E.Jean Carroll's Story About trump Is Bullshit

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
62,004

ICYMI: New York Magazine’s Guessing Game — E. Jean Carroll’s Jacket Dress She Claimed to be Wearing During Alleged Trump Assault Was Not Until Years Later​

by Jim Hoft Sep. 8, 2024 12:00 pm

E. Jean Carroll posed for the cover of New York Magazine in June 2019. She was wearing what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket dress she had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1994.

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place. Carroll said she met Trump on the street and they decided to go buy lingerie at the high-end New York City department store before the attack. The entire story lacks credibility.

New York Magazine said on its cover, “The jacket dress she was wearing that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it again for the first time for her portrait with New York.”

E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Magazine in June 2019. Carroll said she kept the dress in her closet after the alleged assault. She says she never wore it again and that, “I have never had sex with anybody ever again.”

There's much more here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/case-you-missed-it-new-york-magazines-guessing-2/

In arguments before the Appeals Court a couple of day ago or so ago, Trump's lawyer eviscerated her entire argument in about seven minutes. The audio can be found on the Second Circuit Court Of Appeals website for anyone interested to listen to it themselves.
 
Trump is a sexual predator and a convicted felon. He is a typical republican rapist who promotes american rape culture.
 

ICYMI: New York Magazine’s Guessing Game — E. Jean Carroll’s Jacket Dress She Claimed to be Wearing During Alleged Trump Assault Was Not Until Years Later​

by Jim Hoft Sep. 8, 2024 12:00 pm

E. Jean Carroll posed for the cover of New York Magazine in June 2019. She was wearing what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket dress she had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1994.

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place. Carroll said she met Trump on the street and they decided to go buy lingerie at the high-end New York City department store before the attack. The entire story lacks credibility.

New York Magazine said on its cover, “The jacket dress she was wearing that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it again for the first time for her portrait with New York.”

E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Magazine in June 2019. Carroll said she kept the dress in her closet after the alleged assault. She says she never wore it again and that, “I have never had sex with anybody ever again.”

There's much more here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/case-you-missed-it-new-york-magazines-guessing-2/

In arguments before the Appeals Court a couple of day ago or so ago, Trump's lawyer eviscerated her entire argument in about seven minutes. The audio can be found on the Second Circuit Court Of Appeals website for anyone interested to listen to it themselves.
You should take a break from polishing Trump's marbles.
 
Of course, other than a fake tape, there is no evidence at all that Trump feels entitled to grab women by the pussy.

Besides, even if he did feel that entitlement, Carroll would not have been the chosen one. She would not have been the chosen one.
 
Yes, you are correct. Ms. Carroll just went to court to put on a charade—the judge, jury, etc. were all in on the joke. They all loved to sit there for hours and hours, day after day, as they just made up stuff. In the end, the “fix” was in and they found Orange Fuhrer “guilty.” But of course you’d believe that wrongguide (gateway dumbshit fan) as you’re a delusional idiot.
 
Yes, you are correct. Ms. Carroll just went to court to put on a charade—the judge, jury, etc. were all in on the joke. They all loved to sit there for hours and hours, day after day, as they just made up stuff. In the end, the “fix” was in and they found Orange Fuhrer “guilty.” But of course you’d believe that wrongguide (gateway dumbshit fan) as you’re a delusional idiot.
Oops, did I just get schooled?
 
Of course, other than a fake tape, there is no evidence at all that Trump feels entitled to grab women by the pussy.

Besides, even if he did feel that entitlement, Carroll would not have been the chosen one. She would not have been the chosen one.

Good boy, you deflected to another topic so fast you deserve a treat for it.
 
Good boy, you deflected to another topic so fast you deserve a treat for it.
Glad to see that even the most devout MAGAts recognize my skill at parody, even if you failed to get the link to E. Jean Carroll.

Keep trying. We're used to you missing the main points about misogyny.
 
Glad to see that even the most devout MAGAts recognize my skill at parody, even if you failed to get the link to E. Jean Carroll.

Keep trying. We're used to you missing the main points about misogyny.


7 minutes was all it took to DESTROY her claims.

But you go ahead and continue to think that perjury and malicious prosecution are parody.
 

ICYMI: New York Magazine’s Guessing Game — E. Jean Carroll’s Jacket Dress She Claimed to be Wearing During Alleged Trump Assault Was Not Until Years Later​

by Jim Hoft Sep. 8, 2024 12:00 pm

E. Jean Carroll posed for the cover of New York Magazine in June 2019. She was wearing what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket dress she had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1994.

She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place. Carroll said she met Trump on the street and they decided to go buy lingerie at the high-end New York City department store before the attack. The entire story lacks credibility.

New York Magazine said on its cover, “The jacket dress she was wearing that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it again for the first time for her portrait with New York.”

E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Magazine in June 2019. Carroll said she kept the dress in her closet after the alleged assault. She says she never wore it again and that, “I have never had sex with anybody ever again.”

There's much more here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/case-you-missed-it-new-york-magazines-guessing-2/

In arguments before the Appeals Court a couple of day ago or so ago, Trump's lawyer eviscerated her entire argument in about seven minutes. The audio can be found on the Second Circuit Court Of Appeals website for anyone interested to listen to it themselves.
A nine-person jury found him guilty. Guess that would also have made it on the cover of New York Magazine.
 
Last edited:
Sucks to be a Trump lawyer, @HisArpy. Just remember to stand in line behind him when he says how disappointed he is in your ability to sway the judges. Just a tidbit about that from Politico:

"Friday’s arguments didn’t concern Carroll’s own testimony at trial, and instead largely focused on the admissibility of the testimony of another witness — a woman, Jessica Leeds, who claimed Trump groped her on an airplane in 1979 — and of the so-called “Access Hollywood” tape, a 2005 recording in which Trump boasts of grabbing women “by the pussy.”

"Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, described the case as a “quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case,” and accused Carroll of having a “political motive” to smear Trump.

"Sauer argued that testimony from Leeds about the alleged airplane encounter should have been excluded because, at the time, there was no federal law against sexual assault on an airplane. Kaplan, [Carroll's lawyer] however, countered that there was a law in place at the time that prohibited “simple assault.”

"“It was a crime then to grope someone on a plane. It is a crime today to grope someone on a plane,” she told the panel."

~~~~
So, yeah the Trump lawyers really shredded E. Jean Carroll like a raggedly Ann dress. Damned lawyers trying to split hairs over sex is a crime on the ground but no laws about sex up in the air exist. So... Trump is free to have some sex even if the woman doesn't while up in the air. Go figure—damned Lawyers.
 
Back
Top