The Isolated Blurt Thread XXIX : So Stupid

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, he actually did not "get it." He was maybe third in line.

With the way the thread has been manipulated it now appears that aquagirl is the threadholder.

I sent Laural a PM and nominated him. He had post 4999
 
Last edited:
On a bright note:

von_Bismark, having measured for drapes was on the phone with the movers when the blurt was assigned.

Changed his post to:

Blurt Bitches Pool Party

From:

attachment.php


He was in the loop just enough to know the Blurt King was going to be dethroned. Just not enough to know he wasn't the heir apparent.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190725-112844_Firefox.jpg
    Screenshot_20190725-112844_Firefox.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 0
Harry made the threads like Matt did yesterday; Laurel didn't split and new thread. I don't think the first one technically reached 5,000. But I don't feel like checking.
..
It didn't, I wanted to avoid this madness and started another because I like to win.
 
You're being well mannered over this but I do see why the blurt threads shouldn't be hosted by the same person, or alt, repeatedly. It can become polarizing.

If I'd won it before, I'd agree.

Knowing the others had to cheat to "win" will stay with them long after this thread is forgotten.


I used to have this coach who told us, “How you do one thing is how you do everything. You loaf in practice, you’re gonna loaf in the game. You cheat on your tests, you’re gonna cheat on your wife.”

from Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump by Rick Reilly
 
Last edited:
Tiggered que makes me laugh, like those hearty deep down in your belly laughs.

But sometimes... sometimes I find I start to feel sad for him. I think about the things he gets fixated on and all the time he spends running around the boards chasing these things, and trying to convince others to see it, see it as he sees it.
The short bursts of frantic, error filled, reply posts, often replying to posts not even intended for or directed to him, combined with the scrolling snore fest posts, where sixteen paragraphs later he has really said nothing of substance.


Then triggered que posts another ironic, good-enough-for-me-but-not-for-thee posts, and my sadness disappears and I start laughing again.
 
You're being well mannered over this but I do see why the blurt threads shouldn't be hosted by the same person, or alt, repeatedly. It can become polarizing.

Yeah, no.

No one ever complained about successive blurt holders until killswitch one twice in a row and those who have engraved plaques at the blurt thread table objected..

Now we're having a conversation about who is and who isn't this or that alt when I'm assured that none of that's important and no one should be able to discern when obvious is obvious.

You pretty much have to decide that if someone waddles like a recently fat guy, smells like a recently fat guy and sounds like a recently fat guy - he's that fat guy ...or we take alts at their face value. Cannot have it both ways.

Well you can. Since that is what we have.
 
Tiggered que makes me laugh, like those hearty deep down in your belly laughs.

But sometimes... sometimes I find I start to feel sad for him. I think about the things he gets fixated on and all the time he spends running around the boards chasing these things, and trying to convince others to see it, see it as he sees it.
The short bursts of frantic, error filled, reply posts, often replying to posts not even intended for or directed to him, combined with the scrolling snore fest posts, where sixteen paragraphs later he has really said nothing of substance.


Then triggered que posts another ironic, good-enough-for-me-but-not-for-thee posts, and my sadness disappears and I start laughing again.

The whole concern trolling thing? That doesn't actually work when you're a dedicated attack alt.

Try again, "long time lurker" who has done literally nothing but comment, spectate, and referee long-standing feuds that you should have no interest in at all.
 
Yeah, no.

No one ever complained about successive blurt holders until killswitch one twice in a row and those who have engraved plaques at the blurt thread table objected..

Now we're having a conversation about who is and who isn't this or that alt when I'm assured that none of that's important and no one should be able to discern when obvious is obvious.

You pretty much have to decide that if someone waddles like a recently fat guy, smells like a recently fat guy and sounds like a recently fat guy - he's that fat guy ...or we take alts at their face value. Cannot have it both ways.

Well you can. Since that is what we have.

Seek help, Connie.
 
..
It didn't, I wanted to avoid this madness and started another because I like to win.

Most people define "winning" as actually beating another in a contest, not by cutting down an alley to shorten the race.

If you'll do some soul-searching you will find that you don't actually like winning, you just simply hate losing. That's what loosers <sic> do; they avoid losing at all costs, including personal integrity, rather than concentrating on winning.

That's why even when the Blurred crowd managed to get the last blurt holder and you still couldn't bring yourself to return to a thread even though your stated reason which was you had it on ignore made absolutely no sense since he couldn't possibly post anything under that handle.

Loosers gotta loose.

Have you considered just going back to the writers hang out? Much better chance of not having your ass handed to you there
 
The whole concern trolling thing? That doesn't actually work when you're a dedicated attack alt.

Try again, "long time lurker" who has done literally nothing but comment, spectate, and referee long-standing feuds that you should have no interest in at all.


“Your post is a good source of irony.”
~Liam/lil lace/Magnus Richard/Not Castor/que’s BFF/oral accents/notfeasance​


What was that thing you said the other day, about double-standards? You don’t appear to wear your thrift store referee shirt equally, everywhere.

Hypocrisy much, que?
 

Kudos.

Always willing to acknowledge the discomfort of being hoisted on my own petard.

I'll wager the butthurt is salved much sooner at the big kid's table. I can't imagine any of us at the big kids table sending off a flurry of PMs to (direct quote) "Mama Laurel" to intervene.

Then there's the smug satisfaction of knowing that an entire team of blurt bitches working in concert could not snag that 5,000th post. This was not some night raid. This was middle of the day, all hands on deck effort that failed while one poster sat and sniped that post right out from under y'all.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
 
“Your post is a good source of irony.”
~Liam/lil lace/Magnus Richard/Not Castor/que’s BFF/oral accents/notfeasance​


What was that thing you said the other day, about double-standards? You don’t appear to wear your thrift store referee shirt equally, everywhere.

Hypocrisy much, que?

"I don't think that word means what you think it means." -Mandy Patinkin as an eagle Montoya in The Princess Bride

Sorry to interrupt though. you were just about to tell the class who you used to be. You know back when you used to lurk and salivate after Aquagirl? You obviously would have been a well-known poster. Surely you had something to say on the board that didn't involve other people's feuds back then, right?
 
"I don't think that word means what you think it means." -Mandy Patinkin as an eagle Montoya in The Princess Bride

Sorry to interrupt though. you were just about to tell the class who you used to be. You know back when you used to lurk and salivate after Aquagirl? You obviously would have been a well-known poster. Surely you had something to say on the board that didn't involve other people's feuds back then, right?

you really need to get that voice to text thing fixed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top