Don K Dyck
Devilish Don Downunder
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2002
- Posts
- 8,255
storm1969 said:Without a second attack, those workers still would have died when the fucking building fell on them. The second attack itself killed no emergency workers. They could have just bombed every fire station in the city instead. It probably would have been more efficient.
My question is, why kill experienced emergency crews? What advantage does that give? They're no different than any individual citizen that died unless you want their services sometime down the road. You know, like blowing up oil refineries in WW2 so that machines don't have fuel for future use. Had they blown up 10 more buildings 2 months after the attack, that would make a little sense I guess... but they didn't.
You kill emergency worked to spread chaos among the survivors . . . just like the AmeriKKKans camoflague food parcels to look similar to cluster bombs . . . that blow up, maim and horribly disfigure innocent Afghani kids searching for their daily feed . . . just so that you demoralise the Afghani parents . . . and increase hatred for all Americans, civl and military, in the Arab world . . .