MajorRewrite
Iffy
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Posts
- 8,360
Can't wait to watch all you Biden ass licking loonytards go absolutely ballistic when Thun goes nuclear.
Are you having a stroke?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't wait to watch all you Biden ass licking loonytards go absolutely ballistic when Thun goes nuclear.
No, but you will shortly.Are you having a stroke?
No, but you will shortly.
Another typical Biden ass licking libtard reaction: PROJECTION!!!Nah uh, you!!You do a great impression of the Petulant Man-Baby president.
Maybe you should ask “Thun” for help with your next comment?
And why are you obsessed with Biden’s ass? Is this a new thing, or have you been obsessed with it for years? Do you dream about it?
Another typical Biden ass licking libtard reaction: PROJECTION!!!
Only an intellectual midget like you would compare projection to doubling down.You doubled down on your Biden ass obsession, loon.
Really, ask “Thun” for help on your next reply. It can only help.![]()
I can see how properly delivered facts might cause you a bit of rectal discomfort; truth tends to chafe when you sit on it too long.Good job regurgitating the wacko propaganda you’ve been fed, sheep.
IMpoRteD fOreiGn-DepEndeNt vOtTing BLoC
Only an intellectual midget like you would compare projection to doubling down.
No, you didn't "notice" any such thing. You heard false propaganda and you believed it. Biden sent FEMA into NC and provided all the help that was available (which is a lot more than would be available if you got your wish list re: taxes, but that's beside the point).Emergency aid is a different ballgame, though I noticed that your leader funded blue areas but somehow forgot to fund western North Carolina. I guess that's what they deserve for not voting for him.
We would also have some states providing help only for people whom the majority there liked. Not a good plan at all.But we shouldn't be establishing programs, restricting who benefits, then telling the states that it's their baby and then funding part of it for them. If we just left money in the states in the first place, they'd have more resources and we'd have less centralized power.
The study you're referring to showed hydroxycloroquine did not in fact reduce risk of infection, and other studies also showed it was dangerous and also reduced the supply for cases where that drug was legitimately needed. And Trump didn't just "say it might work", he repeatedly sounded off about it at a time when people were desperate, leading directly to at least one death.In 2021, a study in the American Journal of Medicine found some effectiveness for hydroxychloroquine if used early. But because Trump said it might work, therefore it automatically doesn't.
That is simply not true. Witnesses on-site (just a bunch of uneducated red-state hicks; what yould they possibly know aobut their own experience?) kept saying they were getting no help. Biden did not send FEMA in until very late, and FEMA did virtually nothing, according to people on the ground there.No, you didn't "notice" any such thing. You heard false propaganda and you believed it. Biden sent FEMA into NC and provided all the help that was available (which is a lot more than would be available if you got your wish list re: taxes, but that's beside the point).
BS. Only hardcore blue ones.We would also have some states providing help only for people whom the majority there liked.
Nobody said it prevented the infection, but that if used early, it has some effectiveness in treating it. Taht is true, and is supported by this study.The study you're referring to showed hydroxycloroquine did not in fact reduce risk of infection
Again, BS. Trump repeatedly said what was true, that it had some effectiveness in fighting COVID, and numerous people publicly stated that they took it and it worked for them. But again, you and your party think you know their experience better than they do.Trump didn't just "say it might work", he repeatedly sounded off about it at a time when people were desperate, leading directly to at least one death.
Correction: according to the people in the news sources you use. That they were there doesn't necessarily mean they were telling the truth, and right wing media has a long and storied history of inventing things like this out of whole cloth.That is simply not true. Witnesses on-site (just a bunch of uneducated red-state hicks; what yould they possibly know aobut their own experience?) kept saying they were getting no help. Biden did not send FEMA in until very late, and FEMA did virtually nothing, according to people on the ground there.
Times Now is notoriously undependable when it comes to factual accuracy: https://www.altnews.in/compilation-times-nows-experiments-untruth/But when the bridge collapsed in Baltimore, it was immediate.
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/...ildfires-sparks-controversy-article-117150575
No, but I do know better than to believe people who would say "Biden can't swim" if he walked on water.it has sparked outrage in North Carolina. Many residents took to social media to question why similar federal aid was not provided after Hurricane Helene devastated their state in September last year, leaving more than 100 dead.
But you know better than the people who live there, right?
It would be one thing if Trump had advised people to talk to a doctor about it. But that ain't what he did.Nobody said it prevented the infection, but that if used early, it has some effectiveness in treating it. Taht is true, and is supported by this study.
Nope. That's not how vaccines work. They greatly reduce the risk of infection, but they don't eliminate it entirely. Most people who understand what vaccines are don't need that explained to them, however.However, your cult did, in fact, claim that if you took the vaccine you wouldn't get COVID, despite the fact that people did.
Again, BS. Trump repeatedly said what was true, that it had some effectiveness in fighting COVID,
Cite please.and numerous people publicly stated that they took it and it worked for them.
Better than people who look to Donald Trump for advice on their health? Erm...yes, yes we do think we know more than them about, well, just about everything.But again, you and your party think you know their experience better than they do.
No, you didn't "notice" any such thing. You heard false propaganda and you believed it. Biden sent FEMA into NC and provided all the help that was available (which is a lot more than would be available if you got your wish list re: taxes, but that's beside the point).
We would also have some states providing help only for people whom the majority there liked. Not a good plan at all.
The study you're referring to showed hydroxycloroquine did not in fact reduce risk of infection, and other studies also showed it was dangerous and also reduced the supply for cases where that drug was legitimately needed. And Trump didn't just "say it might work", he repeatedly sounded off about it at a time when people were desperate, leading directly to at least one death.
Correction: according to the people in the news sources you use. That they were there doesn't necessarily mean they were telling the truth, and right wing media has a long and storied history of inventing things like this out of whole cloth.
Times Now is notoriously undependable when it comes to factual accuracy: https://www.altnews.in/compilation-times-nows-experiments-untruth/
No, but I do know better than to believe people who would say "Biden can't swim" if he walked on water.
It would be one thing if Trump had advised people to talk to a doctor about it. But that ain't what he did.
Nope. That's not how vaccines work. They greatly reduce the risk of infection, but they don't eliminate it entirely. Most people who understand what vaccines are don't need that explained to them, however.
His exact words were: “What do you have to lose? Take it." Nothing even a little bit nuanced about that. Trump is not a doctor, and plenty of doctors warned what he called for was dangerous. It could cause heart problems among other things.
Cite please.
Better than people who look to Donald Trump for advice on their health? Erm...yes, yes we do think we know more than them about, well, just about everything.
It doesn't work . No study has proven otherwiseIn 2021, a study in the American Journal of Medicine found some effectiveness for hydroxychloroquine if used early. But because Trump said it might work, therefore it automatically doesn't.
According to WITNESSES WHO WERE THERE, and your assertion is simply false. You're describing the mainstream media.according to the people in the news sources you use. That they were there doesn't necessarily mean they were telling the truth, and right wing media has a long and storied history of inventing things like this out of whole cloth.
Altnews.com is notoriously undependeable when it comes to factual accuracy.Times Now is notoriously undependable when it comes to factual accuracy: https://www.altnews.in/compilation-times-nows-experiments-untruth/
No such people exist, but people like you would say that about Trump if he walked on water. If Trump cured cancer, you'd scream about the loss of research funding.I do know better than to believe people who would say "Biden can't swim" if he walked on water.
What he said was accurate, and he knew people who had used it.It would be one thing if Trump had advised people to talk to a doctor about it. But that ain't what he did.
Yet your cult repeatedly told us we couldn't get COVID if we got the shot.That's not how vaccines work. They greatly reduce the risk of infection, but they don't eliminate it entirely. Most people who understand what vaccines are don't need that explained to them, however.
Like the vaccine you forced on all of us. Like everything, it has side effects. But it also worked for some people, if used early, as the 2021 study in the Journal of American Medicine stated.His exact words were: “What do you have to lose? Take it." Nothing even a little bit nuanced about that. Trump is not a doctor, and plenty of doctors warned what he called for was dangerous. It could cause heart problems among other things.
In March 2021, then-CDC Director Rachel Wallensky told MSNBC "Our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick."Cite please.
So you believe, but it's another false belief by your cult.Erm...yes, yes we do think we know more than them about, well, just about everything.
Oh Look, Maga found a Democrat willing to parrot the discredited "but but $300,000!" talk point.The Lone House Democrat Who Thinks His Party Has the Shutdown All Wrong
Maine’s Jared Golden says his party is being pushed in the wrong direction by far-left groups
His vote to keep the government funded wasn’t a big surprise, but his commentary afterward made waves. In a statement on the first day of the shutdown, he accused Democratic leaders of falling prey to the demands of “far-left groups” who wanted them to “put on a show of their opposition to President Trump” while hurting Americans in the process.
“I’m not willing to shut down the government over healthcare subsidies for households making $300,000.”
https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...bb2fb?st=4vSQNT&reflink=article_copyURL_share
I don’t care about what anyone on this board said or did. The House passed a clean CR in September. It’s gotten a majority vote in the Senate multiple times. It’s time for Democrats to stop the nonsense and reopen the government.Oh Look, Maga found a Democrat willing to parrot the discredited "but but $300,000!" talk point.
The $300,000 income subsidy is a theoretical maximum that a couple with a dozen children all living in a remote corner of Alaska where healthcare is very limited.
A more realistic maximum for subsidies would be a two-earner household earning $150,000.
Without subsidies, insurance premiums are expected to rise about $1500 to $2000 per month for family coverage.
I can see how that would get you excited, given your wholesale devotion to "cruelty is the point".
Medical coverage should be a right for heterosexual Christian white men and their families, right?
You're a fucking nazi.
When one of your kids or grandkids gets a debilitating illness, I suspect you'll be talking out of the other side of your mouth.
I remember AJ braying he did not need no fucking required insurance, he had something BETTER: a TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR CASH RESERVE FOR MEDICAL EMERGENCIES.
He found out a few years later that optic nerve cancer made that ten grand evaporate faster than a Trump promise.
Then he died.

The Lone House Democrat Who Thinks His Party Has the Shutdown All Wrong
Maine’s Jared Golden says his party is being pushed in the wrong direction by far-left groups
His vote to keep the government funded wasn’t a big surprise, but his commentary afterward made waves. In a statement on the first day of the shutdown, he accused Democratic leaders of falling prey to the demands of “far-left groups” who wanted them to “put on a show of their opposition to President Trump” while hurting Americans in the process.
“I’m not willing to shut down the government over healthcare subsidies for households making $300,000.”
https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...bb2fb?st=4vSQNT&reflink=article_copyURL_share
Oh Look, Maga found a Democrat willing to parrot the discredited "but but $300,000!" talk point.
The $300,000 income subsidy is a theoretical maximum that a couple with a dozen children all living in a remote corner of Alaska where healthcare is very limited.
A more realistic maximum for subsidies would be a two-earner household earning $150,000.
Without subsidies, insurance premiums are expected to rise about $1500 to $2000 per month for family coverage.
I can see how that would get you excited, given your wholesale devotion to "cruelty is the point".
Medical coverage should be a right for heterosexual Christian white men and their families, right?
You're a fucking nazi.
When one of your kids or grandkids gets a debilitating illness, I suspect you'll be talking out of the other side of your mouth.
I remember AJ braying he did not need no fucking required insurance, he had something BETTER: a TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR CASH RESERVE FOR MEDICAL EMERGENCIES.
He found out a few years later that optic nerve cancer made that ten grand evaporate faster than a Trump promise.
Then he died.
I don’t care about what anyone on this board said or did. The House passed a clean CR in September. It’s gotten a majority vote in the Senate multiple times. It’s time for Democrats to stop the nonsense and reopen the government.
Trump has stiffed more contractors and workers than anyone. He admits he'd rather hire new people than pay overtime to his regulars.Certain people such as Air Traffic Controllers will now be expected to work for free.
Turns out that MAGATs love Socialism.