The evidence is slowly accumulating that the Twin Towers were demolished........

Ham Murabi said:
The tower that was hit second collapsed first, and the plane struck it lower.
I'm no engineer, but that's makes perfectly good sense to me. In addition to the immediate structural damage and the ensuing damage caused by the fire, the tower hit second also had more weight to support above the damage.
All this is secondary, however, to the fact that the Jews, aside from controlling the banks, also control the media. And that's why Donkkkeydickkkhead's theory will never see the light of day in the mainstream media.
That and the fact that he's a total fucktard.

ahhh . . . Hand Masturbate . . . coming from the biggest wanker on Lit that is quite a compliment . . . ;)
 
crysede said:
Isn’t it obvious?
The terrorists flew the planes into the buildings to cover up the fact that they bombed them.

Only when the mangoes come back into season . . . :p


I think the theory goes "it was necessary to have an external threat to the U$A. This was organised by rogue elements of the so-called security forces.

Hi-jacking one 747 is difficult enough. Hi-jacking four ($) 747s almost simultaneously is bloody near impossible IF the U$ security system is working properly.

The alleged hi-jackers were principally Saudis, with only ONE (1) Afghani who was used to justify the invasion of Afghanistan by the U$ military forces. However, the cosy relationship between the Saud family of Saudi Arabia and the AmeriKKKan oil corporations protected Saudi Arabia from possible reltaliation by the U$A . . . so the Shrubya Nazi regime in the White House illegally invaded, occupied, carpet-bagged and committed genocide against the Iraqi people.

This continued the policy post Desertstorm I of the U$ embargo to force Saddam Hussein to open up Iraq to oil exploration by AmeriKKKan oil corporations. :)

Meanwhile back at ground Zero . . . the WTC collapsed vertically after some unexplained explosions were heard.

Now from an insurance point of view this was disastrous . . . ginormous liability.

So the insurance companies were a little concerned that the WTC was the only building of that type to collapse under the stress of a plane collision and subsequent fire that was not hot enough to melt the naked steel girders that supported the structure.

Meanwhile, back at the White House, Shrubya was taking yet another holiday to alow Cheney et al to get on with the important business of facilitating the illegal invasion etc of Iraq. :)
 
Some day, DonK, years from now you'll be sitting at home and it will suddenly hit you like a ton of bricks. The epiphany will be so strong it will stagger you and you'll walk, weak-kneed to the nearest mirror, look into and say "Wow, I'm a blithering idiot."
 
KRCummings said:
Some day, DonK, years from now you'll be sitting at home and it will suddenly hit you like a ton of bricks. The epiphany will be so strong it will stagger you and you'll walk, weak-kneed to the nearest mirror, look into and say "Wow, I'm a blithering idiot."

heheheheh . . . well . . . that is a better proposition than you currently have looking in the mirror . . . ugly goes right through to the bone . . . and is permanent . . . ;)
 
Don K Dyck said:
The alleged hi-jackers were principally Saudis, with only ONE (1) Afghani who was used to justify the invasion of Afghanistan by the U$ military forces.
Then why involve any Saudis? If this was sponsored by the US, why not just finger some random Iraqis? Then there wouldn't have been messy issues to deal with transitioning the war from Afghanistan to Iraq. They could have started out with Iraq.

Meanwhile back at ground Zero . . . the WTC collapsed vertically after some unexplained explosions were heard.
If the WTC collapsed because of the explosions, why use planes at all? Explosives had previously been used on the WTC; doing it again wouldn't have been beyond the realm of possibility.
 
How in the world are we ever again supose to believe everything the government says is the honest truth? With that i mind, who can believe them when they "claim" each and every other rumor, theory, speculation, idea and/or sugestion to their "facts of the matter" are outragious, false, fictious lies?

several other things to give thought to:

The government has a statute which seals confidential classisfied documents for X number of years then th papers are declassfied and become accessible to public access. At the time of the 911 attacks, he soon to be unsealed paperwork on the assination of President Kennedy was housed in a vault located in one of the twin towers.

For those amoung us so inclined to do some investigate things further on our own, you may want to research a man named Prescott Bush, grandfather to current President Bush and father to former President Bush. Perhaps you might find it interesting to learn about his links to Nazi Germany and his ties to the "doctors" who did their "research experiments" on prisoners housed in the concentration camps.

The topic of "microtechnology" might interest some of you, along with "cloning" and "human genetics"....

Perhaps look back at the history involving the 1st Gulf War and some might gain a new inight and perspective on the current Gulf War.

Here is something to check out also: www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm

Fact, fiction, truth, lies... who's to say who knows what... hard to believe anything is beyond blief these days...
 
velcroktty said:
Here is something to check out also: www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm

Fact, fiction, truth, lies... who's to say who knows what... hard to believe anything is beyond blief these days...

Yep, that rag is full of facts, fiction, and lies. Some of their other articles include:

Battle Of LA UFO: Stunning New Photo Enhancements

Jewish Dominance in the Porn Industry

Jewish Revisionist Tours Auschwitz and Uncovers the Truth

They are really into the whole UFO/Government conspiracy and coverup thing. I bet velcrokitty buys up every supermarket tabloid she can get her hands on and thinks "if it weren't true, they wouldn't print it."

I hope none of you people have children.
 
miles said:
Yep, that rag is full of facts, fiction, and lies. Some of their other articles include:

Battle Of LA UFO: Stunning New Photo Enhancements

Jewish Dominance in the Porn Industry

Jewish Revisionist Tours Auschwitz and Uncovers the Truth

They are really into the whole UFO/Government conspiracy and coverup thing. I bet velcrokitty buys up every supermarket tabloid she can get her hands on and thinks "if it weren't true, they wouldn't print it."

I hope none of you people have children.
Oh, c'mon, Miles. Don't you know there's an international conspiracy to keep these hard-hitting, journalitic efforts out of the mainstream media?
 
velcroktty said:
The government has a statute which seals confidential classisfied documents for X number of years then th papers are declassfied and become accessible to public access. At the time of the 911 attacks, he soon to be unsealed paperwork on the assination of President Kennedy was housed in a vault located in one of the twin towers.

So the towers came down to stop these documents from going public? LMAO!! The Freedom of Information Act does exist, but is not followed. I've seen plenty of shows where people have used that act to try to get various documents and are denied. Or the documents are given to them blacked out. That act is a joke, they'd simply say "what papers" instead of killing and destroying property to hide them. Besides, if they were in a vault they're probably still intact.

Next reason?
 
They blew up the Murrow building to finger angry white men...

Same reason they fried Koresh 'n Krew.

BASTAWDS!
 
storm1969 said:
So the towers came down to stop these documents from going public? LMAO!! The Freedom of Information Act does exist, but is not followed. I've seen plenty of shows where people have used that act to try to get various documents and are denied. Or the documents are given to them blacked out. That act is a joke, they'd simply say "what papers" instead of killing and destroying property to hide them. Besides, if they were in a vault they're probably still intact.

Next reason?

Has anyone checked "Sloppy" Sandy Bergers' socks?

:D :D :D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Has anyone checked "Sloppy" Sandy Bergers' socks?

:D :D :D
You'd never find them. He listened to the Surgeon General and he now practices safe socks.
 
Problem Child said:
Never before has there been a building the size of the WTC that had sustained not only structural damage from the impact of a plane while simultaneously suffering the effects of fires on multiple floors. When the fires started on several floors at once, the fire system may have been overwhelmed, or else the plane may have taken out the fire sytem, causing the fires to rage unchecked. .

Re: fires that raged unchecked.

Hmmm...funny, no evidence of that. No witnesses for that either. The very opposite actually.

Kevin Ryan (an executive at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the company that certified the steel used in the construction of the World Trade Center) seriously questioned the common theory that fuel fires caused the Twin Towers to collapse. - From an email to Dr Frank Gayle (director of the government team)
The evaluation of paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation.

However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed bits of the building's steel core to "soften and buckle"(5). Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C". To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above 1100C. However, this new summary report suggests that much lower temperatures were able to not only soften the steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to rapid structural collapse.

This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers.




Brian Clark, one of the few survivors from above the aircraft impact level in WTC 2 said this of the fires he saw whilst coming down the stairwell: "You could see through the wall and the cracks and see flames just, just licking up, not a roaring inferno, just quiet flames licking up and smoke sort of eking through the wall."

The New York Fire department tapes reveal that there were only small fires
Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones." Ladder 15: "Floor 78?". Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four, numerous civilians, we gonna need two engines up here."

The story of Stanley Praimnath who was feet away from the plane impact on WTC 2: "As he curled into a fetal position under his desk, the plane tore into the side of the building and exploded. Miraculously, Stanley was unhurt. However, he could see a flaming wing of the plane in the doorway of his department. Stanley's office resembled a battle zone--walls flattened into dusty heaps, office equipment strewn violently, flames flickering about and rubble everywhere."


Not much evidence of a raging inferno. None in fact.
 
Time for him to follow the Sturgeon General and go up the river.
 
Don is Mel Gibson without the script.

Like Woody, he should only be read and appreciated as comic relief...
 
sticky_keyboard said:
You'd never find them. He listened to the Surgeon General and he now practices safe socks.

Well, check his briefcase then.

Get CSI on his shredded documents...

:D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Don is Mel Gibson without the script.

Like Woody, he should only be read and appreciated as comic relief...

heheheheh . . . no such luck . . . Mel Gibson went to NIDA and made a fortune showing the Yanks how to make films . . . :D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Well, check his briefcase then.

Get CSI on his shredded documents...

:D
It's bad enough to have to check his socks. How'd you like to be the poor slob who has to check his briefs?
 
Don.

Mel lives in California now. I think he's a citizen and a Republican to boot.

He's on Hannity all the fawkin' time.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Don.

Mel lives in California now. I think he's a citizen and a Republican to boot.

He's on Hannity all the fawkin' time.

He was born and raised in the states. Didn't move to Oz until he was 12.

Ishmael
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
That's why he got by with it.

The sign said check your briefs at the door.

No one wanted to look...
Nixon had plumbers to fix the leaks.

Clinton had electricians to remove the shorts.
 
Back
Top