Statistically Trump could not win without white people.

Apparently, African elephants aren't anywhere near domesticable as Asian elephants. The reasons why aren't exactly clear, but it may have something to do with Asian elephants being smaller and less aggressive as social animals.

Can't imagine why.....

http://www.securityafricaonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/kenyan-ivory-poaching-620.jpg

Africa has geographical challenges that have long hindered social technology, beyond the shit legacy of colonial exploitation.

Challenges, not blocks.

Basically I'm saying that sub Saharan Africans are just as capable as any other members of H. Sapiens, but the social technologies, thus the cultures, have had a very different evolutionary track which does not lend itself to equivalent outcomes.

Oh I totally agree....it's their culture.

It's not lack of resources.

If they put the AK's down for 2 seconds and stopped fighting for a couple generations, established law and order, started raising their kids and educating them instead of just breeding....

It would be just like Korea, shit hole to 1st world in 40 years.

Look how far China has come in 30....it's fucking INCREDIBLE.

There is no reason Mozambique, Tanzania, Zimbabwe etc. aren't part of the 1st world....except that they don't want that world and reject that culture.
 
I looked it up because I had no idea but apparently it's a technicality but elephants have never actually been domesticated. Tamed and trained, yes but not actually domesticated. That requires breeding that results in what is essentially a different elephant.

Well I stand corrected then.

Still, they are a valuable resources as beasts of burden and hardly an excuse for Africa's stunted advancement.
 
One site I read said there is some argument over whether or not they have actually been domesticated but most agree it requires the breeding programs that have yet to happen. I assume because breeding elephants is a tad harder than dogs.

There is some debate on the term "domestication" for animals. For flora it's easy.

Elephants, like dogs, are highly social mammals. Like dogs, elephants are pretty damn smart. Unlike dogs, elephants are fucking huge compared to humans, and I'm pretty certain elephants understand this. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure elephants understand that humans are nasty little apes which have little issue exterminating a non-human that becomes a threat.

Dogs are smaller, but they also have been interacting with humans longer than any other species. The two have had a long history of interactive symbiosis.
 
Oh I totally agree....it's their culture.

It's not lack of resources.

If they put the AK's down for 2 seconds and stopped fighting for a couple generations, established law and order, started raising their kids and educating them instead of just breeding....

It would be just like Korea, shit hole to 1st world in 40 years.

Look how far China has come in 30....it's fucking INCREDIBLE.

There is no reason Mozambique, Tanzania, Zimbabwe etc. aren't part of the 1st world....except that they don't want that world and reject that culture.
See, that's partially what I'm saying.

There hasn't been the millennia of social development in sub saharan Africa. The advance beyond tribal/ethnic conflict is not an indigenous phenomena. Now, toss in the landscape still doesn't easily lend itself to cheap transportation networks or sedentary agriculture, is not only HUGE, but diverse, then add the fact that the current national boundaries have nothing to do with the on-the-ground tribal/ethnic reality, then realize that the indigenous institutions are not and were not indigenous but imposed by colonial administrations, and voila, you have a perfect shit-storm of fucked-beyond-comprehension.

Now compare that to either China, which has had strong cultural and governmental traditions extending back millennia, two navigable river systems, large areas of sedentary agriculture, and not having been a former European colony, or even Korea, which at least has internal ethnic similarities if not homogeneity, not to mention being strongly influenced by neighboring China, or having its social/technical/governing systems accelerated by being on the frontline of the Cold War, as well as being a comparatively small space (South Korea is about the same size as Indiana), and you can see both China and Korea, though having their own sets of internal issues, do not have the same geographical challenges as does most of Africa.

Yes, Africa is a shithole and no, it doesn't have to be. One step would be for a pan-continental Congress which would redraw the national maps to reflect social and geographical realities.
After all, for fucks sake, the two largest language groups are Swahili and Bantu, yet the most commonly used languages are Arabic, English and French, none of which are indigenous.
If that doesn't spelled fucked up, I'm not sure what does.
 
I've never heard that before. Are you sure that's right?

Absolutely:

"The horse evolved in the Americas, but became extinct between 8,000 and 12,000 years ago. When the Spanish arrived on the American mainland in the 16th century, they brought horses with them and re-established the animals on the continent."
 
See, that's partially what I'm saying.

I know geography and colonialism played a part.

But they haven't for some time and they didn't for THOUSANDS of years before.

Yes, Africa is a shithole and no, it doesn't have to be. One step would be for a pan-continental Congress which would redraw the national maps to reflect social and geographical realities.

I don't think a bunch of folks in a far off land telling Africa what to do will make much of a difference.

We can't even get black people in Chicago to stop killing each other in droves.

I don't think any matter of supplies, food and drugs will do much of anything for that continent.

Hasn't so far.

They won't even put condoms on to save themselves.


After all, for fucks sake, the two largest language groups are Swahili and Bantu, yet the most commonly used languages are Arabic, English and French, none of which are indigenous.
If that doesn't spelled fucked up, I'm not sure what does.

Well if they organized....got together to do something other than fight.

Like build a fuckin' irrigation system or school. Buy some commercial/agricultural/manufacturing equipment instead of RPG's and AK's.

Maybe things would be less fucked up for them.

Personally I'm content to just let them fight and slaughter each other endlessly.

We should send them better, more effective weapons.
 
Last edited:
They work, herd, care for, house, breed, milk and eat them. If that doesn't qualify as domesticated livestock then you're just using the term under some unknown made up definition the rest of the English speaking world is unaware of.

You're showing pictures but no evidence of the domestication, and no I'm using the actual definition. Not some unknown definition. Dogs are domestic, wolves are not. You can TAME a wolf but a tame wolf is not a domesticated animal. IT simply isn't. Words have meanings.
 
You're showing pictures but no evidence of the domestication, and no I'm using the actual definition. Not some unknown definition. Dogs are domestic, wolves are not. You can TAME a wolf but a tame wolf is not a domesticated animal. IT simply isn't. Words have meanings.

Is documentation of people not only caring for, but raising, using them as labor, food, transportation not evidence of domestication?

At least in a livestock/natural resource sense? :confused:



I'm guessing ............ because evil white man. :cool:


I'm done with the racist and sexist regressive left, can't take ya'lls hate anymore.
 
Last edited:
It's statistically irrefutable. Nobody else wanted Trump.

Whites again exist on their own plantation that nobody else wants to be on.

You won't be the majority anymore by 2043. Which means you have 27 more years to enact your Nazi agendas, and then the party is over.

Thats not true. But you have to consider, this was a Republican landslide, to say the least. You do realize that the entire country, with a few exceptions is basically Republican, I mean....what does that tell you? Come on...There's only roughly 20 governors that are democrat, and local Democrats will only control all the levers of power in five states.

think about that....
 
Thats not true.
Oh, so you're saying that this is untrue?

You mean to say that 88% of blacks, 65% of Latinos, 65% of Asians and 56% of other racial groups did not vote for Clinton?

Before we go on, I want you to say that they did not vote for Clinton.

But you have to consider, this was a Republican landslide, to say the least. You do realize that the entire country, with a few exceptions is basically Republican, I mean....what does that tell you? Come on...There's only roughly 20 governors that are democrat, and local Democrats will only control all the levers of power in five states.
The current (but diminishing) white majority demands Republicans. The numbers dictate this.

But it won't last because whites won't remain the majority for much longer.
 
Obama could not have won either time without non-whites. He lost the white vote both times, the second time by a very substantial margin.

So, what's your point? :confused:
Whites are on the decline as a percentage of the population. You do the math on that.
 
You are hilariously wrong.

Africa's #1 problem is its climate. If Europe were plagued by a Sahara desert it, too, would be like Africa.

Just here to team up against me eh. Guess so.

Reading that doesn't tell me anything I don't already know, and not all of Africa is the Sahara. But they almost all seem to lack things you would need for a growing early civilization. Please remind me how great petroleum and uranium were two hundred years ago however. Diamonds, gold and silver don't build shit either. So. . .salt and woods. Stellar. It's almost like you're intentionally dense just to pick a fight with me.

Good job.
 
Oh, so you're saying that this is untrue?

You mean to say that 88% of blacks, 65% of Latinos, 65% of Asians and 56% of other racial groups did not vote for Clinton?

Before we go on, I want you to say that they did not vote for Clinton.


The current (but diminishing) white majority demands Republicans. The numbers dictate this.

But it won't last because whites won't remain the majority for much longer.

First of all, its CNN....fake news,second, its exit polls, which dont mean SQUAT! White will blend in at some pont, so that is true....
 
Jihadi Islam has had a huge, muderous, oppressive hand in keeping so much of Africa enslaved to its third world stage.
 
First of all, its CNN....fake news,second, its exit polls, which dont mean SQUAT! White will blend in at some pont, so that is true....

CNN is not fake news and why would you say that exit polls don't mean squat? They are generally considered more accurate than general polls.
 
CNN is not fake news and why would you say that exit polls don't mean squat? They are generally considered more accurate than general polls.

Lame stream media are like rabid dogs....attack, attack....its horrible. Washinogton post, god Id be surprise if they dont lose more subscribers...
 
LMFAO!!!

Well that explains a lot.....

That I'm not an idiot?

Lame stream media are like rabid dogs....attack, attack....its horrible. Washinogton post, god Id be surprise if they dont lose more subscribers...

Yes they are attack, attack, attack it's what makes them money. Independent media in my experience is much worse on that particular front, plus they tend to have lower standards in the first place.
 
CNN is not fake news, that's dumb. Their interpretation of the news is mostly bullshit, though.
 
There is a difference between having a bias a lying however. Personally as I do more research I find myself pissed that CNN works so hard to pretend they don't have a bias.
 
Just here to team up against me eh. Guess so.

Reading that doesn't tell me anything I don't already know, and not all of Africa is the Sahara. But they almost all seem to lack things you would need for a growing early civilization. Please remind me how great petroleum and uranium were two hundred years ago however. Diamonds, gold and silver don't build shit either. So. . .salt and woods. Stellar. It's almost like you're intentionally dense just to pick a fight with me.

Good job.
You said Africa has shit for natural resources. That is the statement that I challenged. I literally showed you that you were factually wrong.

Diamonds, gold and silver don't build shit but yet for some reason they have enormous value. I wonder why? Well, that requires that we take a look at your "Diamonds, gold and silver don't build shit" remark:

Diamonds are great for supercomputers:
http://www.seeker.com/diamonds-are-a-supercomputers-best-friend-discovery-news-1766504961.html

Industries depend on diamonds:
https://www.ritani.com/blog/diamonds/uses-for-diamonds-outside-jewelry/
http://geology.com/minerals/diamond.shtml

Same thing for gold:
http://www.usfunds.com/slideshows/the-many-uses-of-gold/

And silver:
https://www.bullionvault.com/guide/gold/Silver-industrial-demand

In general, China is scrambling for Africa's "shit" resources:
http://www.mining.com/feature-chinas-scramble-for-africa/
http://www.chinafile.com/library/ch...controversial-trade-africas-natural-resources

In short, your "Africa has shit for natural resources" argument has been destroyed from every possible angle. But hey, you can feel free to believe you're just being jumped on. Well then, enjoy!
 
First of all, its CNN....fake news,second, its exit polls, which dont mean SQUAT! White will blend in at some pont, so that is true....
What makes CNN news fake? And since you're bashing CNN, how about you give us an idea of what news sources you think we should listen to?
 
Back
Top