma mater suffered the humiliation of having it publically revealed that the police had broken up a prostitution ring running out of one of the women's dormitories. Evidently the young ladies in question were not charity cases desperate for food or to continue thier studies; rather, they were generally upper-middle-class individuals who wanted to subsidize a continuation of the affluent lifestyle they had lived at home. Evidently the price of one's virtue is something in the neighborhood of an iPod.

Shanglan
 
The business of gradually luring teenagers [or even younger kids] into selling sexual images of themselves is exactly why there are underage sex laws. What is so bad about a teenage boy posing bare chested for $50? Really nothing. However, there is a next step and a next step and so on. One day, the kid gets out of high school applies for a job and someone recognizes him. Endgame.

Perhaps worse than just a kid being seduced, step by step, into being an underage porn star by adults is that the aging child pornstar will them recruit other children into the life. The underage sex laws are there for a purpose.

The people knowingly behind the kiddie porn should be punished severely, IMNTHO. An adult who innocently helps a kid set up a web site should not be punished.

JMHO.
 
When I was this kid's age, I would have done the same thing without hesitation. I would have considered even a fraction of the money to be easily worth it. I don't know if I would have continued to think that it had been after I got older.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
When I was this kid's age, I would have done the same thing without hesitation. I would have considered even a fraction of the money to be easily worth it. I don't know if I would have continued to think that it had been after I got older.

I would definitely have hestitated.

I don't get off on people watching me play with myself, and I've been brought up to aim for work I like doing.
 
Sub Joe said:
I would definitely have hestitated.

I don't get off on people watching me play with myself, and I've been brought up to aim for work I like doing.

I wouldn't have gotten off on being watched but I might have gotten off in spite of it. I would have done it strictly for the money, not because I was an exhibitionist. When I was 13 years old, it was 1953.
 
Back
Top