The New York Times is biased toward Republicans

[BrightShinyGirl]

Even when the story itself reports on Republican misdeeds, the headline either minimizes it or casts it as a “both sides” problem.

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/the-new-york-times-has-a-serious-headline-problem/

 

[Pad_Foot]

But but BUT!!
The media is controlled by the LEFT
By GEORGE SOROS !!

Where have all the progressive radio stations gone, long time bought up by the Right Wing.
Where do we get our news? On the new "CNN" Fair and Balanced.

 

[Comshaw]

Even when the story itself reports on Republican misdeeds, the headline either minimizes it or casts it as a “both sides” problem.

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/the-new-york-times-has-a-serious-headline-problem/

Nope, sorry. I don't see it. Because they don't use loaded words in the headline of his first example utilizing a heavily accented left bias they are being "vague and cowardly"? Did they do the same throughout the whole article? No, they did not. Even the author of the commentary admitted as much ("The New York Times wrote a sharp editorial last week ripping “right-wing extremists”...). The headline was accurate and neutral in presentation, IE; “Partisan Politics Put a Huge Win for Public Health at Risk”.

So no the author of the piece is just pissed because the Times didn't put an extreme left bias spin on the headline. Something, by the way, that I'm sure they would go absolutely apoplectic about if it had such a spin in the other direction.

Comshaw

 

[phrodeau]

It seems like they write headlines to get everyone to read the articles.

 

[Comshaw]

It seems like they write headlines to get everyone to read the articles.

DING! DING! DING! DING! We have a winner! Absofuckinglutly they do.

Comshaw