The Mud Slingin' thread

No, it is not. People hotlink images all the time, including myself.

I guess this is as good a quote as any to show how out of touch and uncaring and into "let them eat cake" you are. Apparently you aren't aware that your own forum rule #3 says hotlinking of copyrighted material isn't acceptable. The method used to copy and repost copyrighted material doesn't mean a thing in the decision to violate copyright by reposting material that doesn't belong to you. Suggesting you know little about copyright violation isn't slander (it would be libel, not slander, anyway, since it's written, not spoken)--not if it can be reasonably argued to be true.

Your postings to this thread and your empty brinkmanship disrespect to users who are providing the product of your Web site for free and who are spending considerable time explaining to other users procedures claimed but not delivered on this site has been demonstrated quite well by you here, I think.

Literotica is very much like a moldering, but long-loved tenement on Central Park in New York City. It's such a good location and has such a rich history that renters keep showing up--in the face of uncaring, inattentive, absentee owners just letting it deteriorate by not bothering to keep it up--and coming up with empty excuses and belligerent blustering when deterioration is pointed out. But location keeps the apartments filled--until the day the building collapses. And until then, the tenants do what they can to help each other find staircases in the building that haven't collapsed yet and that still lead somewhere toward where they are trying to go.

Fact is, while you are just being knee-jerk nasty and unresponsive in your posts here, I'm busy off trying to help users deal with your messed-up Web site. So, between the two of us, I think I'm the one being constructive on the Web site--at least toward the users of the Web site.
 
Last edited:
This is where I should put out there that in addition to most likely stealing that stock photo that you have to make sure when you purchase one that it is allowable to be used in erotica. Some photographers have on the photo info that they will not allow it or you have to ask permission.

You asking permission Jim?
 
lovecraft I wish you would just spill the dish on the asshat who this thread has become about rather than alluding to the juicy gossip. Is there a thread already in existence talking about the history? If yes, link please. I'm really curious.

It would really be too disgustingly hurtful to post to the board on it. If you want a gist of the incident, you could PM me and I'd give you one.
 
listen lovergirl its clear that, probably due to the holiday, you had a few drinks yesterday. Jesus listen to some of these ALTS - soulfulbard, lovescraftsgirl, sqirrelzo, scouries de muthafucka?

You got drunk, started this silly thread and got all the usual players excited. Which is fine and dandy. This silliness stays off the more important ScouriesWorld threads and in a week or so it will disappear in the LITEROTICA forum abyss.

I do think though that it would be nice before this thread dies if you would copy and post all the PMs you've sent out since you started the thread. I'd love to see the ones you've sent to the palace since you were publicly admonished.

It is always interesting to see what a person says in public and then behind your back...


YO MUTHAFUCKA! YOU BACK FROM BANGING YOUR WHOLE FAMILY?

WHAT'S THAT THING I HEAR?

OOHHHH, A FEW BABIES ARE ON THE WAY, RIGHT?

THAT'S SURPRISING, GIVEN THE FACT OF HOW SUPPORTIVE YOU ARE ABOUT ABORTION AND HARRASSMENT OF PREGNANT LADIES!

YOU HARRASSING YOUR MOMMA TOO?

SHAME.
 
Laurel, I hope you are still following this thread and read my contribution. You have responded even after claiming you would say no more so I have hope. I have a different point to make, one that might hit closer to home.

My husband joined Lit first to post a couple of stories. Then I posted a couple under his membership. We used volunteer editors, comments, and feedback to develop our writing. We stayed on the story side for almost a year.

This attitude is hurting your membership:
... We do not remove accounts simply because the user is unpopular, starts fights with others, insults other members and/or the admin, or has unpopular opinions.
Our first visits to forums were scary (just as readers) and almost drove us away from the site. So much meanness and crude behavior being allowed made us think Literotica was just as skanky as the bad sites we left behind. Hubby's first post here was an inquiry but placed in the Shark Pool (GB). We came away bloodied and didn't even visit for 3 months.

Indeed. I don't waste my time talking to people whose sole purpose is to insult and spread lies about the site, which is why I refuse to engage him in any way. He's not worth my time.
Saving the integrity of Lit and retaining its members isn't worth your time? Do you realize you are losing both?

A story feedback brought us back and we found the AH forum to be a decent place. We heard about contests and tried to find information about them. Unfortunately, Scouries' fake contest was the most prominent and drowned out the real ones Lit sponsors. We wasted a lot of time trying to find how to enter his contest, even looking around the Web for something called A.I.R.

We nearly left again in frustration. Only hubby's diligent research discovered his contest was a farce and how to enter the real contests.


I seriously doubt that's true. People come to and leave Lit every single day for a variety of reasons. He wants to believe he is Public Enemy No. 1, able to drive people from the site at will. You give him way too much power and credit.

Many come here, read a troll's posts, and put said troll on ignore - never thinking about him again until people like you bring him up.

You give him power over your time. You allow him to make your experience about him. Every time you mention him, you make other people who have him on ignore think about him. He couldn't pay for a better promoter.

He IS driving people away before they can get a grip on what is happening. Your doubts are costing you.

Ignore is a useful tool (he's the only one on my list) but it takes awhile to learn about that tool and you're losing members before they discover it.

You are wrong. He is his own best promoter and his disruption is costing you. I hope you listen to this old lady. He doesn't affect me anymore so I have no hidden desire to oust him. I just want to be a voice that assists you with taking control of a good thing (Lit) and clean it up.

{Contributions from AirRichard101}
 
Last edited:
I (we) work for james r scouries esq. I
(we) also work for the ASSOCIATION of INDEPENDANT READERS (A.I.R.). My (our) goal is to promote erotic fiction and the wonderful authors who are writing it. I (we) will also announce and promote the authors
who have been awarded the prestigious MANU AWARD.

I SAW A HORROR MOVIE WHERE MULTIPLE SPIRITS HAD GOTTEN INTO AN OLD LADY.

ONE WORD. CREEPY.

WTF IS:

I(WE)

SUPPOSED TO MEAN? ARE Y'ALL SIAMESE TWINS?

I DON'T SEE SOMEONE WIPING SOMEONE ELSE'S SHIT COMING OFF AS VERY BRIGHT AND RESPECTABLE.

OH! I'M SORRY!

THAT'S YOU WIPING YOUR OWN SHIT!
 
STFU PILOT

We might as well stick a stake through this one's heart too. Assuming the "new" posters posting to this thread are alts of regulars, including me, Laurel should be in a position to match up ISPs--and therefore knows none of them is me and that it would be dishonest to lump me with them.

As far was what you choose to espouse about it JBJ--who cares?
 
We might as well stick a stake through this one's heart too. Assuming the "new" posters posting to this thread are alts of regulars, including me, Laurel should be in a position to match up ISPs--and therefore knows none of them is me and that it would be dishonest to lump me with them.

As far was what you choose to espouse about it JBJ--who cares?

The fishy aroma gave you up.
 
Yes Ive seen the "contest" but not this insanity. As someone I know says, I feel the need to windex my computer screen!

You never met Scouries?

Stick around his pattern is he will be haunting us for a few months until his lies get exposed enough to slink away again.

You should ask him for a link to his AIR contests. :rolleyes:
 
I guess this is as good a quote as any to show how out of touch and uncaring and into "let them eat cake" you are. Apparently you aren't aware that your own forum rule #3 says hotlinking of copyrighted material isn't acceptable. The method used to copy and repost copyrighted material doesn't mean a thing in the decision to violate copyright by reposting material that doesn't belong to you. Suggesting you know little about copyright violation isn't slander (it would be libel, not slander, anyway, since it's written, not spoken)--not if it can be reasonably argued to be true.

Your postings to this thread and your empty brinkmanship disrespect to users who are providing the product of your Web site for free and who are spending considerable time explaining to other users procedures claimed but not delivered on this site has been demonstrated quite well by you here, I think.

Literotica is very much like a moldering, but long-loved tenement on Central Park in New York City.

Fact is, while you are just being knee-jerk nasty and unresponsive in your posts here, I'm busy off trying to help users deal with your messed-up Web site. So, between the two of us, I think I'm the one being constructive on the Web site--at least toward the users of the Web site.


Pilot,
Whilst I appreciate that you are [a] an accomplished and published writer and been on this board a lot longer than I, may I offer a few thoughts on this thread, which, to my mind, is occasionally a catalogue of chaos; made worse by comment such as yours (yes, there are a lot of others and I probably should list them but I cannot be bothered to read the whole thing again).

To my mind,
[1]. Lit belongs to Laurel & Manu. It's their train set to do with as they wish.
Personally, I rather enjoy it, but I'm not keen on the complete chaos which I see as the GB.
I've managed to learn something of writing as a craft, and managed to have a few bits published, for which I am chuffed and happy.
[2]. Lets face it, if we on the AH cannot 'moderate' ourselves, someone else might have to do it and that will not please too many folk, I'm thinking, especially the Authoritarian types.
[3]. If we don't like the way some things are done, I'm sure there are other sites to clutter up.

This is my personal, knee-jerk reaction, you understand, not a personal attack.
 
We are moderating the place in addition to providing the base product--and doing all of navagation aids in a lake full of junk, Handley--and getting kicked in the balls by management for having a care for the other users and suggesting what needs fixed. That's rather the point.

There's a Chinese fairy tale about the emperor and his clothes . . . And it includes a whole bunch of people standing around and fawning over the emperor's nice (but absent) clothes. Well, because he was the emperor, you know.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of policing I am on my way to look up "Wendy Stone's" publisher and contact them about scouries using their copyrighted bookcover as part of his bullshit.

I quoted it on another thread so he could not delete it.

I'm tired of playing with this idiot. Time to find out what the owner of that material thinks the law is.
 
Likely to have as little effect on him and the Web site joining him in the copyright violation as my notice to him and this Web site yesterday that he's reposting my copyrighted book cover without permission.

Basically, as I've noted before, I think both are clueless on what consitutes a copyright violation.
 
Last edited:
Likely to have as little effect on him and the Web site joining him in the copyright violation as my notice to him and this Web site yesterday that he's reposting my copyrighted book cover without permission.

Well may I make a suggestion?

Why not have your publisher issue the warning rather than yourself?

And correct me if I am wrong, but the warning wouldn't go to dipstick, but the site.
 
Sort of a waste of time on the clueless.

Maybe, but I have a few minutes to kill.

Never know maybe when the clueless is handed a clue they might think on it.

BTW nice sig.

When I went by your post real quick I thought it was 3113....then I realized the covers were better.
 
I love to steal from the other authors and totally support plagiarism.

3 cheers to scouries for developing this art into a noble proffesion.

YO MUTHAFUCKA! WHAT'S THAT THING I HEAR? YOU STEALING FROM THE OTHER PEOPLE?

THESE AIN'T YOUR MOMMA'S PANTIES FROM YOUR BOOTY RAID, YOU HEAR ME? PEOPLE GETTING PISSED OFF AT YOU FOR STEALING THEIR HARD WORK DOESN'T SOUND LIKE A GOOD PROSPECT.

WANT A GOOD ADVICE?

CHUG A FEW MOTH BALLS AND WASH IT DOWN WITH ALCOHOL.

I GUARANTEE YOU A FAR MORE PEACEFUL EXISTENCE THAN THE SICK LIFE YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW.

YOU CAN SUE ME IF IT DOESN'T WORK.
 
We might as well stick a stake through this one's heart too. Assuming the "new" posters posting to this thread are alts of regulars, including me, Laurel should be in a position to match up ISPs--and therefore knows none of them is me and that it would be dishonest to lump me with them.

As far was what you choose to espouse about it JBJ--who cares?

This is the only site I'm on, that allows alts. Sometimes it makes me wonder who"s who, the site is so old- it might as well be the old west- it does only have one sherriff, and too many town drunks.
 
This is the only site I'm on, that allows alts. Sometimes it makes me wonder who"s who, the site is so old- it might as well be the old west- it does only have one sherriff, and too many town drunks.

THERE'S ONLY ONE TOWN DRUNK OUT HERE AND THAT'S THE SISTAFUCKA ON POST #176 OF THIS THREAD.
 
Last edited:
I think people would have to be pretty dense to not know which "alt" here is mine. Especially seeings a parody of scouries alt.

Alts are not the problem here or anywhere else.

Its the one asshole behind them.
 
Back
Top